u/UserLB

I honestly don’t know if this is even a good place to post this, so disregard if not. I own a 2023 D90, from brand new, with about 30k miles. It is kept in the garage.

I love it.

Today, I noticed that the window tinting on both side windows, that was installed by the dealer I guess, is bubbling and getting wrinkles. To be clear, I didn’t take it to a place to add tinted windows; it came from the dealer like that.

I live in Florida, and all vehicles I’ve ever purchased for the past 20 years, new, come like that. This is the first time that I’ve ever seen anything like this happening. And I really would never expect it in a 3 year old car.

No clue what to do? Call the dealer and see if this is covered by warranty?

I just set up a Starlink Mini (Roam 100GB plan) as a wireless WAN backup failover (connected via WiFi SD adapter on 5GHz to the Mini sitting on my exterior fascia). When it’s active, throughput maxes out around 10 Mbps, way lower than my primary fiber at 1Gbps and the 250Mbps I get from Starlink. (This is a different issue, the SD Wifi adapter has been disappointing)

I want Firewalla to automatically adapt when the wireless WAN becomes the active upstream instead of fiber to control how much I consume from the Starlink.
I know I can use Route Rules with Target Lists to match traffic patterns, and I’m thinking this might be the way:

1. Create a Target List that includes my work IP/MAC, my kids’ devices, and high-traffic patterns like backups
2. When wireless WAN is active, route those specific sources through the satellite link with QoS caps or deprioritization
3. Keep everything else on the primary fiber when possible

But I’m not sure if this is the cleanest approach. Ideally, I’d love source-based policy-based routing that just says: “When wireless WAN is primary, apply this set of rules to these sources automatically.”

Is Route Rules + Target Lists the intended way to handle this scenario?

Does Firewalla detect WAN failover automatically, or do I need to manually toggle the routing policy when fiber goes down?

Has anyone done something similar? How’s it working for you?.

I’m a music-first listener with an Apple Music HiRes/Dolby setup, currently running a stereo pair of Era 300s + Sub Mini that I love. I’m seriously considering switching to Sonos Amp + high-end passive bookshelf speakers (KEF or B&O) for two reasons:

1. Better sound quality: I understand that quality passive speakers driven by the Amp would likely sound better than the Era 300s for critical music listening. But not sure if it’ll be marginal.
2. Long-term flexibility: I’d rather own the speaker choice now and have the option to swap amps later (WiiM, higher-end amps) without being locked into Sonos’s all-in-one ecosystem. Granted I’ve been with Sonos for a long time, and im reaching that refresh cycle.

The appeal of the Sonos Amp route is that I could keep the Sonos ecosystem (grouping the Amp with my Sub Mini for the same integrated experience) while getting better sound and future-proofing my setup.

What would I actually lose by going Sonos Amp + passive speakers vs staying with Era 300 + Sub Mini? Trying to be realistic if this move is worth the spend. I don’t think I’d lose ecosystem integration ; for example the Amp is fully Sonos-compatible and can group with my Sub Mini just fine, but maybe I lose Airplay or grouping, or who knows. There’s got to be something I’m trading away, and I want to think through it clearly before dropping money on new speakers.

I’d expect, at least, significant better sound than even a pair of Play 5s