How do you even plan on achieving this, because in the best case scenario it is purely authoritarian and goes against free speech, and in the worst case it is literal thought policing.
Honestly though, how many people here *actually* like Trump so much that we should me called "MAGAYouth", I feel like most people here don't like him that much.
Pretty ironic that when the baby is born a lot less people would kill them, and the ones that would do it justify it like they do abortion (literally, one said they would do it because the baby is "less consious").
Don't look at that big group of non-white pro-lifers over there.
I can't believe it has already been so long, and that I am now officially an adult (where I live, at least).
FIOM is quite a big organization that handles things like unwanted pregnancies and adoption. They recently put out these guidelines meant to be used by journalists to make it more "accurate" and "in line with science".
I want to add a few things due to how it was translated:
"Aborteur of aborteuse" means "abortionist" in english.
"Verwekker" does not translate to "father", it more accurately translates to "causative agent".
And "abortus plegen" does not translate to "have an abortion" in this context, it more accurately translates to "comitting an abortion".
Also, isn't it strange that they want journalists to call pro-aborts what they call themselves, but don't want them to call pro-lifers what we call ourselves. Also, very slick of them to say that using words like "unborn child" causes value judgements and that they want them to stay "neutral", way to dance around the fact that they just want them to use dehumanizing language.