CBT therapist conflict & antagonism
I’m having CBT for panic attacks which were controlled by a low dose beta blocker. But I didn’t like the sides and then my anxiety got worse and I had attacks whilst on them.
I referred myself for CBT and was accepted a text-based CBT treatment. I successfully had CBT face to face years ago which focused on coping with panic symptoms, lowering overall stress and exposure to trigger environments.
From the get go I found the text-based therapy unhelpful and critical, even though I think what they’re saying may be somewhat true. The CBT therapist feels I’m avoiding the attacks themselves, which is the root problem. During attacks my heart-rate goes extremely high (160-190) and gets stuck in a cycle of panic. The CBT therapist told me to come off the beta blocker and accept these attacks which happen every day. So far I have not been able to tolerate one without taking a beta blocker.
I’ve explained how unpleasant they are and how they last longer than 30 mins and can go on for hours so and asked how is sitting in that going to help. They have now stated that I am seeking reassurance by asking that and I just need to accept them. Or take Sertraline. But they told me I mustn’t take beta blocker long term for panic as it’s avoidance.
I have no confidence they’re solving this problem or are engaged in any way. They seem to just repeat a “gold standard” template, and tell me I’m wrong because it’s not working. Patently, sitting with an extremely high racing heart for hours on end is not going to solve my anxiety attacks on its own and is disruptive. Of course I want to avoid that.. I asked what I should be doing mentally and they offered no advice just cryptic “you know what you should do: acceptance”.
I just wanted advice here - my previous CBT therapists were really empathetic, thoughtful, invested. But the current therapists says they were bad therapists if they didn’t truly treat the problem.
I just have bad vibes about them, even if I suspect the theory is right. Advice?