
Jury REFUSES To Convict Palestine Action Defendants
>The jury also asked the court whether the defendants would be sentenced as terrorists if they returned a guilty verdict. (1:41)

>The jury also asked the court whether the defendants would be sentenced as terrorists if they returned a guilty verdict. (1:41)
This is an alternate motion to Zionism is Racism, born out of attempts to reach a compromise and/or consensus between G4P and JGs. The language is notably softer in parts compared to ZiR, but it removes a lot of the internally contentious rhetoric.
I think there's quite a bit we can learn from this. There're quite a few parallels between the defence of Platner and the defence of the antinsemitic and conspiratorial Green candidates in the locals/Makerfield. Obviously it's not completely the same (Platner's case is much more...American) but the reflexive dismissals betray similar attitudes.