
r/LabourUK

Andy Burnham to donate 15% of PM salary to homelessness fight
bigissue.comStatsForLefties (Eleanora Folan) elected to Green Party governing council
She's posted about it on her Twitter account here: https://x.com/LeftieStats/status/2090037047016685674
Also just a reminder that the pinned post on the StatsForLefties Twitter account says "🫡 Glory to the Iranian resistance, whose courageous fight against the imperialist dogs of the USA has utterly humiliated the Great Satan✊. Inshallah Iran will fully repel US imperialism, Palestine will be freed from the bloodthirsty Zionist entity and Israel will be abolished✊."
Another normal day in Green Party land then
'Don't rape, sexually assault or make kissing noises' at people, asylum seekers warned in guidance about living in UK
news.sky.comJury REFUSES To Convict Palestine Action Defendants
>The jury also asked the court whether the defendants would be sentenced as terrorists if they returned a guilty verdict. (1:41)
Burnham: Economic growth policy will move from HMT to No.10 North
civilserviceworld.comThe Great ADHD Myth? The Real Myth Is That This Was Balanced Television
adhdworking.co.ukMigrant who raped sleeping woman wins right to remain in UK under European Convention on Human Rights - sparking new furious calls to quit treaty
dailymail.comAndy Burnham on wildfires and climate change: ‘We cannot accept this as the new normal'
youtube.comJason Arday: J'Accuse the British Media | Will Self
willself1.substack.comGovernment’s response to petition against Labour’s bathroom ban: Drop Dead
The cabinet office published its response to an anti-EHRC transphobia petition, its not good:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/770527#main-content
The full text of the response: > The Equality and Human Rights Commission (“EHRC”) has developed a revised Code of Practice for Services, Public Functions and Associations (“the Code”). This Code provides guidance for duty bearers on how to comply with the 2010 Act. If a service provider is still unsure, they should seek legal advice. The Code covers discrimination, harassment and victimisation in services, public functions and associations across all protected characteristics.
> The Code was laid before Parliament on 21st May, to allow for a period of Parliamentary scrutiny. That period ended on 9th July, as laid out in the Equality Act 2006. As Parliament did not disapprove the draft Code, the new Code was brought in through the process required by the Equality Act 2006 from 5 August.
> With regards to women being excluded from spaces based on appearance; the Code explains that it’s not always possible to be sure of someone's sex based on their appearance. Whether it is necessary and proportionate for providers to ask someone about their sex will depend on the specific circumstances. As for trans people accessing toilets and facilities, the Code is clear that trans people should not be left without access to services or facilities. Whilst the Code indicates that toilets designated as male or female should be for those of that sex, for trans people who don’t feel comfortable using toilets in line with their sex, providers may have other facilities open to them, such as accessible toilets or self-contained lockable toilets - which anyone can use. In places, like cafes, where there are just one or two toilets for both men and women, anyone can use them. The Code is clear that there should be toilet provision for everyone.
> With regards to sport, everyone should be able to enjoy the physical and mental health benefits of sport, and to participate in a way that ensures they feel safe. The Code allows for restrictions in sports in "gender-affected activities". Gender-affected activities apply to any sport where the physical strength, stamina, or physique of an average person of one sex would put them at a disadvantage against the other. Organisers should consider if there are other ways to include trans people, such as "Open" or "Mixed-Sex" categories, rather than total exclusion from the sport entirely. Beyond the Code, this Government wants to ensure that all LGBT+ people are safe, included, and protected from discrimination. We have published a draft bill to ban conversion practices, offering protection from these abusive practices. The NHS has commissioned its first ever review to tackle health inequalities experienced by LGBT+ people led by Dr Michael Brady, including access to mental health care, cancer screening and primary care services. The review will be published later this year. Additionally, we have recently enacted stronger legislation to tackle hate crimes based on transgender identity, sexual orientation, and sex, making all existing strands of hate crime an aggravated offence.
Cabinet Office
Andy Burnham's government is set to make a U-turn on EV sales targets after car industry lobbying
Net-zero has two parts to it. One is the energy supply side which relates to North Sea oil and gas production. The other is the far more important demand side which relates to EVs, heat-pumps, renewables, batteries, high-speed rail, etc.
Can someone who's a Burnham explain this choice? The UK is currently about to be hit badly by an inflation crisis where our dependence on imported oil and gas is the root cause. The fact that our haulage depends so heavily on diesel, our heating so heavily on gas, and our cars so heavily on petrol are huge vulnerabilities.
Why would the UK PM be seeking to increase such future vulnerabilities going into the 2030s? If anything he should be seeking to de-risk our haulage from high diesel prices as China is doing via electrified lorries.
It's not a simple cost-of-purchase argument as now the cheapest cars to buy are often EVs. The issues in adoption are often due to policy issues such as the lack of gully cables for terrace houses or charging pods for those in apartments. As he's the PM he shouldn't be lessening demand side net-zero targets due to this.
There's a wider discussion which few people are discussing. Gas heating is going to also be hugely expensive this winter. This is worsened due to a frankly poor heat-pump rollout over the last few years of which this government is partly responsible. When prices surge this winter as Cornwall Insight imply they will is it a good look to be lessening the ambition to make us more robust for the future?
How much is this due to lobbying from the US president?