u/_L______________

(Sorry in advance for the book length post 🙄 I just want everyone to understand what they’re seeing and why I’m posting)

For context, this is my screen recording of the convo the affectionate heart account and I had on their post a day or two ago, (THAT THEY DELETED immediately at the end of the convo) it makes me personally think they are blaundriebff.

Unfortunately I thought I had the absolute full post and comment threads. It does appear there’s one thread that cuts off slightly early that I missed. But literally everything that matters and 99 percent of the post they tried to delete and make sure you guys didn’t see IS there. There were also people in the comment section watching it unfold if any of you guys see this post too and would like to pipe in about the missing chunk after our popcorn gifs.

Sorry you’ll have to pause and such to read it all, I just recorded it at the time bc the convo itself led me to suspect they were a completely different account that I argued with back in like October on d4vdiots. It genuinely gave me the CREEPS, and they had a habit of deleting shit over there, so I did a quick scroll through. Surprise surprise, this poster deleted it too.

TBC I’m not posting this to start a convo with this sus account again, or to get people to hate on them, or anything of that nature. The mods want the receipts to be public. So I’m bringing them. Consider it my PSA. You guys look for yourselves and decide. It’s not the only account im suspicious of. So really, it’s me warning everybody to fact check before just believing people on here.

I think that if I’m right, the only reason they’d be in trapology saying they support trapp on one message and then shitting on trapology itself in the next is just to start shit and cause chaos because they did the same in d4vdiots, and it worked to get them on the mod team there.

Since the discussion for the Celeste Rivas case has moved here, I think this gross attempt to shift the narrative in it has followed.

Side note: during this whole interaction I went to go follow affectionate heart at their request to do so. Hit follow THEN immediately saw their account age and became suspicious at that point. I unfollowed pretty quickly. This went undiscussed for probably close to an hour as we had this ridiculous back and forth and is what they’re referring to when they said I followed them. And I said yeah for .5 seconds.

I also believe whoever is behind these multiple sus accounts is likely mentally unwell. Practice internet safety and be kind to each other guys.

#justiceforceleste

and to anyone out there who’s been saying nasty shit online around this case or any other👎🏽 boo you suck.

Edit: also the user I refer to being blocked from seeing remys responses to my question is also affectionate heart who just so happens to have been blocked after remydl removed all those mods. Js.

I’m having trouble understanding one key factor in this case. (I mean obviously lots of other things about it too but one thing is standing out.) so I’m hoping someone can explain it to me like I’m five.

It’s clear from the notes, whoever did this wanted a clean exchange, it’s even almost sociopath/ narcissist levels of disconnect in the first chunk of that first letter with the way they assume the family will just listen immediately. This seems almost strictly transactional for them in that first note.

They go through the trouble to say no law enforcement in the letters, I’m assuming this is because they had to know damn well they couldn’t extract the bit coin if law enforcement became involved because then it’s traceable, (they vaguely acknowledge this in the letters by saying stuff like ‘in everyone’s best interest’ and it’s evidenced by the lack of any news they ever accessed that small amount authorities deposited early on).

So WHY, then follow it up by sending it to a news outlet who will undoubtedly contact law enforcement before contacting the family?

It doesn’t make sense! Make it make sense!

Why send it the one place that would immediately nuke their whole plan? I don’t think just news outlets being less risky than some other form of contact holds up, if the goal was seemingly originally no police contact all together?

Edit: the comments have made me feel more so this is a valid question. So I wanted to come add here that I do not have full faith in my understanding of bitcoin, please if you have more knowledge on that area or in cybersecurity please weigh in in the comments and debunk me or validate me or something.

Edit #2 because I had time to go read a bit more on bitcoin. The last thing I want to do is accidentally mislead people and since this post has gotten some attention but noones visibly fact checked me as of typing this, I wanted to come make the corrections I can!

I overstated the traceability factor here. LE can trace blockchains. But It’s not as absolute as my wording or understanding made it seem. So I wanted to be clear on that. However, it still doesn’t make sense for them to send the bitcoin address in a direct line to the news who would likely contact law enforcement first. It gives LE a lead if they were to try to move it, right at the start of everything, that is unnecessary risk in this kind of situation.

So my observation I think is valid, but not as absolute as I was under the impression it was when I wrote the post. And the way my wording made it sound. Obviously it’s all speculation and it’s ultimately about getting to the facts and #justice4nancy. Hope this turns some gears for someone with a better grasp on it.

Edit#3 (I guess more of an update because I think we changed the convo in the comments! Good work guys!) Here’s news nations vid link from last night.

https://youtu.be/YhyVSvf3ggs?is=PFEIdH22JNuWphCE