u/_fantastic_mr_fox

Image 1 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 2 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 3 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 4 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 5 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 6 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 7 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 8 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 9 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 10 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake
Image 11 — Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake

Vintage 9411/0 Tudor Snowflake

I was recommended to post here by a fellow redditor. Trying to verify authenticity of this piece, figured additional fellow redditors could help lol. Picked up online, had verified by jeweler, verified by Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, and another Ai software for authentication for watches.

A few things to note, the hands have been replaced aftermarket. The watch has had previous water damage (some kind of moisture at some point in the case) likely from bad crystal or gasket back in the day, and was polished all noted by my jeweler. New crystal, aftermarket jubilee, aftermarket bezel/insert and pip. Everything else seems original as well as the jewelers notes, when he checked case engravings and dial and movement under loop to verify he seemed to believe its authenticity. Curious on other notes or anything I’m missing.

u/_fantastic_mr_fox — 3 days ago

Tudor Submariner 9411/0

Picked up online and took it into my local watch servicer here in Los Angeles, he says it’s all good and looks legit, serial engravings and model looks correct. Case back engraving looks correct to him as well. The patina on the hour markers he said look correct puckering for tritium aging. He said the bezel and crystal have been replaced at some point. Dial print under loop was said to be clean as well and correct finish. I wanted some fellow redditor thoughts.

u/_fantastic_mr_fox — 3 days ago