PSA: Magnific’s “Unlimited” plan can be paused for using it too much, even if you broke no rules

Posting this as a warning for people considering Magnific because of its unlimited plans.

I subscribed specifically because unlimited usage was one of the main selling points. I ended up using it entirely as an individual user. At some point, my Unlimited access was disabled.

I contacted support and appealed the restriction. After reviewing my account after some days, Magnific restored unlimited and confirmed that they had not found a Terms of Service violation.

The issue was: the amount of usage. They said that using it just sometimes is "what the Fair Use Policy is built around" and I should only use unlimited for testing.

This is a very big no no for me. Their current Unlimited documentation says that when usage goes far beyond priority usage, generations may become slower. And it explicitly says that it doesn't stop.

Their documentation also describes account pauses primarily in the context of suspected automation, account sharing or similar prohibited activity....

I think there is a major transparency problem between that broad clause and the much more specific promise presented to Unlimited customers:

“Generations don't stop. There is no cap.”

If legitimate manual usage can reach an undisclosed level where Unlimited is disabled and the customer has to appeal to get it restored, I think that limitation should be made much clearer before purchase!

To me, advertising a service as “Unlimited” while enforcing an undisclosed usage threshold that can result in the Unlimited feature being disabled is clearly misleading advertising. If heavy but legitimate manual usage is not actually sustainable under the plan, that limitation should be stated upfront instead of only becoming apparent after a customer hits it.

I'm posting this mainly so other heavy AI users know what happened before choosing Magnific. For me, this has seriously damaged my perception of the company, and I don't think I'll be able to trust them again once my current plan expires.

reddit.com
u/acautelado — 11 days ago

PSA: Magnific’s “Unlimited” plan can be paused for using it too much, even if you broke no rules

Posting this as a warning for people considering Magnific because of its unlimited plans.

I subscribed specifically because unlimited usage was one of the main selling points. I ended up using it entirely as an individual user. At some point, my Unlimited access was disabled.

I contacted support and appealed the restriction. After reviewing my account after some days, Magnific restored unlimited and confirmed that they had not found a Terms of Service violation.

The issue was: the amount of usage. They said that using it just sometimes is "what the Fair Use Policy is built around" and I should only use unlimited for testing.

This is a very big no no for me. Their current Unlimited documentation says that when usage goes far beyond priority usage, generations may become slower. And it explicitly says:

Their documentation also describes account pauses primarily in the context of suspected automation, account sharing or similar prohibited activity....

I think there is a major transparency problem between that broad clause and the much more specific promise presented to Unlimited customers:

“Generations don't stop. There is no cap.”

If legitimate manual usage can reach an undisclosed level where Unlimited is disabled and the customer has to appeal to get it restored, I think that limitation should be made much clearer before purchase!

To me, advertising a service as “Unlimited” while enforcing an undisclosed usage threshold that can result in the Unlimited feature being disabled is clearly misleading advertising. If heavy but legitimate manual usage is not actually sustainable under the plan, that limitation should be stated upfront instead of only becoming apparent after a customer hits it.

I'm posting this mainly so other heavy AI users know what happened before choosing Magnific. For me, this has seriously damaged my perception of the company, and I don't think I'll be able to trust them again once my current plan expires.

reddit.com
u/acautelado — 11 days ago

Is AXIS actually a new Brazilian AI image model?

A Brazilian company recently launched AXIS, which is being marketed as the “first brazilian AI image generation model.”

The platform can be accessed here:

https://goaxis.app/dashboard

I am a little skeptical about the claim that this is a new Brazilian image model. I could not find much technical information about it, about it's training, anything...

Because of that, I am wondering whether AXIS is actually a proprietary foundation model or whether it might be a fine-tune, LoRA or application layer built on top of an existing open-source model, possibly something like Krea 2.

To be clear, there would be nothing inherently wrong with building a Brazilian product on top of an open-source model. My concern is specifically about how the product is being described, selled and announced.

Is there any way to have evidence that it was genuinely trained as a new foundation model, rather than being a fine-tune or a platform built around another model?

u/acautelado — 29 days ago

I’m tired of people saying “they showed the Weeping Angels moving” in Flesh and Stone

https://youtu.be/5UWpWybmo6k?is=bCLaQT9X\_6zwEj0g

The Angels are not being shown moving while observed. The light is flickering, and they move during the moments of darkness, when nobody can see them. Because the flashes happen so quickly, the scene creates a stop-motion effect.

That has always seemed obvious to me, so I don’t understand why people keep saying, “They showed the Angels moving!”

If Weeping Angels can only move when they are not being observed, then it makes perfect sense for them to move during the dark intervals between each flash of light. This was such a cool idea, making them move while the lights blink. Bur nobody seems to understand the scene.

u/acautelado — 30 days ago
▲ 4 r/kimi

Kimi desktop app for Mac: always "Task paused due to system peak" until now. Is this normal?

I want to test Kimi before buying a month, but in desktop this is all that shows. If I pay for it, this message would still be normal or it's only happening because I'm on free version?

reddit.com
u/acautelado — 1 month ago

Magnific paused my "Unlimited" plan and support only replies with the same canned message. What actually works here?

I’ve been on Magnific’s Unlimited plan for a while, but today my access was suddenly paused while I was in the middle of a project. I’m creating a video using my own script and characters I designed myself. I wasn’t using automation, sharing my account, reselling anything, or running some kind of bulk operation or anything! I was just generating manually in one sitting.

Support told me that my account had either gone “far beyond what’s sustainable under the Fair Use Policy”, But they still didn’t tell me what I supposedly did. Every follow-up is automatic. So either my manual usage was incorrectly flagged as suspicious, or accounts can also be paused for heavy use under conditions that aren’t clearly explained in the published policy.

I have all the chats, all my prompts, all the process to show that It was me, a human, making it manually... Even the prompts that I made when I was using it and I was paused had a typo!

Has anyone here had their access restored after something like this? What actually helped? Every time I try to click on "contact support" the same e-mail is sent to me.

I subscribed specifically because the plan advertised unlimited Nano Banana generations... I've had this account only for two weeks. I'm very disappointed.

Has anyone dealt with this before? What did you do to get a real response?

reddit.com
u/acautelado — 1 month ago

Is there a process, similar to Magic Layers in Canva or Layerize in Ideogram, for transforming text in images into editable layers in an open-source workflow?

More specifically, I want to take an existing image that contains text and transform that text into separate, editable layers, ideally while preserving the background as cleanly as possible.

The goal would be something like:

  1. Detect the text inside the image
  2. Remove or reconstruct the background behind the text
  3. Extract the text as editable or replaceable elements
  4. Keep the rest of the image intact for further editing

Does anyone know if there is already an open-source tool, ComfyUI workflow or combination of tools that can achieve this?

I’m not necessarily looking for a perfect one-click solution. Even a multi-step workflow using OCR, inpainting, segmentation, or layer extraction would be useful.

reddit.com
u/acautelado — 3 months ago