![Image 1 — Finding a job in San Francisco now takes ~40 weeks. In Birmingham, AL, it takes ~12. [OC, BLS data]](https://preview.redd.it/6tigajcvup0h1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2c881799d9624c38ce2516710681c687985e443)
![Image 2 — Finding a job in San Francisco now takes ~40 weeks. In Birmingham, AL, it takes ~12. [OC, BLS data]](https://preview.redd.it/qeyy0jcvup0h1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ca32afdd840b2c49de0815c614db89538b8b2f93)
Finding a job in San Francisco now takes ~40 weeks. In Birmingham, AL, it takes ~12. [OC, BLS data]
I looked at BLS labor market data across 49 major US metros and ran a difficulty index against the national average. The spread is wider than I expected going in.
Most of the hardest metros are coastal and tech-heavy. Six of the top ten hardest are in California, and San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle are all still working through the post-2022 contraction. White-collar hiring hasn't bounced back the way blue-collar has, and that's a big part of why these metros are still rough.
The easier side of the list is mostly Southeast and Midwest. Birmingham, Oklahoma City, Atlanta, Memphis, Nashville, Indianapolis, Kansas City. Lower cost of living, less concentrated in any one sector, and a lot of the hiring that's actually happening in the US right now is happening there.
Full list of 49 metros plus the methodology is here.
Curious what people think is driving the gap. The tech contraction explains part of the coastal pain, but I don't think it fully accounts for how much the Southeast is outpacing.