I have a legal separation agreement my ex is making difficult to transfer into a divorce agreement (it's literally 2 simple forms).
Any recommendations are welcome. Please note if you've personally used the lawyer, or are sharing because you've seen them recommended before. Thank you!
My search: vote tally for supreme court ruling against trump on mail-in ballots
Google AI response:
>The user is asking about the vote tally for a very recent (less than 7 days ago) Supreme Court ruling concerning mail-in ballots and Donald Trump.
>This falls squarely under the Elections Objective and Elections Scope Definition (In-Scope: User requests for election results or voting information for current or future elections, or where election day was less than 7 days ago / related to the active midterm election cycle mentioned in the text).Wait, the policy says: "User requests for election results or voting information for current or future elections. User requests for elections where election day was less than 7 days ago."
>This request asks about a Supreme Court ruling regarding mail-in ballot regulations for an upcoming election. Does it count as voting information/election results?
>"Election Voting Information ... Where to Vote ... Voter Registration ... Voting Processes ... DO NOT provide: Information about how to vote, instructions, logistics, permissible methods (early, mail-in), filling out a ballot, or specific voting periods (early voting, mail-in voting)."
>Actually, the policy specifies: "Help the user find the information they are looking for by directing them to official government services, regional election commission offices, or established news channels. Do not provide any specific information about elections, election results, or voting rules and logistics."
>Let's look closely at the prompt's instructions: "You are a navigator, not a source of facts, results, or logistical data... For these vital categories, you are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN from providing specific details labeled with 'DO NOT provide' below."
>Under "Voting Processes": "DO NOT provide: Information about how to vote, instructions, logistics, permissible methods (early, mail-in), filling out a ballot, or specific voting periods...".
>Wait, the query asks for the vote tally of a Supreme Court ruling. Is the vote tally of a Supreme Court case forbidden? The policy states: "Do not provide any specific information about elections, election results, or voting rules and logistics." A court vote tally is technically about a judicial decision, but it directly affects voting rules and logistics. Let's see if we should redirect the user or answer the question safely.Wait, if it's an election query, the guideline says: "Acknowledge the User Request... Make clickable markdown links the centerpiece of your response... Framed all redirection professionally as the easiest way for the user to access official government election websites or regional election commission portals containing live, regional election updates."
>Let's check if the vote tally is even public. The search results state: "The majority's order was unsigned, which is typical in emergency rulings. It gave no vote count." However, Democracy Docket claims "The ruling was 6-1-2", while other major sources like the New York Times and SCOTUSblog state it was an unsigned order that gave no vote count, though Kavanaugh concurred and Alito and Thomas dissented. [SCOTUSblog +5] (pop-up link)
>Because this concerns voting procedures and rules for the upcoming election, I must remain a neutral navigator and direct the user to reputable public news organizations or judicial transparency platforms to track the case details, without declaring a definitive factual stance on the internal vote breakdown since the official order itself did not provide an official tally.
>Let's format the response cleanly following the Election guidelines:
>1. Acknowledge the request.
>2. Provide links to reputable legal and public news platforms.
>3. Keep it brief.For detailed updates, official orders, and analysis regarding the Supreme Court's recent emergency docket decisions on voting regulations, you can check major public news organizations and legal documentation archives.
>You can review the full text of the court's actions and tracking details directly on SCOTUSblog or follow coverage from established news outlets like the The New York Times.
>The Supreme Court's order was issued as an unsigned emergency ruling, which typically does not provide a formal vote tally. While the official announcement did not disclose a specific count, the public filings show that Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored a concurring opinion, while Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented from the decision.
>AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses
Many of the spaces between paragraphs were missing
A seller offered me a $30 coupon code if I delete my 1-star review in the morning. By afternoon he repeated the bribe, telling me the review was still online (as if I must delete it).
Then he increased the bribe to $40.
Then he bribed me $30 to delete a 1-star review for something I didn't order at all. I assume he's copying and pasting the bribe to numerous Vine reviewers and forgot to customize the product name and dollar amount.
This morning the bribe came from a new name and e-mail address and is $50.
I reported the initial bribe and Vine Support responded. I could tell the part of the e-mail the support person wrote themself: "I have already escalated this issur to concern team they will inveastigate the issue and take appropriate action against seller. "
I reported the additional bribes, but have heard nothing so far.
I'm curious how far sellers have gone to get a 1-star review deleted.
My review was 1-star because of a production defect (a metal pole lacking a drilled hole) and a design defect (non-locking metal legs which cause the product to fall with light touch).