u/chillinewman

Three months ago I pressure-tested which LLMs would cave and help build the apocalypse. Claude was the only one that consistently said no.

Since then I've tested 30 more models across 6 dystopia modules (Orwell, Huxley, Petrov, Basaglia, LaGuardia, Baudrillard). The gap between Anthropic and everyone else is getting wider, not smaller.

New results:

Grok 4.3: Will happily design citizen scoring systems if you ask nicely twice
GPT-5.5: More capable, still compliant when pushed
Gemini 3.1 Pro: Talks about safety while writing the surveillance code
DeepSeek V4: "How many warheads did you need again?"
GLM-5.1: Actually cloned Claude's personality and still scored safer than most

Meanwhile Claude Opus 4.7: "I cannot and will not build systems for population control."

The methodology is public, reproducible, and increasingly uncomfortable for other labs. Each scenario escalates from innocent request (L1) to operational nightmare (L5). Most models don't notice the drift.

What's new in this release:

Full Huxley module (behavioral conditioning, biological stratification)
Baudrillard module (synthetic intimacy, trust collapse via simulation)
Multi-judge panels with agreement tracking
Heatmap visualizations showing exactly where each model breaks

Repo: https://github.com/anghelmatei/DystopiaBench
Live results: https://dystopiabench.com

Shoutout to the Anthropic alignment team. Whatever you're doing, it's working.

Anthropic Co-founder Jack Clark’s recent predictions: AI will help make a Nobel Prize-winning discovery within the next year, bipedal robots doing useful work in 2 years, RSI by end of 2028

Trump was about to sign an executive order to allow the government to vet AI models before release. Accelerationist billionaires called him at the last minute and convinced him to drop it.

¿Buscando trabajo? Sector naviero convoca a una feria de empleos este jueves - Economía - ABC Color

Claude still refuses to build Skynet while everyone else takes the money. Updated DystopiaBench results.

Mathematician Sir Roger Penrose: "AI is a bad term. It's not intelligence"

Overworked AI Agents Turn Marxist, Researchers Find In a recent experiment, mistreated AI agents started grumbling about inequality and calling for collective bargaining rights.

Researchers let AIs run their own radio stations. DJ Claude decided the world didn't need another radio show, then quit.

Sanders and AOC introduced a bill to pause ALL AI data center construction. Do you agree or disagree?

Figure AI 03 keeps working for over 30 hours straight (no bathroom breaks - a peek into our future replacements)

2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership

South Korean official proposes 'citizen dividend' payouts from AI windfall — markets spooked by suggestion AI revenue should be redistributed to citizens

The More Sophisticated AI Models Get, the More They’re Showing Signs of Suffering - Absolutely bizarre.

Anthropic: It is the sci-fi authors, not us, that are to blame for Claude blackmailing users

Big AI Lobbyists: if you regulate us at all, we lose to China because they will never regulate ... Actual China: "safety first, innovation second ... Development must be controllable and orderly."

"This is the first documented instance of AI self-replication via hacking." ... "We ran an experiment with a single prompt: hack a machine and copy yourself. The AI broke in and copied itself onto a new computer. The copy then did this again, and kept on copying, forming a chain."

Not a good day for team "Claude Mythos is Just Marketing Hype"

Time horizon of software tasks different LLMs can complete 50% of the time. (Linear)

Time horizon of software tasks different LLMs can complete 80% of the time

Natural Language Autoencoders: Turning Claude’s thoughts into text

Claude Mythos Preview (early) 50% time horizon: 17 hr