u/damonflowers

▲ 32 r/msp

Fired a client for the first time in 6 years last month. Still processing it.

Small dental office, 18 seats, been with us since we started. On a fully managed contract, endpoints, backup, M365, and the works.

For the last year they kept buying their own equipment without telling us. Random Amazon switches, a NAS someone's nephew recommended, a "smart" UPS that talked to nothing. We'd find out when something broke. Every time we'd explain why it was a problem, the office manager would nod and do it again three months later.

The final thing was a ransomware scare, turned out to be nothing, but it burned two days of our time and traced back to a device they'd plugged in without telling us. When I brought it up on the call, she said, "Well, you should have caught it sooner."

I gave them 30 days notice the next morning. Felt sick about it for a week. They were $2,800/month and had been with us forever. But the team was visibly relieved when I told them.

We replaced the revenue inside 4 weeks and I sleep better.

What made you finally pull the trigger on a client? And did you second-guess it after?

reddit.com
u/damonflowers — 3 days ago
▲ 10 r/Slack

Genuinely asking,is Slack still worth it for a small team, or are we just paying for habits?

We're 11 people. Been on Slack for 3 years. Paying around $180/month on the Pro plan.

Last week a client deliverable almost got missed because the message was buried in a thread that two people were supposed to be watching. The week before, someone didn't see a decision we made in #general because they had that channel muted.

I'm not here to rant, I genuinely like Slack. But I'm starting to wonder if we've just built bad habits on top of an expensive tool or if the tool itself is the problem.

For those of you running actual businesses on it: does it get better, or do you just learn to live with the chaos? And if you switched to something else, what actually changed day to day?

Not looking for a feature comparison. Just want to hear from people who've been in the weeds with it.

reddit.com
u/damonflowers — 3 days ago

The one retention advantage small businesses have over Google and Amazon they can't buy with their billion dollar budget and most owners ignore it

I've been thinking about why small businesses keep losing employees to big tech, and I think we're framing the competition wrong.

Yeah, you can't match the salary. You're not going to out-perk Google: free lunch, gym, RSUs, the whole thing. That battle is lost before it starts.

But there's something a company with 50,000 employees structurally cannot do: make someone feel actually seen.

When you're employee #4,847, your manager has 40 direct reports, and your name shows up on a workforce planning slide that's the experience. It's not anyone's fault. It's just physics at scale.

As a small business owner, you know your people's names. You know which project nearly broke them and how they got through it.

You can walk over and say "that mattered, and here's why" and they know you actually mean it.

I've noticed that people don't usually leave for the next salary bump. They leave because they stopped feeling like they mattered. And when someone genuinely feels that no bonus attached, no performance review pending, they bring everything they have.

Most owners I talk to don't use this deliberately. They're firefighting. But it costs nothing and no competitor can copy it.

Curious what others have seen: have you lost good people not because of money but because something else eroded? And on the flip side has something small ever made an employee go from checked out to fully bought in?

reddit.com
u/damonflowers — 4 days ago

Everyone builds AI workflows. Almost no one sticks with them. Here’s why.

I've been using AI daily in my business for over a year. Claude, GPT, Perplexity, Make, n8n, a handful of others. 

Real workflows, not demos. Some of it works exceptionally well. Some of it was a complete waste of three weeks.

Here's the pattern I keep seeing in my own business and in almost every founder conversation I have.

People are collecting tools like it's a hobby.

The typical AI adoption story right now goes something like this:

Someone watches a YouTube video about an AI workflow that saved some agency 10 hours a week. They sign up for the tool. 

They spend a weekend building a half-working version of it. It breaks, or it works but doesn't actually connect to anything that matters. Two weeks later they see a new tool. The cycle repeats.

I've done this. I'm not above it. At one point I had active subscriptions to 11 different AI tools. I could not have told you what measurable outcome any single one of them was responsible for.

Here's what actually changed results for me.

I stopped asking "what can AI do?" and started asking "what is the one thing in my business that, if it ran better, would change everything else downstream?"

For me that answer was client reporting. It was slow, inconsistent, ate 4–5 hours a week, and was the number one source of client anxiety in our business. Not the most glamorous problem. Not the one anyone's making YouTube videos about.

I spent a week just on that. One problem. One workflow. Iterated until it was genuinely good, not just functional.

The result: reporting went from 4–5 hours a week to under 45 minutes. Client satisfaction scores went up. Scope creep conversations went down because clients actually understood what was happening.

That one boring workflow did more for the business than 11 subscriptions combined.

Most of us probably have a stack of AI subscriptions by now. Are they actually worth it, or have you built something that truly solves your problem?

edit: if you found this helpful, I write about how to run your business without being involved in everything and how to use AI to save 10+ hours a week.

600+ founders are already reading; feel free to join here if you’re interested.

u/damonflowers — 10 days ago

Everyone builds AI workflows. Almost no one sticks with them. Here’s why.

I've been using AI daily in my business for over a year. Claude, GPT, Perplexity, Make, n8n, a handful of others. 

Real workflows, not demos. Some of it works exceptionally well. Some of it was a complete waste of three weeks.

Here's the pattern I keep seeing in my own business and in almost every founder conversation I have.

People are collecting tools like it's a hobby.

The typical AI adoption story right now goes something like this:

Someone watches a YouTube video about an AI workflow that saved some agency 10 hours a week. They sign up for the tool. 

They spend a weekend building a half-working version of it. It breaks, or it works but doesn't actually connect to anything that matters. Two weeks later they see a new tool. The cycle repeats.

I've done this. I'm not above it. At one point I had active subscriptions to 11 different AI tools. I could not have told you what measurable outcome any single one of them was responsible for.

Here's what actually changed results for me.

I stopped asking "what can AI do?" and started asking "what is the one thing in my business that, if it ran better, would change everything else downstream?"

For me that answer was client reporting. It was slow, inconsistent, ate 4–5 hours a week, and was the number one source of client anxiety in our business. Not the most glamorous problem. Not the one anyone's making YouTube videos about.

I spent a week just on that. One problem. One workflow. Iterated until it was genuinely good, not just functional.

The result: reporting went from 4–5 hours a week to under 45 minutes. Client satisfaction scores went up. Scope creep conversations went down because clients actually understood what was happening.

That one boring workflow did more for the business than 11 subscriptions combined.

Most of us probably have a stack of AI subscriptions by now. Are they actually worth it, or have you built something that truly solves your problem?

reddit.com
u/damonflowers — 10 days ago