▲ 32 r/WMATA

Progress on Metrobus Fare Evasion Has Stalled

I put together a detailed post last month on Metrobus fare evasion, going through WMATA's metrics to understand how we got to the current situation: https://www.reddit.com/r/WMATA/comments/1uyzisf/bus_fare_evasion_and_enforcement_what_the_numbers/

A key takeaway was that WMATA's major initiative on bus fare evasion was having some effect. Bus fare payment for June 2026 was ~37%, a level that WMATA hadn't had since January 2023. Still a national outlier in fare evasion, but real progress.

Unfortunately, that progress has stalled after just a month. WMATA released their bus ridership data for July 2026, and the fare payment rate is stuck at ~36%. That's not anywhere near the sustained progress that's needed.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 2 days ago
▲ 2 r/WMATA

A Modest Proposal: Use the Out of Service Buses on Wisconsin

There‘s been a very noticeable uptick in out of service buses running along Wisconsin Avenue, apparently to/from the Western Bus Garage. Meanwhile, headways on Wisconsin remain a challenge for WMATA.

Here’s a modest proposal: let passengers hop on. Running these buses as a limited Wisconsin Avenue service (say, between Friendship Heights and Woodley) could significantly improve headways along the corridor, with little impact on operations.

What do folks think?

Edit: look, argue against this on Wisconsin Avenue all you want, but the concept isn't categorically outlandish. There are plenty of transit agencies worldwide that run service when pulling out of or into a depot, run routes where a depot is a terminus, or have a policy of allowing passengers on depot runs. There are tradeoffs between deadheading and running service to/from a depot.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 6 days ago

Strata Gen 2 - Classic and Nitrided Pans

Strata just posted the preorder for what they're calling Gen 2, a design refresh to their carbon steel clad pans plus a nitrided option. Looks like they've made some good (minor) improvements, including increased thickness and a more proportional handle on the small pan.

https://www.stratacookware.com/product-page/12-5-carbon-clad-nitrided-3-ply-carbon-steel-frying-pan-gen-2

I wonder how this is going to do against Misen's carbon clad line and the new titanium pan constructions.

u/dclocal12 — 8 days ago
▲ 57 r/WMATA

WaPo: Fearing violence, some Metro bus drivers are bucking order to announce fare

What an own goal by WMATA's leadership. They introduced this performative and ineffectual policy to placate conservative critics. Now it's getting thrown back at them by WaPo, recycling transit union talking points.

washingtonpost.com
u/dclocal12 — 9 days ago

Could there be a rule on the National Military Monument requests?

There have been more and more requests for photos of names on the USAA National Military Monument. Could there be a subreddit rule on this to limit the clutter? Maybe something like a single thread for people who want to ask? Thanks.

(I'm not taking a position here on whether this is a meaningful monument or a PR stunt for USAA, just the many requests for photos. Thanks to all who served.)

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 10 days ago
▲ 9 r/WMATA

Another morning on Wisconsin Avenue

These were supposed to be 5-10 minute headways. It’s a Friday in August with good weather, this is literally as good as a morning commute is going to get. And yet WMATA still can’t deliver reliable service. Metrobus is fundamentally broken.

u/dclocal12 — 13 days ago
▲ 22 r/WMATA

Metro Pulse - two steps forward, one step back (2.0.4)

WMATA released an update to the Metro Pulse app this morning (2.0.4). I've been very critical of the app before, and it doesn't get a lot of love on here, so I want to flag that there are a few real improvements.

  • The app loads much faster than before. I measured launching from a cold start into the Favorites tab with fully visible and populated data at 1.45 seconds. That's roughly a 2x speedup since the 2.0 launch (2.88 seconds), though still much slower than Metro ETA (1.12 seconds).
  • The Favorites tab is now a dashboard view of lines, stops, and places. It no longer has a map that clutters the display and is duplicative of the Explore tab.
  • The navigation bar at the bottom has been restyled with a design that's more cohesive. It's not how I would have designed the app (a native bar would've been preferable), but it's a reasonable choice and an improvement (on an iPhone, it still looks ridiculous on an iPad).

So that's the good news. Unfortunately, the app still has lots of UI pop-in, jank, and inconsistency. Profile syncing is still broken. There are also new bugs, like how rail routes sometimes only display one direction (did nobody test this?!).

Overall, it's still a mediocre app, and the performance by WMATA's contractor (CAI) remains utterly unacceptable. But there is some progress.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 16 days ago
▲ 56 r/WMATA

Just another rush hour on the C51

These are supposed to be 20-minute headways, which is already way too infrequent. The C51 has a distinctly valuable route, but the service WMATA runs is complete garbage.

u/dclocal12 — 21 days ago

The Trump plan for Dulles is... parking

This afternoon, Trump announced his grand vision for a redeveloped Dulles airport. The centerpiece is... a giant parking garage, running along the entire front of the iconic Eero Saarinen terminal. Seriously.

https://preview.redd.it/2f9pzowpd8gh1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b10da8de9174626eeff9fb18367da592f6cb40b1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0-6jdZ_q6g

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/07/28/trump-set-unveil-dulles-makeover-after-months-personal-edits/

https://www.united.com/en/us/newsroom/announcements/cision-125476

I was trying to hold out hope that there might be some good that could come of this, since Dulles does need a lot of work. Alas, the hope was in vain.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 21 days ago

Strata griddle imminent?

A few hints that u/stratapan is about to announce a carbon steel clad griddle...

A couple of weeks ago, on a post about griddled french toast, someone asked about a Strata griddle. The response: "Working on it!"

Last week, on a post about Strata's wok: "Pro is not coming out this year...but, since you're asking, we will be announcing something else in 1-2 weeks"

This week, an Instagram post of french toast: "An even cook every time. Gotta love that aluminum core 😉" (I might be overreading this one, since there's a pan in the picture.)

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 22 days ago
▲ 20 r/WMATA

Wisconsin Avenue meltdown, again

A long stretch of Wisconsin Avenue is closed because of the Graham funeral. This was previously announced by MPD. But communication from WMATA about bus rerouting or headways? Nothing beyond a generic detour notice, posted late, which doesn’t even show up in Metro Pulse. And buried in a bunch of other alerts. Working real-time ETAs? Completely nonexistent. Yet another bus service disaster on Wisconsin Avenue, one of DC’s busiest transit routes.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 23 days ago
▲ 135 r/WMATA+1 crossposts

The 51st: Metro tried to make bus service better. Somehow, ridership and speeds are both down

https://51st.news/metro-tried-to-make-bus-service-better-somehow-ridership-and-speeds-are-both-down/

This is a helpful overview of the current state of Metrobus service, including the impact of the Better Bus initiative. It’s… not good, and in key ways it’s getting worse.

The article does hedge a bit more than it needs to—this isn’t a mystery in what’s making bus service bad and who’s responsible. Obviously the main problem is lack of bus priority infrastructure! And that’s controlled by DDOT and Bowser, who barely get a mention!

It’s also disheartening that nobody is offering real solutions here. Randy Clarke emphasized the Gold Line… sure, that’s good, but it’s just one route in 4-5 years. We need an entire regional network of bus lanes ASAP. There’s also a lot more that WMATA could be doing now to improve bus service (e.g., active headway management and express routes around congestion).

u/dclocal12 — 25 days ago
▲ 45 r/WMATA

Just another morning on the D80

These are supposed to be 5-6 minute peak headways. There is so much more that WMATA can and should be doing to improve Metrobus, but for whatever reason, Randy Clarke and his leadership team have let bus service remain atrocious.

u/dclocal12 — 30 days ago
▲ 45 r/WMATA

Bus Fare Evasion and Enforcement: What the Numbers Say

In late May, WMATA announced that it was making a major push in bus fare enforcement and rider education. I will readily admit I was skeptical that the campaign, "Fares Pay for Service," would accomplish much. That seemed to be a common perspective.

https://www.wmata.com/news/metro-launches--fares-pay-for-service--campaign-to-support-safe-.html

After taking a close look at WMATA's fare compliance and enforcement statistics, I'm happy to report that I was wrong. The bus fare enforcement campaign is starting to work. There's still a very long way to go, and success is far from certain, but WMATA has genuinely turned a corner.

https://preview.redd.it/su4nef54msdh1.png?width=1659&format=png&auto=webp&s=c2297a08e4a95ccb789b84c668debe9d03732923

https://preview.redd.it/q8jie8p5gsdh1.png?width=2488&format=png&auto=webp&s=673ae1678dda9bb00423f60714d11547b0dd1dfc

Let's start with how fare compliance became such a problem for Metrobus. In the late 2010s, fare payment was at roughly 70-75% of riders. Not great, and slowly trending downward, but within the normal range for a major U.S. bus system. Then three things happened, which cratered bus fare payment.

  1. The Covid pandemic started to hit, and fare compliance (at least arguably) dipped a smidge to ~65%.
  2. WMATA made the bus network fare free from March 2020 to January 2021, sending fare payment (intentionally) to 0%. Reasonable minds can disagree about whether WMATA was right to make Metrobus free, or free for so long, but this much is certain: 10 months of free bus service radically changed payment patterns, and they never recovered. Immediately after fare reinstatement, payment was at just 50-55%, a huge drop from the pre-pandemic numbers.
  3. WMATA did essentially no fare enforcement from 2020 to 2022, and it did limited fare enforcement in 2023. The bus payment rate continued drifting significantly downward, ultimately reaching 25-30% for the past couple of years. Given the lack of a specific impetus, this is almost certainly attributable to the lack of enforcement, combined with changing norms. Riders saw other riders not paying and became accustomed to not paying.

So that's how WMATA dug itself into a very deep hole with bus fare payment: the pandemic did a little, but mostly it was eliminating fares for a long time, followed by not enforcing the resumption of fares and then tolerating low payment rates for years.

WMATA significantly ramped up its overall fare enforcement in 2024, hitting a record high. Then it hit a record again in 2025, and we're on track for another new record in 2026. While it's somewhat difficult to disentangle rail and bus fare enforcement in WMATA's statistics, that multiyear effort appears to have been overwhelmingly rail fare enforcement. (Which, alongside the new fare gates, has been a huge success at limiting rail fare evasion.)

That brings us to now. WMATA bus fare enforcement has very visibly increased. MTPD doesn't consistently report bus-specific fare enforcement numbers, unfortunately. But this much is certain: Bus law enforcement incidents, which includes fare enforcement, spiked 2x from June 2025 to June 2026. The bus fare payment rate for June 2026, the first full month after WMATA launched its campaign, is 37%. That's a month-to-month jump of ~10% and a level of bus fare payment that WMATA hasn't had since January 2023.

To emphasize, this is still a very deep hole for WMATA. The bus fare payment rate is still extraordinarily low, both in comparison to the 2010s and other major urban bus networks. It took years to make this mess, and it's going to take a long time to get out of it. I also remain skeptical that the current level of bus fare enforcement will be enough, and it's unclear how long WMATA will keep up its campaign. But at least so far, this is a real effort with real preliminary results.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 1 month ago
▲ 59 r/WMATA

How WMATA fudges the numbers on customer satisfaction

I've previously written about the problems with WMATA's bus on-time performance metric, which is both poorly designed and a national outlier in how lax it is. Inspired by this week's unimpressive board presentation about bus service, I want to explain how WMATA's customer satisfaction metrics are also bad and deceptive.

WMATA reports "customer satisfaction" scores for rail and bus. These scores are based on responses to an ongoing survey of people in the region, conducted by mail to randomly sampled addresses, with oversampling for lower-income areas to account for lower response rates. So far so good.

Now onto the problems.

  • The survey only includes people who are "active riders." That means it completely ignores the (many) people who are so dissatisfied with WMATA that they aren't regularly using public transit. In statistics terminology, this is a survivorship bias in the data.
  • A response of "Very satisfied" or "Satisfied" is treated as a satisfied customer, and everything else is treated as an unsatisfied customer. That artificially collapses the range of responses. Rating a 4 out of 5 just isn't the same as 5 out of 5, whatever words are put on it. And rating a 1 out of 5 certainly isn't the same as a 3 out of 5. In survey terminology, this is a use of a top-2 box score, which is unnecessary and unjustified here, and which will tend to look better than other ways of presenting the data.
  • The customer satisfaction questions are only about the respondent's most recent bus or rail trip, not about their overall experience with bus or rail service. In survey design terminology, this is a transactional satisfaction question instead of a relational satisfaction question. Relational satisfaction captures the overall customer experience, over time and across trips, and considering the entire transit network and alternatives to public transit. Transactional satisfaction only captures a particular trip, which a person chose to go through with. You can't just aggregate transactional satisfaction responses to understand relational satisfaction, as WMATA does—they're measuring fundamentally different things. This approach introduces a bunch of issues.
    • Asking the question this way neglects the nonlinear relationship between individual trip quality and overall public transit quality. A public transit system that completely fails in 1 of 5 trips isn't an 80% good system. It's a terrible transit system that can't be relied on.
    • Similarly, designing the customer satisfaction metric this way treats all trips as equal. But all trips aren't equal. A system that works well on nights and weekends but poorly during commute hours isn't a viable system. This is another way in which there is a nonlinear relationship between individual trips and overall satisfaction.
    • If a customer wasn't able to take a trip with WMATA because the network failed (e.g., the bus never showed up), that won't be captured. In other words, the customer satisfaction metric systematically excludes the worst trips. This is a missing not at random bias in the metric.
    • Customers take the bus and train lines that work for them and avoid lines that are problematic. So, it's less likely that the most recent ride will be on a problematic line. This is a form of self-selection bias.
    • When people take the mailed survey, they're going to be at home, and it'll probably be at night or on a weekend. That induces possible sampling bias in what the most recent rides will be. WMATA's worst service is during morning peak hours, and this approach will undersample those rides.
    • Asking about how a particular trip went means (at least to some extent) taking the lines and service levels as they currently are, not as they were or could be. More precisely, the survey design misses foregone or eliminated counterfactuals. This is going to (at least partly) miss changes like the Better Bus network redesign, where the alternative trip (which can no longer be taken) would have been better. This is also going to (at least partly) miss reductions or potential increases in service frequency or express routes. In essence, the survey inherently measures service delivered in comparison to scheduled service, rather than in comparison to the counterfactual service that the region needs.
    • The question focuses on the trip, not how the network performed overall. That may exclude instances where a line failed and the customer had to take their trip a different way (e.g., walk to a different line). Again, this is a missed counterfactual in the survey design.
  • WMATA reports aggregate customer satisfaction, without breaking down results by line or area. That masks poor satisfaction for some parts of the network with good satisfaction for others. More precisely, this is an aggregation bias. It also makes the metric susceptible to Simpson's paradox, where the overall trend in the metric can mask opposite trends for parts of the network.
  • The targets for customer satisfaction are 85% for rail and 78% for bus. Why those numbers? Why do bus customers deserve to be much less happy than rail customers? WMATA provides no meaningful justification.
  • WMATA characterizes current bus customer satisfaction (in the 70-80% range) as "high." That is delusional. As a (quite rough) point of comparison, if you saw an Uber driver with a score of below 4.0, you'd run.
  • WMATA compares its customer satisfaction scores to those for other transit agencies and concludes that it's doing well. That's not just misleading, it's outright deceptive. Other agencies compute this differently (like MTA below), in ways that are more helpful but result in lower scores. But WMATA treats the comparison as apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

What should WMATA do differently? MTA in NYC is a good example. They collect this type of "most recent trip" satisfaction data, but it isn't their core customer satisfaction metric. Rather, that's overall satisfaction with the buses and the trains. MTA also reports the full distribution of survey data (not just top-2 box scores or averages), and they provide breakdowns by line and area. It's not perfect, but it's way better than WMATA's approach.

In case this all sounds academic, consider WMATA's 2022 Better Bus survey. It was online and open to the public, which creates plenty of other biases. But even taking it with a big grain of salt: only 45% of respondents rated bus service as very good or excellent, far below what WMATA reported for its contemporaneous customer satisfaction scores.

Here's another example: in 2007, when WMATA ran its usual (bad) customer satisfaction survey, the bus satisfaction score was 81%. But WMATA also conducted a second survey with a much better design, asking overall perception questions and reaching non-transit riders. In that second survey, when WMATA asked if Metrobus was an excellent way to travel in the area? Only 30%. Easy and convenient to use? 27%. Gets you to your destination on time? 19%. WMATA also compared the responses to satisfaction with private cars, which trounced bus satisfaction.

The bottom line is that WMATA has designed its core customer satisfaction metric in a way that systematically inflates scores, and they use the metric in ways that are outright deceptive. The board should fix this, just like it should fix the bus on-time performance metric.

u/dclocal12 — 2 months ago
▲ 29 r/WMATA

What should the next DC Mayor do?

Based on the election returns, it looks like JLG will presumptively be the next Mayor of DC. She’s promised to be much more pro-transit than Bowser.

So… what do you think the next Mayor should do to improve public transit in DC? Quick-build bus lanes for all major routes comes to mind.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 2 months ago
▲ 4 r/WMATA

Metro Pulse "Improved performance"

An update to the Metro Pulse app shipped today, claiming "Improved performance" in the release notes. While there's been some evident tinkering with the app's loading behavior (which looks a bit different), and it is noticeably faster than the last version, I'm sorry to report that it's still slow and buggy overall.

Loading the updated favorites dashboard took 2.34 seconds, down from 2.88 seconds in the last version, but still much slower than Metro ETA, Transit, and Metro Hero. The favorites also still don't work right, and the map still has loads of stutter and pop-in, among other remaining issues.

Lots more detail here, for those curious:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WMATA/comments/1tyq3tj/benchmarking_metro_apps_yes_metro_pulse_is_that/

https://www.reddit.com/r/WMATA/comments/1tsprl9/metro_pulse_20_is_live/

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 2 months ago

Nick (?) on replacement AirPods Pro 3 bud

I got my AirPods Pro 3 buds replaced because they kept refusing to connect and instead showed they were still in the case charging. The replacement buds have worked fine, but one of the buds arrived with a small dark nick in it (or maybe a defect in the plastic casting?). That's kinda annoying, especially since the buds I sent in were in perfect condition. I decided it was clearly only cosmetic and not worth the hassle of another replacement, but I'm mentioning it here as another data point that Apple's quality control for the AirPods Pro 3 leaves something to be desired.

Edit: look, downvote me if you want. I'm not saying this is a big deal. But it is a QC failure and un-Apple-like, and if people were getting new buds like this they'd be miffed. There's been a lot of discussion about QC on the AirPods Pro 3, and I couldn't find any other posts discussing these issues on a replacement. The main takeaway is that folks should carefully check their replacements as soon as they open them and not assume that they'll be in perfect condition.

u/dclocal12 — 2 months ago
▲ 26 r/WMATA

Benchmarking Metro Apps - Yes, Metro Pulse Is That Slow and Buggy

Inspired by the discussion about Metro ETA, the new Metro dashboard app that's generated so much interest, I thought it might be helpful to benchmark the various popular Metro apps.

I measured each app on my iPhone 17 Pro, using screen recordings for precision. The time is how long it took starting from when I tapped the app icon. I did a force quit of each app before the measurement and waited several minutes, both for a consistent baseline (needing to load the app and Metro data fresh) and since typically (at least for me) when I launch one of these apps it's been awhile. I also set Metro Pulse to open to the favorites tab since that's realistic for a frequent rider.

Here's what I found.

  • Metro ETA
    • 0.90 seconds - dashboard with current information starts sliding into view
    • 1.12 seconds - dashboard is fully in view
    • 1.69 seconds - map zoom animation is complete
  • Transit
    • 0.89 seconds - loading screen faded out, street map layer starts rendering
    • 1.11 seconds - street map layer fully rendered, dashboard with current information starts sliding into view
    • 1.49 seconds - rail/bus map layer fully rendered, dashboard is fully in view
  • Metro Pulse
    • 2.23 seconds - opening animation completes, showing a blank page
    • 2.79 seconds - rail map layer renders, but is centered at Metro Center, which is nowhere near me
    • 2.83 seconds - dashboard with current information starts sliding into view, but the favorites are wrong and useless (seemingly a profile data sync error)
    • 2.88 seconds - dashboard is fully in view
    • 2.96 seconds - street map layer starts rendering
    • 3.01 seconds - map recenters about two blocks south of where it was, still nowhere near me
    • 3.35 seconds - street map layer finishes rendering

A pretty embarrassing showing for WMATA. Metro Pulse is very clearly slow and buggy.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 2 months ago
▲ 47 r/WMATA

Metro Pulse 2.0 Is Live

The updated Metro Pulse mobile app is now live (as WMATA promised for today), and you can get it by force updating the app on your phone (or just waiting for auto-update). I wasn’t in the beta test, so I hadn’t tried it out before. These impressions are from the iPhone version because that’s what I have.

The good:

  • The UI has had a complete reskin to match WMATA’s brown unified style. It mostly looks good and is consistent. There are a few iffy choices (especially bright purple for menu selections), but on the whole, a big step forward. The old app, by comparison, was mostly generic blue and white.
  • The location system (your location, search location, and stop locations) has been reworked and actually makes sense now. In the older version of the app, there was a weird interplay between locations that made map navigation counterintuitive and a struggle. The map also often defaulted to Metro Center.
  • The favorites system has also been reworked and makes much more sense now. You can favorite lines or stops, and you can easily rearrange the favorites list. The old version of the app had a half-baked favorites system that was annoying to manage and didn’t reliably work.
  • You can set the app to open to a specific tab. For most folks, setting it to favorites will make sense.
  • The app help menu and offline maps menu have refreshed assets. The prior app had dodgy screenshots in the app help menu and less helpful offline maps.

Room for improvement in the app:

  • Bus stops, buses, and trains remain slow to render and pop into the map with a lag. Relatedly, the map can stutter when panning. This is definitely the same Metro Pulse app under the hood, with a lot of room for performance improvement.
  • The map still loads at Metro Center sometimes, then it snaps to your location after a moment. Again, same app under the hood.
  • The logic for matching your location to a favorited bus or rail line isn’t quite right. Sometimes the favorite menu doesn‘t show the closest rail stop on the line, for example. And if you’re roughly equidistant between two northbound and southbound pairs of bus stops, the favorite menu isn’t smart enough to recognize that, and it’ll split the pairs showing northbound from one place and southbound from another.
  • The main navigation bar at the bottom isn’t native, and it shows. It doesn’t match the iOS style and can conflict with swiping up to switch apps.
  • There isn’t a way to fully dismiss the drawer when looking at a map.
  • The app launch graphic is an unnecessary delay and doesn't correctly render as full screen (there are visible gaps at the borders).
  • It’s possible to spin the map with a two-finger gesture, but there is no button to reorient the map. The recentering button doesn’t reorient the map.
  • There isn’t an evident way to favorite a line from a bus stop or train station. You have to search for the line by name.
  • The rail stations don’t show entrances or exits and inconsistently show elevators.

Missed opportunities:

  • There’s no meaningful iOS integration beyond the app itself. A widget for upcoming arrivals at favorited stops would be valuable. Same for a watch display of that information.
  • There isn’t SmarTrip integration beyond an embedded web browser. WMATA says this is coming later.
  • Performance data has been pretty much removed from the app. That’s mostly fine, since the app should be focused on riding and there’s a website for tracking performance. The performance data in the last version of the app was also mostly useless and presented poorly. That said, bringing back some live indicators (even optional) about speed and headway adherence would be valuable. That’s the data that made MetroHero so popular for frequent riders.

Big picture, this is a comprehensive and meaningful improvement. The app is much nicer to use, and WMATA deserves the victory lap they’re taking with it.

At the same time, I’m still left scratching my head about the app development process... why did it take so long to address so many basic issues, and why are some still unaddressed? Why wait for a major 2.0 release and then drop it at midnight on a Sunday? Why is the UI completely proprietary rather than native? This still feels like government software development that’s been contracted out and finally hit a minimum viable release target, rather than an app owned by WMATA that’s making continuous progress. It’s a good app, but it can and should be a great app.

Edit: Tried the app out on iPad, too. Oof. The navigation bar is comically oversized, there are overlay bugs with the navigation bar and the drawer in the explore and favorites tabs, font sizes are inconsistent, keyboard and mouse navigation are inconsistent, the app icon and in-app icons don’t always render cleanly (maybe they aren’t vector graphics or rendered to the right resolutions?), and the layouts break in some window sizes. The app is usable, but it’s obvious that this wasn’t a priority, and all the downsides of (unnecessarily) using a proprietary UI framework are on full display.

Edit 2: The favorites list is bugged. The list keeps adding new entries and rearranging entries. I suspect this is broken syncing, based on data from the last version of the app. It’s really frustrating to see how much individual developers can build when the official WMATA app has so many basic problems.

Edit 3: The morning after app rollout, live rail and bus tracking is broken. That makes the app unusable. Come on WMATA, this isn’t acceptable. Hire some competent developers.

reddit.com
u/dclocal12 — 3 months ago