
First roll with 1924 Brownie Model F - Thinking I should use faster film.
So I picked up a halfway decent Box Brownie (brown leather) at a local antique store for $25 over the weekend. I pulled it apart, cleaned and lubricated the shutter, cleaned the lens and viewfinders, and did a little testing. First, i checked the shutter, and it runs about 1/45 second (20 cycles, slowest cycle 1/39, fastest cycle 1/51). I measured the three apertures and calculated out the f-stops to be f16 (all the way in), f21 (middle postion), and f35 (all the way out).
I ran a roll of Catlabs 80 film through it as a test, mostly because it was what I had handy. Conditions were bright, what I'd consider a f11 to f16 exposure on the Sunny Sixteen rule of thumb. House picture would qualify as a bright subject, in full sun. Picnic table with cat would was in full light, but not as bright. The film was semi-stand processed in Rodinal 1:100, direct contact print on Foma Fomaspeed Variant, Ilford #2 filter in the enlarger because I forgot to take it out.
At the tightest aperture, the negatives are underexposed, and at the widest aperture, the exposure is close to right - maybe a little overexposed for a bright subject. At the widest aperture, the shot of the cat in the shady ferns is badly underexposed. Photo of my (redacted) wife was wide open aperture under bright haze.
Lots of words getting to the gist of the question, but based on this test roll I'm thinking I would be best served to use a faster film. My napkin estimates tell me that iso 200 would be a bit slow for a Sunny Sixteen day, and iso 400 would be about right. Does this sound about right? I'm pretty happy with the results of the first test results, and wouldn't mind trying to make some intentional photos with the camera. Who needs multiple element lenses?