
u/fattick-

Where are all the stars if they were on the moon? And how were they soo chill? The video was upscaled, interpolated to 60FPS and synchronized mission audio from the Apollo flight journal.
The absence of stars in Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) photos and video feeds comes down to camera exposure settings during broad daylight.
1. It Was Daytime on the Moon
Every Apollo landing—and all Lunar Rover EVAs (Apollos 15, 16, and 17)—took place during the lunar day. Even though the lunar sky appears pitch black because the Moon has no atmosphere to scatter light, the Sun was blazing in the sky. The bright white spacesuits, metal rover chassis, and light-gray lunar soil were reflecting intense sunlight.
2. Camera Exposure Limits (Dynamic Range)
Photographic film and digital sensors cannot simultaneously capture extremely bright sunlit subjects and extremely faint starlight in a single shot:
Daylight Settings: To capture a crisp image of an astronaut or the rover without making them a blinding white blur, the 70mm Hasselblad cameras were set to fast shutter speeds (e.g., 1/250s) and small apertures (f/8 or f/11).
Faint Starlight: Stars emit very little light relative to a sunlit object. At fast shutter speeds, starlight simply does not hit the film long enough to leave an impression.
######
Imagine taking a picture of a friend standing directly under a brilliant stadium floodlight at night. If you adjust your phone camera so your friend's face is clearly visible, the faint stars in the sky behind the stadium won't show up in the photo.
If you force the camera to capture the faint stars, your friend's face will turn into a blinding white glare.
#######
Video from Moonpans.
If the oceans and seas were this rough in the past too, how did the historic ships explorers used complete their voyages across the oceans and seas?
Why are space photos colorful if the cameras used to capture them only see in black and white - Monochrome?
Space cameras and massive telescopes (like Hubble, JWST, or amateur astrophotography rigs) capture raw data using monochrome (black and white) sensors. They don't take color snapshots the way a smartphone does.
Instead, astrophotographers put narrowband physical glass filters in front of the black-and-white sensor. These filters block almost all light except for the exact, specific wavelengths emitted by excited atoms in the gas cloud:
Sulfur-II (SII): Emits in deep red (mapped to Red in post-processing).
Hydrogen-Alpha (H-α): Emits in bright red (mapped to Green in the classic Hubble Palette to prevent red from overpowering everything).
Oxygen-III (O-III): Emits in blue-green (mapped to Blue).
So when people see a colorful image of the Rosetta Nebula, the colors are not fake "paint." They are a chemical map. The colors assign a specific visual channel to raw photon data emitted by distinct elements
We are made of Star stuff. Every biological organism, non-living structure, and chemical process on Earth uses the same baseline library of elements distributed through space by star-forming regions like the Rosetta Nebula.
Look down at your hands for a second.
The hydrogen atoms in the water molecules of your body were created in the immediate aftermath of the Big Bang nearly 13.8 billion years ago. They are as old as time itself.
But what about everything else?
The iron binding oxygen in your red blood cells, the calcium hardening your skeleton, the carbon forming your DNA, and the silicon in the device you are reading this on—none of those existed in the early universe.
They required a cosmic furnace.
1. Stellar Fusion (The Light Elements)
For millions of years, massive stars fuse hydrogen into helium, then helium into carbon, oxygen, neon, and silicon. The star spends its lifetime fighting its own gravitational collapse by burning lighter elements into heavier ones.
2. Supernovae & Collisions (The Heavy Elements)
Once a star's core fuses into iron, it can no longer extract energy from fusion. The core collapses in a fraction of a second, resulting in a core-collapse supernova. The violent shockwave—along with neutron star mergers (kilonovae)—forces rapid neutron capture (the r-process), forging the heaviest elements in the periodic table like gold, platinum, and iodine.
3. Cosmic Recycling
These cataclysmic explosions blast millions of tons of enriched matter out into the interstellar medium at thousands of kilometers per second. Over cosmic timescales, those shockwaves compress giant molecular clouds, triggering the birth of new solar systems—including our own Sun, Earth, and eventually, us.
The Bottom Line:
Every biological organism, non-living structure, and chemical process on Earth uses the same baseline library of elements distributed through space by star-forming regions like the Rosetta Nebula. The boundary between "living things" and "non-living things" is simply how those stellar-forged atoms are arranged.
Mars approached perihelion 187 days ago which is the standard new year for an orbiting object. But Mars new year isn't measured from perihelion at all. It is measured from a seasonal calendar and Tomorrow sep 30 at UTC 11:43, Mars starts a new year.
spent the morning staring at astlo's calculations wondering why my output didn't align with ESA's "Mars New Year" announcement. Turns out I fell into a classic astrodynamics trap:
True Anomaly (nu) measures the angle from Perihelion (closest approach to the Sun). The engine correctly showed Mars passed perihelion ~187 sols ago.
Mars New Year isn't measured from perihelion at all. It starts at the Northern Spring Equinox (L_s = 0°).
Because Mars has an eccentric orbit and a 25.2° axial tilt, its spring equinox happens when the true anomaly is approx 110°—putting Mars Year 39 starting right now
A quick sanity check on why it's "Year 39":
Planetary scientists (led by Todd Clancy back in 2000) retroactively marked Mars Year 1 as starting on April 11, 1955 (coinciding with a massive global dust storm on Mars). Since one Martian orbit takes ~687 Earth days, New Year shifts backward on our calendar every time.
MY 37: Dec 26, 2022
MY 38: Nov 12, 2024
MY 39: Sept 30, 2026 👈
The physics engine was right all along. My brain just needed a quick recalibration on seasonal calendars vs. orbital geometry.
UTC 11:43 is EAT 1443 hrs...
Happy Mars Year 39
light itself even visible light, is completely invisible until it interacts with matter. Thought experiment in post body...
Imagine stepping into a completely sealed, pitch-black room with a high-powered laser pointer.
If you turn that laser on and point it at the far wall, what do you actually see? You see a bright red dot on the wall where the photons hit the paint. But in a clean, dust-free room, you don't see the beam cutting through the air. The space between your hand and the wall remains pitch black.
Why? Because light itself is invisible in transit.
You only see the beam if you clap two dusty chalk erasers together over the path. The moment dust particles drift into the light, photons collide with the particles and scatter toward your eyes (Tyndall effect / Rayleigh scattering).
The exact same thing happens in space on a cosmic scale. Space is continuously flooded with intense, high-flux sunlight, yet the background is a pitch-black void. Without gas, dust, or an atmosphere in the vacuum to scatter those photons toward your lens, the journey of light itself leaves zero trace. You only see it the nanosecond it collides with something—a planet, a solar array, or a moon.
It’s an existential realization, but it’s also grounding. Staring at that small blue dot in the black void puts all daily stress and overthinking into perspective. It makes you realize how trivial most worries are and pushes you to just stop stressing and LIVE.
:-(
The Geocentric values and the Full moon detection needs fixing. Full moon happens at 100% But still at 98% illumination, we shall perceive it as full moon. When does a Waxing Gibbous become a Full Moon? Astlo says 95% (Sept 24), but astronomical opposition isn't until Sept 26 at 100% illumination!
Here’s a quick output snapshot computing the Sun’s relative state for Nairobi, Kenya (1.28639° S, 36.81722° E, 1,795m altitude) as of Sept 22, 2026, 12:08 UTC (3:08 PM EAT). The Sun is the closest star to Earth.
Elevation Angle: 48.71° (Sun setting towards West-Northwest in the second quadrant of the local sky).
Azimuth Angle: 271.98°
Slant Range:150,149,213 km (~1.0037 AU)
Light Travel Time: 8 minutes 20.8 seconds (It took over 8 minutes for those photons hitting Nairobi then to leave the solar surface!)
2. Runge-Kutta 4th Order (RK4) State Refinement
Using the 4th order Runge-Kutta integrator with a Delta t = 1 hour step size, astlo computes the full vector dynamics relative to the Solar System Barycenter (SSB) in J2000 coordinates:
SSB Velocity Magnitude: 11,304.54 m/s (~11.3 km/s relative to SSB frame)
Gravitational Acceleration Magnitude: 1.475*10^-7m/s^2 or 1.475e-7m/s²
Specific Mechanical Energy: -520,006.97 m²s². This means that the sun is gravitational bound by the SSB Solar System Barycenter. It is also captured in orbit 💫
Angular Momentum (h): 8.143*10^13 m²/s or 8.142e13 m²/s
A miniature rocket that uses Water to generate thrust.
Imagine living 5-km deep below the ocean surface and never knowing that there is an end to the water or that there are other life forms living outside the water. Or that there are stars in the night sky. Maybe we Humans too are like those fish. Thinking we've seen and discovered it all but No.
Don't Andromedans also see the Milky way in their night skies? :-(
Milky Way galactic core.
This is Lonely. It was taken by the Curiosity rover's Navigation Camera (Navcam) on Sol 29 (September 5, 2012). Looking backward, it captures the wheel tracks left in the Martian sand dune ripple after the rover completed what was then its longest drive since landing in Gale Crater.
Setting personal boundaries on a shared planet: Moving forward like a solitary rover leaving tracks behind.