Unsure about SLI or some other type
Personally, I feel like I'm a more imaginative SLI who has learned how to clumsily navigate social dynamics. What makes me second-guess this is that I actually possess a lot of internal sentimentality. I also think I might be a bit too eager to open up about my inner feelings and personal experiences with close friends for a typical Fi-mobilizing type.
Also I'm a big daydreamer and romantic. I fantasize romantic scenarios in my head all the time, ponder a lot about existential issues, and I like to help my partners with their inner worlds and care for their emotions, while still caring for them physically and protecting them. Doesn't fit the boring unimaginative SLI curmudgeon stereotype.
I consider myself socially ambiverted, leaning towards introverted.
That said, I’m almost 100% certain I’m a Si-ego type (or at the very least, Si-mobilizing+). I would describe my relation to Si and Se as homeostasis:
- If I’m energized, I’ll keep going until I’m completely exhausted or the task is finished. But if I’m lounging around, it’s incredibly hard for me to snap out of it and get moving.
- I focus heavily on sensory comfort; bad smells and body pain throw me completely off balance. I actively dislike conflict and confrontation. However, if I feel like I'm being pushed, I have to consciously restrain myself from lashing out. Strong emotions overwhelm me internally, and makes it hard to think or concentrate, so I try to keep calm at all times. I love eating, drinking, sensorial pleasures, and I tend to fall on stress eating to cope with stress or anxiety.
- I can't stand pushy, physically overbearing people. It makes me tense up and want to push back. I’d always prefer to resolve things peacefully without ruffling any feathers.
- If I notice someone needs help or is in distress, I will step in and try to fix the situation for them as I see fit, check in on them, a pat to the shoulder. If I think that I need to mobilize people and assert myself, I can do it naturally and comfortably, sometimes even inadequately (asking higher ups to do stuff for me, asking people directly for information etc).
- I suck at using my hands and concentrating on minucious little tasks that require coordination drain me pretty quick. Too much nitpicking about physical organization and schedules are grating to me too, but I strive to be as clean and tidy as possible.
Fi and Fe:
- My Fi isn't high enough to be an EII. I prefer to skip small talk as quickly as possible to get to deep, interesting topics. Because of this, I can sometimes disregard boundaries and come across as too direct or brash. It’s never intentional, and most of the time, I don’t even realize I’m being invasive.
- That said, I’m tactful and perceptive enough to handle day-to-day interactions. I’m a good mediator, I quickly catch onto dishonesty or inconsistent behavior, and I get strong hunches about where relationships are heading (though I've had to learn to trust these hunches over time). I am very polite and formal, but I can mess it up and act awkward. But I'm awesome at interacting with people through roles (being a teacher, a attendant, etc).
- I suck at Fe. My default social mask is just a polite little smile and nodding along to what people say. While I’m quick to laugh and smile naturally, I have no idea how to ramp up the emotional atmosphere or act cheerful if I’m not feeling it.
- Because of this, I probably seem stiff and awkward to Fe-valuing types. I really don't know how to express myself out loud, bring up the vibe, act flirty, etc. I gesticulate and emote a lot when talking, especially if excited. I do know how to push people tho, and I can be somewhat intimidating (which I'm aware is Se).
Te and Ti:
- I firmly believe I value Te. I want to receive information as directly and quickly as possible. To me, what matters most is getting the job done. I prefer a step-by-step learning process where I figure things out as I go and polish the details along the way.
- I dislike reading dense, abstract blocks of information just to store them for no reason; I want to apply knowledge on a case-by-case basis. I have no shame in directly asking someone for information or the quickest way to do something. I like to relate concepts to concrete problems or people.
- It's not that I struggle with abstract concepts, theories, or principles, I just prefer to apply them to a specific interest or problem. Pure logical debate feels pedantic and annoying to me.
- However, I do care deeply about accuracy. I can be incredibly nitpicky about errors and inaccuracies in subjects I’m knowledgeable and passionate about, and I enjoy understanding how things work across different contexts and situations. I like explaining things to people and translating systems/complex things to them, helping them apply systems to their problems...
Given all of this, do you think that SLI is a good fit? Maybe other type would fit better?