u/gervazmar

Google appears to be removing the brand that created the listicle from Consideration as does ChatGPT
▲ 13 r/AISearchAnalytics+3 crossposts

Google appears to be removing the brand that created the listicle from Consideration as does ChatGPT

A lot of chatter about this on X, and I am seeing the same! Self-serving listices listing the brand is #1 may be used (and cited), but the brand is not mentioned...

Curious if others are seeing this:

X discussions for more examples:

u/annseosmarty — 10 days ago
▲ 15 r/GenEngineOptimization+2 crossposts

The question I keep getting: "We're running paid + seo in Germany/Spain/France/etc. Is it worth producing localized on-page and off-page content specifically for LLMs (ChatGPT/GoogleAIOverview/...) or is English sufficient?"

We pulled 7M AI citations from 350K prompts across Google AI Overview, Copilot, ChatGPT, and Grok in 6 non-English languages to find out.

Short answer: yes, but the payoff swings 30+ points depending on which AI search engine your audience uses.

Local language citation rate x model:

Market Google AIO Copilot ChatGPT Grok
Italian 90% 77% 74% 54%
German 90% 76% 66% 49%
Spanish 83% 84% 75% 55%
French 82% 87% 72% 59%
Swedish 85% 60% 57% 47%
Dutch 81% 66% 62% 38%

(Read it as: "if I produce German content, what % of the sources cited for German prompts will be in German?")

A practical rule of thumb from the data:

  • Audience mostly on Google AIO → local content has a ~80-90% hit rate across the board. Invest.
  • Audience split across engines → safest bet is bilingual content (strong local + strong English), especially for Germanic markets.

Does this match what anyone here is seeing?

Disclosure: I work at Temso AI (we build AI Agents for GEO/AEO). We used our infrastructure to collect and analyze the data. Data's ours. In case you are interested in our methodology just let me know.*

reddit.com
u/gervazmar — 24 days ago