A Tax Helper for Aussie Teachers - What can you claim?

A Tax Helper for Aussie Teachers - What can you claim?

Its that time again! I made this a few years ago to help me organise/remember what I could claim on tax. Theres a lot of little things you wouldn't think to write down that you can get some money back for.

Sharing here in case its useful to anybody :) Please do not take it as gospel - be aware of your own situation and what you can or cannot claim. On a basic level, if you're not using it for work then don't claim it.

Do let me know if you have questions or notice any issues :)

Aus Teacher Tax Helper

As a reference, I usually get about 4-5k tax back each year. I've put this up for $13.99. I guarantee it will pay for itself immediately in the tax refund. And by the way you can claim this tool on tax under work related self-education expenses, as a treat

u/heynoswearing — 1 day ago

I like to imagine humans having far more unique traits than color alone. Anyone else?

Like what if they had different temperaments and physical features instead of all being the same but different colours.?

u/heynoswearing — 4 days ago
▲ 435 r/ClaudeAI

The marketing around skills is so funny

Some guy will be like "this highly advanced workflow optimiser developed with Fable 5 completely transforms what Claude is capable of" and then you look at the skill and its just like "think hard before answering"

​

God you people are insufferable and I love you

reddit.com
u/heynoswearing — 20 days ago

How can I make my surprise twist land? (Opus 4.5 max plan)

Looking for some advice on improving emotional response consistency in a multi-agent campaign environment.

Current setup is a DM agent plus four player agents. I migrated away from human players about a year ago because I was finding that they introduced a lot of noise into the narrative. Since switching to agents, campaign quality has improved substantially. Character motivations are more consistent, plot threads don't get forgotten, and scheduling is obviously much easier.

The DM is Claude Opus with campaign state stored in markdown. Each player has a dedicated skill containing personality traits, flaws, goals, relationship matrices, speech patterns, and compressed session history. I originally kept everything in the system prompt, but token usage was getting out of control around session 60, so I moved most of it into skills and now load them dynamically based on context.

I've also got a few hooks running. One updates world state after every scene, one tracks character knowledge boundaries, and one generates memory summaries at the end of each session. Recently I've been experimenting with an "internal thoughts" hook that generates private reasoning for each player before they respond. This has improved party banter significantly.

The problem I'm trying to solve is surprise.

I've spent months building toward a major reveal involving one of the PCs secretly being connected to the campaign's primary antagonist. Structurally it's probably the strongest twist I've written. The setup is there, the foreshadowing is there, the payoff is there.

The agents understand that it's surprising. They correctly identify it as surprising. They generate dialogue indicating surprise, but they don't actually seem surprised.

I've tried increasing emotional weighting in the personality files, but then they start overreacting to minor reveals. I've tried adding a dedicated emotional processing stage before response generation, but that increased latency and didn't really improve the quality of the reaction.

Current pipeline is:

- DM generates reveal

- Knowledge boundary hook validates information exposure

- Player agents generate internal reaction

- Emotional consistency agent reviews reaction

- Personality agent rewrites reaction

The outputs are technically correct, but it still feels like they're going through the motions. Has anyone solved this?

I don't need them to be surprised. I need them to appreciate how surprising the twist is

reddit.com
u/heynoswearing — 25 days ago

Had a huge win with Claude today and just want to share. Knicks in 4

Been trying for 2 months to automate a part of my job, generating a certain 60 page document. Its meant to take 14 hours, doing it "manually" with Claude before I learned anything would take about 7 hours of manual fiddling. Id burn through a number of 5 hour windows.

As of today ive got it down to 11 minutes! All I do is press a button, it works for 11 minutes, and its done. Only uses 30% of my window.

Most of what I did was have Claude offload subtasks to Python scripts, then built a bunch of hooks and skills it uses along the way. Lot of time optimising for token efficiency on recommendation from this sub.

Insane! I love my robot

reddit.com
u/heynoswearing — 28 days ago

In Anchorman, the director correctly predicted the invention of both Jon Hamm and Adam Scott. Mad Men and Severance wouldn't come out for another 15 years.

u/heynoswearing — 1 month ago