Merchant failed to deliver my order. Am I really expected to pay the financing interest? (Finland)
Hi everyone,
I'm based in Finland and recently had a frustrating experience with VEVOR and Klarna.
I ordered an commercial ice cream machine for my small business and a vacuum sealer using Klarna's 24-month financing.
Here's what happened:
- VEVOR accepted my order.
- A shipment was created.
- The ice cream machine was never delivered.
- At one point, the carrier even marked it as "delivered", although I received nothing ???????
- I reported it as goods not received and waited while the case was investigated.
- Several weeks later, VEVOR refunded the ice cream machine and shipping fee.
During those weeks, my Klarna financing remained active, so €7.21 in interest accrued before the refund was processed.
Klarna explained that, under the financing agreement, the interest was calculated correctly because it accrued before the refund reached them. They have agreed to submit my case for a manual waiver review.
VEVOR, however, says they are only responsible for refunding the purchase price and will not reimburse the interest because it resulted from my chosen payment method.
I understand Klarna's explanation, but I struggle with VEVOR's position.
If VEVOR had delivered the machine as agreed or simply cancelled the unavailable item and refunded it immediately, there would have been no financing interest at all. The additional cost only arose because the order remained unresolved for weeks after VEVOR failed to fulfill it.
As a small business owner myself, I don't believe customers should be expected to absorb costs that arise directly from a business's own operational or logistics failures. If my mistake causes a customer a financial loss, I believe it's my responsibility to make them whole, not just apologize.
I'm not asking whether Klarna calculated the interest correctly. My question is about accountability.
When a seller fails to deliver a product and that delay directly causes an additional financial cost for the customer, who should ultimately bear that cost?
Has anyone in Finland experienced something similar with Klarna or another financing provider? How was it resolved?
EDIT:
- Many comments are focusing on the €7.21, but the amount isn't the point. Whether it was €0.70, €7.21, or €70, my question would be exactly the same.
- I've also removed the purchase price because it was distracting from the actual discussion.
This isn't really about Klarna's interest calculationI understand how the financing works.
It's about whether a business should be able to apologize for failing to deliver an order while leaving the customer to absorb the financial consequences of that failure.
To me, an apology should come with accountability.