

Noticed that in multiple scenes, Nikki was always at Bear's right and Sarah was always at Bear's left. Could any meaning be read into it? #obsession
Choose Only One
I prefer Sheep Detectives. Pleasant, Calm, yet Deep
Same DNA : Supernatural (2008) vs Obsession (2026)
Same trigger: supernatural wish to make someone love you
Same consequence: love turns into dangerous, suffocating obsession
Same theme: manufactured love is not love, it is possession
Same moral: the person who made the wish is the actual villain, even if they didn't intend to be
Bear x Nikki (Obsession) are parallel to Wes (lonely, unrequited love, supernatural means) x Hope (Normal woman obsessed by a wish)
Supernatural (Wishful Thinking)
Ladies & Ladies, a Geethu Mohandas Approach
Toxic New teaser address Ladies& Ladies, yet most of them are introduced through objectification rather than character. Never expected this from a director like Geetu Mohandas..who did that SAY IT moment
It's too early to judge but their Marketing is around these ladies rather than Rocking⭐
Let's Read Sheep Detectives: Not a Review
The Sheep Detectives isn't really a murder mystery. It's a movie about what happens when you can no longer afford to lie to yourself.
Here's the part that's easy to miss if you're just watching for the whodunit: the sheep in this film have built an entire belief system specifically designed to avoid pain.
They believe death doesn't exist — that when something "dies," it just becomes a cloud.
When anything uncomfortable happens, they can simply choose to forget it.
Not repress it. Choose to forget it, on purpose, as a flock.
That's not a cute worldbuilding detail. That's a coping mechanism, dressed up as sheep lore.
Sound familiar? It's basically what a lot of us do, individually and as families — agree on a softer version of events so nobody has to sit with the actual discomfort.
Someone gets sick, and the family decides not to talk about how serious it is. Someone we love dies, and we use language that keeps the finality at arm's length. We collectively decide certain things "didn't really happen" because acknowledging them costs too much.
The murder forces the sheep out of that system. They can't will themselves to forget this one, because that's not JUSTICE... Sebastian waking up the sheeps....A good friend should not be forgotten...For the first time, they have to actually reckon with death as something real, permanent, and frightening... instead of a story they tell themselves to feel safe.
That's the actual arc of the movie. Not "who killed George." It's" what happens to a community whose entire emotional survival strategy collapses at once, and they have to grow up fast.
The detective-novel framing the shepherd read them every night isn't incidental either — they're forced to use the *language and structure of fiction* to process something that's now devastatingly real. Which
is sort of what stories are for, honestly. We use them to practice feeling things before we have to feel them for real.
It's a kids' movie about sheep. It's also a quietly devastating film about denial, grief, and the exact moment a comfortable lie stops working.
Anyone else catch this on first watch, or did it hit you after?
Raakh Webseries: Unanswered Questions behind Chopra Murd€r Case 1978
Just finished Raakh this morning on Prime and went on a research about the real 1978 case has questions that were never properly answered...
The case on the surface is simple. Two teenagers on their way to All India Radio. Two criminals. Bodies found two days later. Both hanged in 1982.
But there are details that don't get discussed much:
The police noted the car's registration number wrong one letter off. HRK 8930 recorded as MRK 8930. The car could have been traced the same evening. It wasn't.
Both Ranga and Billa initially confessed to the r@p€ then retracted. The forensic evidence from 1978 couldn't confirm it either way. They were convicted on other charges. That particular question was never cleanly answered.
In October 1978 ... just weeks after the arrests...a Delhi tabloid gave an interview to India Today claiming the murders were masterminded by sons of a Union cabinet minister and an Army officer, both of whom had been rejected by Geeta. The Crime Branch raided the journalists' offices three times. The promised exposé was never published.
And then there's the fact that the Supreme Court itself noted the car doors had been pre-loosened so they couldn't be opened from inside. This wasn't opportunistic. They came prepared. For any two children... So there must be something more which was never revealed..even Raakh didn't explore this angle, rather it tried the same cliches : backstory of villains, why they become psychopaths, their atrocities on childhood etc.
Raakh Review
The Good things
The dual timeline structure is genuinely well-executed , the two tracks converging in Episode 4 is one of the better structural payoffs in recent thrillers after Patal lok.
Ali Fazal carries the entire investigation arc on restraint alone, no heroics, just a tired man doing the work.
Rajjo's backstory : the Emergency-era vasectomy, the village shame, the way humiliation travels downward ,is the most psychologically layered writing in the show.
The alternate ending is genuinely devastating , lovevthat ending where children singing...we are right here...
The 1970s Delhi texture feels lived-in , the production design doesn't announce itself.
The children fighting back is central, not incidental: love that angle of making victims brave and the show refuses to make Suman and Sahil passive.
What Could have Been Better
Pacing drags in Episodes 1 through 3
Sonali Bendre is given grief and almost nothing else, Mona Arora deserved a full character, not just a symbol of loss. I honestly expected more.
Rajjo's arc is built carefully for seven episodes and then resolved in about three minutes on a train.
There's a detail about how Ranga and Billa were actually caught that the show changes completely, and the real version is more interesting. Anyone know what actually happened? Also in the show, psychological portrait of each character and the layers, I explained all this in my blog detailed.. check that if you are interested in knowing more about the actual case and missing layers of Raakh.
https://akhilpillai.com/raakh-real-story-ranga-billa-case-explained/
Absolutely True! Drishyam & Manichithrathazhu
Alpha Meets La Femme Nikita
This French movie has already been adapted in Hindi as Kartoos starring Sanjay Dutt and Jackie Shroff ... So doubtful how Alpha will work on it
Drishyam 3 Doubts and Opinions
If Prabhakar had planned a framing at the resort, then why did they go to court to stop the wedding from happening?
After all, the first night would happen only if the wedding actually took place, right? 🤔
Another doubt, Sahadevan attacked the security staff that night at the resort. Isn’t that evidence that there was a third-party intruder that night?
Georgekutty gets a call from Sahadevan...while he is driving, he informs Jose to follow Sahadevan. But how does Jose even know where Sahadevan is heading to? How does even Georgekutty guess Sahadevan might be framing his daughter before je reached the resort 🙃
Then Georgekutty tells his brother-in-law to go home and gather people at night. After that, he reframes his daughter as a victim, the police take her to the hospital, and Georgekutty reaches Sahadevan’s house… My God! Isn’t it too hard to digest that all these events happened within just a few hours? I think Jeethu Joseph failed as a writer here, and the shift in Siddique’s character feels truly unbelievable.
I believe Drishyam 3 came out of Anthony chettan’s greed. Jeethu Joseph’s downfall has already started, and the team should stop this sequel game here.
Drishyam is a brilliant adaptation of The Devotion of Suspect X. Drishyam 2 is a decent extension with a good climax. But in Drishyam 3, the only good thing I found was Mohanlal. What an actor he is! He brilliantly portrayed Georgekutty 😍 the character’s mannerisms, the consistency he maintained even as the character evolved…
Drishyam 3 - a sequel that spoils the legacy
Athiradi Review: A Noonshow b!tch!ng
First half is basically Basil Joseph doing the same face 40 times while everyone around him laughs like it's the funniest thing ever. If I say that in a cringe Riya style: Okay we got it. He's the goofy underdog...Move on..
Then Tovino shows up looking cool and beating people up for no real reason and we're all supposed to clap. Okay fine. But where is the story??
The college fest plot sounds interesting on paper but they do absolutely nothing interesting with it. It's just an excuse to string together comedy scenes, fight scenes, and songs that nobody asked for (what really happened to Vishnu vijay - Ambili, Thallumala, Premalu)
Second half is a straight up punishment. Scenes that go nowhere. Dialogues that mean nothing. I checked my phone like many times, and many are doing the same who are seated in my raw..The guy next to me was literally playing some games.
And the climax?
Two good looking men stare at each other and then punch. That's it. That's the movie.
Chaman Chacko (editor) had ONE job. Trim the fat. He didn't 😭😭
Don't let the star cast fool you. Basil deserves better (waiting for something like P P AJEESH). Tovino deserves better (something like Manavalan). And we deserve better...
Rating: 1.5/5 book a recliner seat and enjoy