Posts:

CC Suarez gets an email from a grifty podcast ranking site and takes us all on a rollercoaster ride of emotions (January 8, 2026)

CC Suarez finally revealed which chart her "chart topping" podcast is #1 on. It's a janky site called goodpods, and they ranked Eliesabeth #1 in... Music History. (January 7, 2026)

CC is very sad to learn that Goodpods is a scam :( Says she didn’t want it on her website anyway!! (January 9, 2026)

It is with a heavy heart that I confirm that eLIESabeth is no longer ranked #1 on the monthly goodpods Music History chart :( (February 1 2026)

ps no one make fun of my editing skills ok i'm learning

both mid tier

38 = xiaoc factory ($423)

32 = yi factory ($292)

took about three weeks from start to delivery since there was a delay sourcing the 32 with SHW. my TS helped me find an alternate factory in my price range. i am not a stickler for high tier quality so that was fine with me - i love the bags and they are delightfully soft and slouchy!

i could fit my 13" macbook in the 32 but it won't really close properly, so i think if you're looking for a work bag the 38 is going to be the better option.

hope someone finds this useful!

not exactly the $4,000,000+ figure put forth by the podcast's (lack of) math but I do hope Jason sees justice.

yikes!

MFW i play the part of the ignorant white woman who accidentally did a teeny weeny bit of content theft from a black creator but really i didn't do that because it was my editors fault i mean my management company's fault and no i don't watch my videos back girl what and also i am too depressed to review my own content like do you expect me to watch my own two hour long slop and also i was at disney world all week (ps donate to my gofundme) and i needed to rush the video out to get the sponsorship money for the content i stole but girl it was fair use because i said some stuff at the start of the video and i only used over an hour of someone else's uninterrupted content back to back and profited off of it through monetization and sponsorships babe what are you even talking about?????

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSz16ngdsG0

(source)

accused of failing to discipline deputies for misusing databases? shocking!

>“As no factual investigation precedes the reviews, the commission’s conclusions do not reflect on the accuracy of the allegations made in these complaints,” the commission said in the news release, after meeting in closed-door session.

this comes after a slew of articles all year about misconduct within the HCSO and a number of ethics scandals.

source.

Love ya girl!

and if you're wet or sweaty enough that your makeup is smearing all over your face, it's best to reapply every 45 minutes.

don't forget that UV exposure is highly cumulative: the damage might not show up right away, but if you're spending money on skincare or skin treatments you might as well be throwing it down the drain if you aren't using proper sun protection!

they last removed a bunch of her subscribers 2 months ago for the same behavior and this subreddit has caught her purchasing subs multiple times at this point, always in increments of 1k

quite sad!

we know it ain't for voice acting!

[disclaimer: this past week Master Deputy Anthony Suarez described himself as a "public figure" and participated both on-camera and off camera in creating content for chelsea's channel. these images were taken from this news clip of the sheriff's department giving themselves an award they made for collecting cereal, which they say can help reduce violent crime in the area. naturally)

of course a cop would disregard the concept of people consenting to being on camera. the meta glasses are an ironic touch.

kelly was on screen for a longer amount of time than in this clip, but i think you get the point. chelsea seemed very annoyed that kelly didn't want to be on stream and mentioned it repeatedly. but tony filmed her anyway!

i know other attendees were livestreaming from their booths. while i still think that's questionable, at least people knew they were approaching a booth with a phone propped up and likely recording. it's MUCH weirder to walk around livestreaming other people without them knowing.

pps no one make fun of my terrible editing skills

edit: to be fair, a commenter informed me there were signs up before you entered the creator row saying there may be filming going on. however, it seems like chelsea had no idea that attendees de facto consented given her commentary in these clips.

first the story was that she went outside to grab the rug which been delivered and at that time had noticed that the packet had been "flopped on the porch." she "didn't even know it had been delivered" and she didn't sign for it.

now the story is that thought she was signing for her rug and didn't even notice that she was being served when she had signed for the packet. i guarantee you this "correction" wouldn't have been spoken of at all if this subreddit hadn't called her out on the lie! but, to give her some credit, maybe she really is that monumentally stupid as to think the clearly delivered package on the porch and the fedex person asking her to sign for it had nothing to do with one another. says a lot about her mindset that she would assume she hadn't been properly served rather than, uh, that the thing she signed for was the legal paperwork she was required to sign for.

she really is this subreddit's most loyal reader!

>"Yeah. I was served yesterday, kind of. Kind of....

>I feel like you can't just like flop, you know, flop it on the porch... like on someone's front porch. And that's what they did. Like, I didn't even know it was delivered.

>I went outside because... our new rug had been delivered. And then I looked down and I was like, what the fuck is that? ..

>...Even if it's just done by the, you know, US Marshals, the, like, stipulation there is that you have to, like, you can leave it at someone's dwelling, but you have to leave it with someone who is, like, over 18, I guess...

>Anyways, or you have to like leave it with that person who it's for, and that wasn't done. So then if I say like, hey, I was not properly served, then like then what?"

clipped from her May 1st, 2026 live.

court documents today show that she was properly served. the packet required a direct signature, and the court documents provide a copy of her signature.

why lie about this?

genuinely sickening

(hint: it is not anorexia or anything related to body image!)

some are kind of grubby and banged up from use!