Issues with major decision in Sector 2
Warning, post will have spoilers.
I am playing the game for the first time. I'm not the biggest Star Trek expert but I've watched my share over the decades from Voyager all the way back to DS9/TNG/TOS. First of all let me say, while many of the things in the game are familiar to me, I have forgotten plenty and I do NOT have any memory of how the in-game events here relate to the original episodes of Voyager.
I had some issues with the decision in Sector 2 where, following Tuvok's investigation, I [Janeway rather] am asked to make a decision about who the traitor is. I thought I did pretty well on the away team missions and I even demanded the blood sample from Seska, revealing she's not who she said she was. And all I learned from the away team mission was that she was gathering mushrooms when she claimed the Kazon attacked. In my opinion, all the evidence uncovered surrounding Carey and Seska is 'circumstantial', meaning I don't feel I had any information that conclusively proves either of them is responsible for the food-replicator technology leak incident. (Carey uncovers some circumstantial evidence on Seska, but he has expressed some degree of prejudices and refusal to trust Maquis in the past, which makes the motivations behind his accusations less reliable to me). And I did understand the line about how the 'evidence' against Carey could have been planted by the traitor. But does some of this not also apply to evidence against Seska? "Hey Kazon, she is in the cave alone, go after her and let her escape and later I will accuse her...."
I have some issues with how the game handles this next. First of all, I'm asked to make a conclusive declaration that one of them is the traitor who leaked the replicator technology - there is no option to say 'We arent sure, so we're removing both of you from duty for now'. Here I am thinking 'wait, I thought we have certain principles in the Federation... we have the prime directive but here we are branding someone a traitor without any real proof'.
First of all, that seems rather un-Federation-like to me, but whatever, it's a game and we have to move things along (lol). I also dislike though when games present you with a choice but you really don't have the means to make an informed decision(put a pin in this for next paragraph). But again, whatever, I can get past that.
Now what happens next will probably amuse everyone who remembers their episodes of Voyager. Remember, I do not even remember who Seska and Carey are in the show.... so, I concluded that Carey was blinded by his prejudices. That he was hoping -any- proof that Seska was a spy who did lie about -some- things would confuse everyone into assuming she's guilty of the technology leak. (She infiltrated the Maquis..... but I am supposed to think this is evil? That is what the Federation did using Tuvok! And, I assumed, the game/story is trying to throw me off by saying she is Cardassian, therefore she must be evil...) Also, this doesn't require that Carey leaked the technology, maybe he just wants Seska gone.
So (probably hilariously), I accuse Carey. And almost immediately Seska pulls her 'Haha I tricked you' gambit. Epic Fail for Captain Janeway, err, me, in this case.
So this has left me wondering - did I miss something in the game that would have told me more conclusively that she was the traitor? Is the game actually designed with the assumption that I remember from the story that Seska is 'supposed to' be the traitor? Is this not really the 'worst' decision that I made (because the game is certainly making me feel like it is)?
I plan on continuing with the game after deciding whether to re-do Sector 2, but feel free to spoil Sector 2 alternatives here, and also to make fun of me for what a moron I am.