Bhai kasam se delhi, patna me jo ho rha hai usko dekh k fomo ho rha hai? Yahan karwao, hamara shantipurn tarike se hoga kyuki ham jante hai jamshedpur ki police khali bike walo ko pakdati hai. Paidal chalne walo ko nhi.
My friend and I were debating whether adding cricket to the Olympics is ultimately a good or bad thing, especially from India’s perspective.
My view is that it’s a positive change. Cricket has an enormous fanbase, and I think a lot of people who normally wouldn’t watch the Olympics will tune in because of cricket. Once they’re already watching, some of them might end up discovering and following other sports like wrestling, badminton, shooting, athletics, hockey, etc. If Olympic viewership increases overall, it could also attract more sponsors and investment, which might benefit other sports in the long run.
My friend’s argument is the opposite. He thinks cricket will completely overshadow the other events in India. According to him, if India wins an Olympic gold in cricket, the public and media will mostly focus on that achievement and pay less attention to athletes who have spent years competing in less popular sports. He believes this could make it even harder for those athletes to get recognition, sponsorships, and support.
So I’m curious what others think.
My friend and I were debating whether adding cricket to the Olympics is ultimately a good or bad thing, especially from India’s perspective.
My view is that it’s a positive change. Cricket has an enormous fanbase, and I think a lot of people who normally wouldn’t watch the Olympics will tune in because of cricket. Once they’re already watching, some of them might end up discovering and following other sports like wrestling, badminton, shooting, athletics, hockey, etc. If Olympic viewership increases overall, it could also attract more sponsors and investment, which might benefit other sports in the long run.
My friend’s argument is the opposite. He thinks cricket will completely overshadow the other events in India. According to him, if India wins an Olympic gold in cricket, the public and media will mostly focus on that achievement and pay less attention to athletes who have spent years competing in less popular sports. He believes this could make it even harder for those athletes to get recognition, sponsorships, and support.
So I’m curious what others think.
My friend and I were debating whether adding cricket to the Olympics is ultimately a good or bad thing, especially from India’s perspective.
My view is that it’s a positive change. Cricket has an enormous fanbase, and I think a lot of people who normally wouldn’t watch the Olympics will tune in because of cricket. Once they’re already watching, some of them might end up discovering and following other sports like wrestling, badminton, shooting, athletics, hockey, etc. If Olympic viewership increases overall, it could also attract more sponsors and investment, which might benefit other sports in the long run.
My friend’s argument is the opposite. He thinks cricket will completely overshadow the other events in India. According to him, if India wins an Olympic gold in cricket, the public and media will mostly focus on that achievement and pay less attention to athletes who have spent years competing in less popular sports. He believes this could make it even harder for those athletes to get recognition, sponsorships, and support.
So I’m curious what others think.