u/loLRH

hello i am a beginner writer learning to write more precise prose with objective projection i have take this paragraph, very famous , and am trying to write it better with narrative engineering.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way…”

my version with narrative engineering

it was a time of financial opportunity but not for a lot of people, it was a time of very high IQ but people were performing foolish actions, it was summer (96F), it was winter (32F), people were chemically affected by seasonal depression because of the lack of vitamin D, we had food water and shelter and we were looking at metaphysical systems of morality where we would be rewarded or punished (hypothetically).

what do u think, which one is better? thank u Mr Bulut, i think my writing is better bc i heard of narrative engineering from this sub

Hi people

HERE IN THE SHADY GROVE IN THE CENTER OF THE PARK!

The Astoria Philosophy Thing, where we talk about stuff, is TODAY, May 16th, 5pm at Socrates Sculpture Park.

follow @astoriaphilosophything on IG for more info!

“Show, Don't Tell" is a myth. Here is how "The Adjective Embargo" actually engineers a scene.

Most writers think they are "showing" when they use better adjectives. They are wrong. Adjectives are abstract labels; they don't trigger the brain's physical sensors.

Let's look at a "Sadness" scene through the lens of **Objective Projection**.

**1. The "Show, Don't Tell" Version (Traditional):**

"He felt a crushing loneliness as he looked at the empty bed. The room felt cold and desolate. He was heartbroken, knowing she was never coming back. He let out a heavy sigh, his eyes filling with tears."

**Critique:** This is a failure. "Crushing loneliness," "desolate," "heartbroken"—these are all emotional labels. The reader's brain just checks the "Sadness" box and moves on. No biological impact.

**2. The Objective Projection Version (Narrative Engineering):**

"The digital clock on the bedside table flickered: 03:14 AM. The blue light hit the empty half of the mattress. He placed his hand on the sheet where she used to sleep. The fabric was exactly 21°C—the ambient temperature of the room. There was no residual body heat. He withdrew his hand, his fingernails scratching against the cotton. In the silence, the sound of the refrigerator humming in the kitchen measured 35 decibels."

**Why this works:**

• **Zero Adjectives:** No "sad," "lonely," or "cold."

• **Physical Parameters:** We use temperature (21°C), light (03:14 AM blue light), and sound (35 dB).

• **The Result:** The brain calculates the "coldness" and "absence" of the person through physics. You don't read sadness; you **experience** the physical void.

We are building an SFT Dataset on Hugging Face to train AI to stop using labels and start using these **Biophysical Parameters**.

What do you think? Which version made you "feel" the absence more?

\#NarrativeEngineering #ObjectiveProjection #WritingTips #SFT #HuggingFace #Neuroaesthetics