u/mahatmatom

Issues with XF100-400: lens or user error?

Issues with XF100-400: lens or user error?

Hi everyone! I turn to my fellow Fujifilm users to understand my problems with the 100-400.

These two images are a perfect embodiment of my frustrations with this lens: https://imgur.com/a/proposal-blur-CNNRZDu (didn't attach them to the post in case the clients happens to come to this thread eheh)

Both images were taken at F / 5.6, ISO 160, 400mm, one at 1/850 and one at 1/950. I was in Aperture priority. I don't recall the focus setting but I think AF-C. Taken on an X-H2s. I kept the ISO low because it was really bright and I felt like the 1/850-950 ss would be enough, and hoped the low ISO would have enhanced the sharpness.

This was a surprise proposal. It all happened very fast, clients were 15 minutes early, she kept looking behind herself so I was trying to hide on the side of the road. I did have the AF set at 5meters to infinity, so it should not be the bush in front of me bothering me. Maybe I was shaking a little more than normal, but I get those images even when I am not shaking. I hardly ever get a sharp shot out of that lens. I

These are my hypotheses:

  1. Lens softness. I know you're supposed to stop down to F / 8, but is it THAT soft wide open?

  2. It's my shaking and I should give up on shooting at the long end of the 100-400 unless I have at least a monopod. I did have both IBIS and OIS on. But if you look at his shoes, for instance, that seems sharp enough... I mean, you can see the ridges and the details that you don't see on their faces...

  3. It's not so much an issue of softness but AF. AF is not locking where the subject IS.

Any help is appreciated. If it's a lens issue, I'm open to move to the 70-300 or the 150-600. I don't do much birding and wildlife, but I use the long zoom in this kind of job, or at events where I have to stay all the way in the back...

u/mahatmatom — 3 days ago
▲ 30 r/Columbo

For a cigar smoker, A TRACE OF MURDER was torture :D

Just came here to say that ahah

Yesterday we watched traces of murder and it was such a torture. I don't smoke at home, so watching the whole plot revolving around good cigars, Columbo's stogies, Clifford's cuban stash, the wedge cigar clipper...

It was hard!

reddit.com
u/mahatmatom — 4 days ago

Just a psa: don't sleep on it. A few months ago I got myself a Peavey Cropper Classic on Reverb. Blind (or rather deaf) buy, first time buying a guitar without trying it first.
At first I was a little taken aback by the lack of twang. But within a week it became one of my favorite guitars. The range of tones you can get out of it is fantastic. It almost feels as if a Fender and a Gibson had a baby.

reddit.com
u/mahatmatom — 16 days ago
▲ 3 r/BikeLA

Hi y'all! As per the title, I'm torn on the bike that's best for weekend leisure rides around LA - sometimes with my wife who's a trail runner.

For years my sole ride was a Specialized Sirrus X 4.0, I went countless times to Westridge, Sycamore Canyon, did a couple of times Josephine Peak, and Crystal Cove in the OC. When I bought it, it was sold as a gravel bike, then it was switched to "fitness bike" as more aggressive gravel bikes were introduced.

Last year I got a beautiful Santa Cruz Chameleon, and rode it quite a bit since. I like it a lot, but I don't love it. First, I confess I am a scaredy cat and I had a few meh experiences with the Santa Cruz: ticks on an overgrown single trail, quite a few falls going downhill (very slow).. and I am not thrilled about the riding position. The wide handlebar drives my hands numb after a bit, and after long rides my knees hurt in ways that long rides on the Sirrus never made. Also my butt hurts more, because I guess that the geometry of the hardtail shares less weight on the arms and more on the butt?

The last minor annoyance is that, when we travel, I cannot pack my Santa Cruz and my wife's road bike together on the hatch rack.

In general, I have a feeling that for my skills, my desire to get better, and my lack of courage (I am REALLY scared of breaking some bones as I turn 40 next year) the Santa Cruz is an overkill.

Do you think that I could tackle the same kinda trails with a gravel bike instead of a mtb? I've seen tons of gravel bikes on Josephine and of course Westridge/Mullholland but their riders were WAY fitter than me. Or I could try and make the MTB a little tamer, for instance by switching to a slightly narrower handler bar, and eventually also getting some slightly narrower tires to make it a little speedier on flats?

Conversely, what I do appreciate of the Santa Cruz is the fork... whenever I drive it around LA I can totally ignore the bumps and potholes, which is no little feat...

Any advice is welcome!

reddit.com
u/mahatmatom — 19 days ago