IOS-XE 26.1.2
Release notes says no caveats were fixed.
Is that all?
Binary image is larger than 26.1.1.
What is purpose of this version then?
Release notes says no caveats were fixed.
Is that all?
Binary image is larger than 26.1.1.
What is purpose of this version then?
Standalone computer (not joined in AD) with Windows 11 25H2 with latest updates.
USB disk which Windows identifies as fixed disk.
GP setting which enables Bitlocker PIN (only) for system disk as 2FA.
Other Bitlocker GP settings are in Not Configured state.
Using Turn Bitlocker On on non system disk ends up with error about not compatible GP settings.
Is there a workaround?
There is a confirmed bug since June 2026 but affected version is 16.6.x.
I have 26.01.01 and ACE with network object group (consist of two hosts) is not permitting traffic. Replacing it with respective IPs permits traffic as expected.
Since I am middle of migration from old platform to C9500 and using plenty of object groups to simplify things, this possible bug makes huge obstacle for me.
Anyone using object groups in latest IOS-XE versions without problems?
Týka sa to aj vášho regiónu?
Ak áno, uvedomili sa niektorí spoluobčania a neplytvajú vodou?
Mne vypadlo tesnenie z dverí na aute.
From trusted shop we obtained SFP+ modules described as Cisco compatible.
Compatible SFP-10G-T-X identifies as SFP+ 10GBASE-SR (sh inventory or sh int transceiver).
Compatible SFP-10G-BXD/U-I identifies as SFP+ 10GBASE-LR.
Is this going to be a problem?
I cannot google how Cisco original 10G copper modules identify themselves.
I googled single strand modules identify themselves with BX string in description.
Cisco original copper 1G SFP identifies itself with TX string in description.
This hasn't prevented Ubuntu from upgrading kernel:
# apt-mark showhold
linux-generic
linux-headers-generic
linux-image-generic
-------------------------------------------------
# cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS"
-------------------------------------------------
# uname -r
6.17.0-14-generic
I am getting "Prerequisite check failed" with "Required version of Microsoft .NET Framework".
This is single server SCCM system with .NET framework 3.5 and 4.8 installed.
SCCM is 2509 with hotfixes KB36495448 and KB36419072.
.NET Framework version confirmed via PowerShell mentioned here: https://www.prajwaldesai.com/fix-sccm-dot-net-prerequisite-check-warning/
Is that so? Or it all handles their firmware?
I read somewhere CCTV storage must support purple WD disks in order to fully utilize their advantages.
So I suspect mainstream RAID cards do not utilize their potential.
Some enterprise CCTV appliances use server disks not purple ones.
Replacing C6500 with C9500 in two months and thinking whether upgrading to 26.1 now, will save us from future upgrade problems when 17.18 became EOS.
Our infrastracture will be C9300(L) or C9200L. Now majority is C3750E(G) and slowly replacing to 9300.
What mature options are available for automatic replacement of certificates on Fortigates?
These certificates are used in SSL inspection security profiles (so this not certificate for Fortigate itself).
We use two public CAs for our certs and also wildcard certificates. Both support ACME.
Anybody using https://github.com/nikriaz/FortiCertSync ?
Tak (komunálne) voľby sa nám blížia a vyrojilo sa nám tu plno kandidátov, pri niektorých mám WTF pocit.
Ako by ste zmenili volebný systém, aby bol na prospech spoločnosti?
Napríklad povinnosť prejsť nejakými vstupnými testami (všeobecný rozhľad, verejná správa), mať vyzbieraný určitý počet podpisov od občanov, ...