u/mylfy_suxballz

Hi! I'm currently a 2nd-year CSE student at MAHE Bengaluru. If you have any questions about academics, hostels, campus life, clubs, placements, or anything else related to the college, feel free to ask here. I'll answer based on my experience.

I personally had a lot of questions before joining this college, but unfortunately I didn't have many people who could help me. If you're in the same situation, feel free to ask your questions here. I'd be glad to help based on my experience.

In my opinion, we shouldn't right?

I think a lot of people are judging fiction as if it's meant to be a moral handbook. Stories have always explored flawed characters, questionable decisions, and uncomfortable situations that doesn't automatically mean the film is endorsing those actions.

Depiction and endorsement are two completely different things. If we start expecting every fictional work to meet our personal moral standards, then a huge portion of cinema and literature would become unacceptable.

It's perfectly reasonable to criticize execution or messaging, but reducing every piece of fiction to "this is morally wrong, therefore it shouldn't exist or be watched" ignores the purpose of storytelling. Audiences are capable of distinguishing between what is acceptable in real life and what exists within a fictional narrative

In my opinion, we shouldn't right?

I think a lot of people are judging fiction as if it's meant to be a moral handbook. Stories have always explored flawed characters, questionable decisions, and uncomfortable situations that doesn't automatically mean the film is endorsing those actions.

Depiction and endorsement are two completely different things. If we start expecting every fictional work to meet our personal moral standards, then a huge portion of cinema and literature would become unacceptable.

It's perfectly reasonable to criticize execution or messaging, but reducing every piece of fiction to "this is morally wrong, therefore it shouldn't exist or be watched" ignores the purpose of storytelling. Audiences are capable of distinguishing between what is acceptable in real life and what exists within a fictional narrative

I wonder how no one raised this question

“Non-consesual touch glorified as romance” and shows “a gentleman who respects everyone despite their stature as comedian”

If you watch it separately;

A guy try to kiss an unknown girl in bus trying to make pictures of that kissing; and then jumps out of bus breaking window when about to be caught.

Now; you glorify as he is such a good guy. Thats basically the movie; not to add if the guy doesnt look as attractive as VD its completely different story altogether

Isn't this much worse than peddi? if you look at it, peddi was an uneducated rural guy who doesnt know how to love somone without physical touch ( not justifying what he did- what he did was wrong) but vijay? he was educated and a TEACHER.

Both of them kissed by mistake but geeta govindam completely romanticized it right? this movie is celebrated among VD fans.

How did vijay approve that scene? what did the director think while filming this, such a pervert kada, why didnt he apologise in twitter?

Always wonder How come an assault case became a love story and family entertainer.

I wonder how no one raised this question

“Non-consesual touch glorified as romance” and shows “a gentleman who respects everyone despite their stature as comedian”

If you watch it separately;

A guy try to kiss an unknown girl in bus trying to make pictures of that kissing; and then jumps out of bus breaking window when about to be caught.

Now; you glorify as he is such a good guy. Thats basically the movie; not to add if the guy doesnt look as attractive as VD its completely different story altogether

Isn't this much worse than peddi? if you look at it, peddi was an uneducated rural guy who doesnt know how to love somone without physical touch ( not justifying what he did- what he did was wrong) but vijay? he was educated and a TEACHER.

Both of them kissed by mistake but geeta govindam completely romanticized it right? this movie is celebrated among VD fans.

How did vijay approve that scene? what did the director think while filming this, such a pervert kada, why didnt he apologise in twitter?

Always wonder How come an assault case became a love story and family entertainer.

https://preview.redd.it/he0z20x4a76h1.jpg?width=225&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7384d077a809c3afbb05813b5bec5ea800dd2808

I wonder how no one raised this question

“Non-consesual touch glorified as romance” and shows “a gentleman who respects everyone despite their stature as comedian”

If you watch it separately;

A guy try to kiss an unknown girl in bus trying to make pictures of that kissing; and then jumps out of bus breaking window when about to be caught.

Now; you glorify as he is such a good guy. Thats basically the movie; not to add if the guy doesnt look as attractive as VD its completely different story altogether

Isn't this much worse than peddi? if you look at it, peddi was an uneducated rural guy who doesnt know how to love somone without physical touch ( not justifying what he did- what he did was wrong) but vijay? he was educated and a TEACHER.

Both of them kissed by mistake but geeta govindam completely romanticized it right? this movie is celebrated among VD fans.

How did vijay approve that scene? what did the director think while filming this, such a pervert kada, why didnt he apologise in twitter?

Always wonder How come an assault case became a love story and family entertainer.

https://preview.redd.it/qqy513m7pi4h1.jpg?width=3866&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=43ff65280a4cc6c983e189ed5e93202a919b3cdc

well as an srh fan, i was ofcourse not supporting rcb as their fans were very toxic towords srh players but as a team RCB has dominated this ipl entirely, in the stadium where GT dominated the most, they contained them to a very minimal score and chased it smoothly ofc due to good innings by virat and my goat BHUVI! ah man i miss him

Honestly they had very balanced team, someone to ensure when collapse occurs and very good bowling department. Very good season for them.

Hope we will have a balanced team next year and win!

Well ofcourse we know he is past his prime and the 2 matches he played for us didnt turn out great but what do you think will happen if he comes in playing 11? will he make an impact? ive seen him play good for rcb a bit

how can we carelessly play this bad? after a wicket is down we shouldve slowed down but nah prati shot six povali anthe ela? i appriciate the innings played by pat but why the need to rush, singles tesukoni edho 100+ cheste em ayidhi?

i had this question for a long time and wanted to ask, of couse there is personality too. I feel good looks/personality wont guarentee a partner if you are not an extrovert/ talking skills, i would like to know what you guys would advice somone who cant approach even with good looks. I am in a similar situation right now and am having a lot of fomo by looking at my classmates having partner just after talking for a while, is it that easy?

i had this quuestion for a long time and wanted to ask, of couse there is personality too but honestly i dont see it sometimes. Would like to have an opinion