![[SPOILERS] Why I believe the death of Soap was better than the original.](https://preview.redd.it/k3q1dtmkbwjh1.jpeg?auto=webp&s=addc9fe4352ad8449b51feaac7909c6fab86e40a)
[SPOILERS] Why I believe the death of Soap was better than the original.
The MWIII campaign was short but it had its moments, but the big deal here is obviously soaps death coming out of nowhere and seemed as “bad writing”.
During the mission of his death we’re basically defusing bombs in an underground subway tunnel, everybody is high on adrenaline besides makarov who obviously knows what he’s doing showing up out of nowhere and attacking us.
As we’re defusing Makarov appears out of nowhere almost like a jumpscare and instantly shoots soap and puts price on the floor, it was fast and they didn’t have time to react as they were tryin to defuse a bomb. Soap obviously didn’t die right away, adrenaline probably kicked in and he runs and stabs him where then Makarov also riddled with adrenaline from being stabbed shoot him in the head, all of this in the matter of seconds.
The reason I prefer this death over the original is because in a real battlefield things won’t be as dramatic as getting blown out of a building and getting impaled, rather a realistic scenario if we’re trying to stop a terror attack and shit went down. In real life Soap’s death might have went the same, in just a few seconds he was gone just like real soldiers fighting in wars.