For me , it could mean that they start losing each in every state cent election from now on and more resignations happen in other states as well as people don’t back out and ask for resignation of Finance minister, home minister, petroleum minister, and Transport minister
Will bjp complete its term till 2029, or will the public and eventually mps in lok sabha start withdrawing their support and pressure them to resign.
Bjp clearly doesn’t have a clue on what to do now, instead of accepting their mistake they are trying to shut everyone down, which is obviously not going to work for long
Will bjp complete its term till 2029, or will the public and eventually mps in lok sabha start withdrawing their support and pressure them to resign.
Bjp clearly doesn’t have a clue on what to do now, instead of accepting their mistake they are trying to shut everyone down, which is obviously not going to work for long
Will bjp complete its term till 2029, or will the public and eventually mps in lok sabha start withdrawing their support and pressure them to resign.
Bjp clearly doesn’t have a clue on what to do now, instead of accepting their mistake they are trying to shut everyone down, which is obviously not going to work for long
Have you seen Mukesh Ambani family specially his kids and wife along with of course Mukesh ambani, they don’t look like billionaires they don’t act like billionaires, Atmos they look like some rich gujju family who struck gold but don’t know shit about Health, personality, etiquette in their Peace mental health, etc., they just want to buy every stuff in the world, eat everything in the world . Is this because the money they earn is because of help from government and donations/corruption
I have 256 gb ip16 and additional 200 odd gb of icloud storage and have total of 350 gb photos and videos
When i backed up photos and videos on one drive in phone , it didnt backup every photo and vid,
I basically want to backup and empty my phone memory.
I did some research and found out that some photos and videos are on iCloud. OneDrive skips those.
How can i make sure everything on my phone / icloud is on my onedrive
I have type c sandisk 1 tb usb aswell of that can helpe
I can see everyone criticizing, Prime Minister and Home minister and here and there people also openly criticize Gautam Adani, but never have I seen anyone openly criticizing Mukesh Ambani I believe that he has more role in Indian politics than Even Gautam Adani, but I am fascinated by the fact that his PR is so tight that no one even thinks about him what could be the case and what are your thoughts? Is it just my theory or is there some substance to it?
I can see everyone criticizing, Prime Minister and Home minister and here and there people also openly criticize Gautam Adani, but never have I seen anyone openly criticizing Mukesh Ambani I believe that he has more role in Indian politics than Even Gautam Adani, but I am fascinated by the fact that his PR is so tight that no one even thinks about him what could be the case and what are your thoughts? Is it just my theory or is there some substance to it?
First of all, I will not be replying to any hateful comments because every other comments, I know will ask why don’t you take them home, this is an open discussion and every comment is Welcome
What genuinely shocks me is how some people can hate the mere presence of street dogs and other animals in their society. When did empathy become a weakness?
The real failure is years of corruption and poor implementation of taxpayer-funded sterilization and vaccination programs. Instead of demanding accountability, people target the few who spend their own money helping helpless animals.
The Earth doesn’t belong only to humans. We built on land that wildlife once called home, then act as if every other living being has no right to exist. If kindness bothers you more than corruption, perhaps the problem isn’t the animals—it’s what we’ve become as a society.
Finally booked a house in mumbai at 40 years age , wanted to live on rent whole life but these society ppl have become more and more unbearable and problematic towards tenants and we are huge street dog lovers/ pet lovers . 3.5 cr ka fatka lag gaya
Finally booked a house in mumbai at 40 years age , wanted to live on rent whole life but these society ppl have become more and more unbearable and problematic towards tenants and we are huge street dog lovers/ pet lovers . 3.5 cr ka fatka lag gaya
Are we cooked brothers and sisters.???
First, I hear organizations are in race to use AI to build Software’s at fastest rates tokens getting over so and so forth
I also see that Ozempic and GLP one is being pushed down the throat of people with promise of no blood sugar no blood pressure no need to go to the gym and no need to follow, we are not far from the future, where our children are being shoved Ozempic right from the birth because of the resistance
And of course modi ji will sell all india to ambani and adani and run away , the very day his bubble gets busted
Recently, I met someone who had spoken with a new employee who had just left a software company that had heavily embraced AI. What he described was not a future prediction. It was something already happening inside real businesses.
The company’s traditional workflow was straightforward. Human developers built software using Python and other programming languages. Product teams gathered client requirements and worked with developers to make changes and improvements. It was the model that has powered the software industry for decades.
Then management got access to Claude Workspace.
Initially, AI was used as a productivity tool. Developers used it to fix bugs, write code faster, and automate repetitive tasks.
Then something changed.
Management discovered that product managers, people with little or no software engineering expertise, could describe a product to Claude and receive a functioning application in hours instead of months.
The results looked remarkable.
Modern interfaces.
Working features.
Happy clients.
Management reached a conclusion many companies are now reaching:
“If AI can build software, why do we need so many developers?”
Many developers were laid off.
Others chose to leave.
This is where the story becomes fascinating.
Most executives evaluate software based on what they can see.
The interface.
The reports.
The buttons.
The features.
Developers evaluate software differently.
They look at the foundation.
The architecture.
The database design.
The security.
The scalability.
The maintainability.
In traditional software development, the foundation comes first. Features are built on top of that foundation.
According to the employee, AI often approached the problem differently.
Instead of creating a strong core and then building features around it, it frequently generated large volumes of code designed to satisfy immediate feature requests.
Something that might require 100 lines of carefully engineered code could become 1,000 lines.
A feature that should have been integrated into the architecture might instead be layered on top of previous layers.
The software worked.
Until it didn’t.
And when problems appeared, developers found themselves staring at enormous AI generated codebases that were difficult to understand, difficult to maintain, and increasingly difficult to repair.
Management had a simple answer.
“Just ask the AI to fix it.”
But every fix introduced the possibility of more code.
More layers.
More complexity.
More dependencies.
The software continued functioning, but beneath the surface technical debt accumulated at an accelerating rate.
The company became increasingly dependent on the AI system that had created the software.
At some point, the subscription was no longer a tool.
It became a necessity.
The AI was no longer assisting developers.
It was becoming the primary builder, debugger, maintainer, and architect.
This may be the beginning of what I call Phase Two of the AI era.
Phase One was AI helping humans.
Phase Two is humans gradually surrendering ownership of systems while AI becomes the only practical way to maintain them.
The irony is that the greatest risk may not be AI replacing developers.
The greatest risk may be organizations replacing understanding with convenience.
History is full of examples where efficiency arrived faster than wisdom.
The software industry may be experiencing exactly that moment.
Because if companies continue removing the engineers who understand how systems work beneath the surface, they may eventually discover that AI has not replaced expertise.
It has simply hidden the need for it.
And one day, when something critical breaks, there may not be enough people left who understand what the AI actually built.
I genuinely want to understand whether what we are witnessing today is incompetence, arrogance, political overconfidence, systemic corruption, corporate capture, or simply the reality of how power eventually functions in every democracy.
Take the fuel price issue for example. The finance minister says the government has “absorbed” the burden of rising oil prices to protect citizens. But economically speaking, what does that actually mean? Governments do not generate personal wealth. The money being used to cushion prices is still taxpayer money, borrowed money, or redistributed public money. It is not coming from politicians’ personal salaries or party funds. So why present it as though the government is doing citizens a favor out of generosity?
Is this just political messaging because they assume most people either will not understand the economics or simply will not care?
And that leads to another uncomfortable question. Has the ruling establishment reached a point where it no longer feels accountable to educated or questioning citizens because it believes its core voter base will remain loyal regardless of inflation, unemployment, rising taxes, fuel costs, institutional decline, or contradictions in policy?
At times it feels less like governance and more like perception management.
Another possibility is that repeated electoral victories create a sense of invincibility. When a government keeps winning despite criticism, does it slowly stop listening altogether? Does public outrage eventually become background noise to people in power?
Then there is the corporate angle which many people hesitate to discuss openly. Modern elections require enormous amounts of money. Political campaigns, media influence, digital outreach, rallies, advertising, and election machinery all depend heavily on funding. So has politics become deeply dependent on billionaire backed financing to the point where governments are no longer truly independent decision makers?
Are large industrialists and political parties now so interconnected that governments are forced to prioritize the interests of major business groups over ordinary taxpayers because losing that support would weaken their future electoral power?
And if that is true, then are politicians even fully in control anymore, or are they operating within a system where power, funding, corporations, media, and politics are all tied together?
What worries me even more is the growing sense that accountability itself is disappearing.
Major incidents happen back to back. Allegations emerge. Public anger rises. Debates happen across television and social media. Yet resignations rarely happen. Serious political consequences rarely happen. Ministers continue normally as though nothing significant occurred.
Even institutions that are expected to remain independent and act as checks and balances often appear silent, delayed, cautious, or ineffective while the ruling establishment moves ahead confidently.
At some point people begin asking whether institutions are becoming weaker in front of concentrated political power.
And what happens to a democracy when citizens slowly stop expecting accountability altogether?
Because that may be the most dangerous stage of all. Not when corruption exists, not when governments make mistakes, but when the public starts believing that no matter what happens, nobody powerful will ever truly be held responsible.
So what exactly are we looking at today?
A government that is incompetent?
A government that is arrogant because repeated victories have convinced it that criticism does not matter?
A political system designed around narrative management rather than governance?
A structure captured by corporate influence and election funding?
Or simply a democracy where power has become so centralized that institutions, opposition, media, and public outrage no longer create meaningful pressure?
I genuinely want to hear different perspectives because from the outside it increasingly feels like accountability survives more as an idea than as a functioning reality.