
Revisiting the Jonah Heim plate blocking Call
The broadcast just brought up the Heim call again so I dug it up and tried to understand it. There's a good video and rules analysis given here. To take something that's overly complicated though, and reduce it to simple ideas, I would frame it like this:
The rules are worded in a way to favor the runner, such that they can run full speed all the way to the plate. The only thing you're allowed to do to impede the runner requires you to be in possession of the baseball (or be in the act of fielding the ball). Once you have the ball you can freely slow down the runner pretty much however you want.
In the play in question, the runner was forced to veer off their full-speed path, to dodge Heim who was crossing over the base-path to field the ball. Since Heim was deemed to not be in possession of the ball (or needing to be where he was to field the ball), he was in violation.
I think it's a little unforgiving but I want to live in a world where baserunners get to run fast and the rules make injuries less likely. I'm not sure if the Heim situation was a proper application of the rules or not, and I kind of hate that there is a very gray area surrounding the act of fielding the ball where you can also block the plate even if you don't have the ball yet. It feels defense favored and creates more injuries than needed.