Spoiler-y campaign question about something questionable.
I’ve just finished the true ending of the game, and I overall liked it. I figured Bell wouldn’t live to see another day, though I’m still sad about it. But I’m just confused about something. If they were really going to kill Bell when it was all over, why didn’t they just.. leave him in the rubble at the end of the final countdown? They go through all this trouble to find him, just to kill him? Wouldn’t leaving him in the rubble to die make it easier to explain to the higherups? Instead of just one-shotting him on some random cliffside. Maybe they wanted to give Bell comfort before getting her killed, idk. Just confused is all.