Could GEO make digital PR more important than traditional SEO?
If AI systems rely heavily on third-party mentions and trusted platforms, PR/community visibility might become a huge ranking factor.
If AI systems rely heavily on third-party mentions and trusted platforms, PR/community visibility might become a huge ranking factor.
Reddit threads usually contain mixed opinions, arguments, pros/cons, unlike polished blog content.
Feels like once a brand becomes the default answer in AI systems, it keeps getting reinforced over and over.
Everyone talks about publishing more, but I’m curious if pruning thin/outdated pages helps LLM visibility the same way it sometimes helps SEO.
You can almost instantly tell when a page was written entirely by AI now. Ironically, those pages usually feel less useful than simpler human-written posts with real opinions, examples, or experience behind them.
A lot of AI-written articles look polished at first, but after reading a few paragraphs everything starts sounding repetitive and generic. Feels like the internet is slowly filling up with content that says a lot without actually saying much.
Curious if others are noticing the same thing or if I’m just spending too much time reading SEO content lately?
Traditional SEO metrics feel incomplete now. Are you tracking AI citations, prompt visibility, AI Overview appearances, or something else?
I’m noticing sites with detailed author entities, bios, and expertise signals appear more often in AI-generated responses. Coincidence or real trend?
I’ve seen messy pages get picked just because they answer clearly. Are we over-optimizing?
Smaller, focused sites seem to win in specific queries. Pattern or coincidence?
I’ve seen messy pages get picked over well-optimized ones. Is clean SEO structure becoming less important?