



A boy and a girl died in a dynamite explosion between the years 1921-1951. Who were the Los Angeles County Does?
The images attached are the girl’s reconstructions. I originally attached the photo of the boy’s legs, but it didn’t post for some reason, though the photo can be found on his unidentified wiki page, it isn’t graphic.
Between the years 1921 and 1951, in Los Angeles County, California, a boy and a girl died from a dynamite explosion.
The case and case photos were found in homicide detective Jack Huddleston’s scrapbook, and the full postmortem photos can be found in the book: ‘Death Scenes, A Homicide Detectives Scrapbook’, by Katherine Dunn and Sean Tejaratchi, on pages 58 and 59. The detective worked between 1921 and 1951, which is how they got the estimate for the year of death. The photos of the boy and girl were not dated. The review of the book Death Scenes refers to the deceased as “a young lover couple”, though this is likely just speculation.
Supposedly, the two of them were seen playing by, or in, a dam, and one of them (thought to be the boy because of the injuries he sustained) picked up a stick of dynamite, or was playing with a stick of dynamite. The dynamite exploded in their hands, and killed them instantly. While the date of death is unknown, the police were called instantly and the post mortem interval was minutes.
Websleuths user ‘MelmothTheLost’ gave a list of dams built in Los Angeles between the years 1921-1951:
Mulholland Dam (1923-1924)
Rindge Dam (1924-1926)
St Francis Dam (1924-1926) (Failed in 1928, Demolished in 1929)
Santa Anita Dam (1924-1927)
Little Rock Dam (1924, renovated in 1932, nearly failed in 1938; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little\_Rock\_Dam)
Bouquet Canyon Dam (1934)
Hansen Dam (1939-1940) (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Santa Fe Dam (1941-1949) (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Sepulveda Dam (1941-1949) (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Dynamite was used to build dams. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Dams_in_Los_Angeles_County,_California)
The Boy
The boy was estimated to have been between 4-17 years old (a very large gap but it’s what each source i could find for him says), he was wearing dark-coloured loafers; dark socks; medium-toned pants and possibly a dark-coloured, long-sleeved shirt. His height, weight, eye colour, hair colour and any distinguishing features he may have had, are all unknown.
His body was in such bad condition that the most recognisable part of him were his legs and feet, his upper body and head were destroyed, and because of this they were not able to create a facial reconstruction, however, according to a Websleuths user, ‘whorton’, who owns a copy of the book, said: “The boy has nothing but pulp left where his head was. His feet and legs are intact. The male is laying on the ground with a few plants and lots of dirt clods. He appears to be wearing dress pants, a sport jacket and both of his shoes are on his feet; his shoes appear to be ankle high (it’s hard to tell from the angle of the photo), and the tips are curved and pointed, though this feature could just be the result of a stretch/warp in the photo. He is laying on his back and we are viewing it from the head downward towards his feet. The only damage seems to be extensive fragmentation to his head, making it unrecognisable. His right arm is draped over his body and his hand is missing or mangled. It is difficult to discern if there is blood near his head, or just shadows. The photo was well lit and appears to have been taken in the early afternoon.”, though another Websleuths user, ‘ladyballplayer’, said: “His head looks like it was smashed not "blown off". There's no brain matter in the vicinity. That photo doesn't look like the damage was caused by something exploding in his hands at all. I can't wrap my head around how these injuries could have happened at the same time. Was she holding the stick with her hands and feet next to his head while he was lying on the ground?”
The Girl
The girl was estimated to have been between 13-19 years old, she was wearing a light-coloured, long-sleeved top, a dark-coloured skirt or pants, and dark-coloured socks with stripes at the top.
Websleuths user ‘whorton’, who owns the book and has seen the photos, described the girl’s injuries in the photo as: “The female appears to be laying on sand with no plants visible. (appears to be a beach almost.) She is also laying on her back with her face clearly visible and in remarkable condition. Left side facing us. Her left foot appears mangled, but right leg is missing mid tib fib region. Clothing is pretty extensively ravaged and she may have avulsed intestines. Her face is largely intact however there is damage to the right side of her face.”
Alternatives / Theories / Suggestions
The Idea That The Two Were Originally Identified
Something that has been speculated about a lot with this case is that the two could’ve been identified when the incident happened, but due to the bad record keeping their identification went missed later on, or just wasn’t documented.
Were The Photos Really Of The Incident?
Some users on Websleuths speculated that, because the two photos weren’t just one photo (the photo of the boy and the photo of the girl were on two different pages, with the pages being next to eachother) and that the injuries (though whether you believe the injuries align with an explosion or not is your opinion) didn’t align with an explosion, that the photos may have been of separate incidents, and that Huddleston may have been misremembering the background of the two photos, and falsely believing the photos belonged to another case. This could also be why there isn’t a newspaper available about a dynamite explosion involving two young adults/teens/children.
Huddleston also did have photos from different States, and it has also been considered that the photos were from the dynamite case Huddleston thought they were from, but that they didn’t occur in California like he thought they did.
Ending Note: I apologise for any typos this post may have. If anything is misspelt or confusing, let me know and i will correct it and/or explain it a little better. I couldn’t find much of anything on this case, but i tried to compile everything i could find.
Sources:
https://www.doenetwork.org/cases/software/main.html?id=225ufca
https://unidentified-awareness.fandom.com/wiki/Los_Angeles_Jane_Doe_(1921-1951)
https://unidentified-awareness.fandom.com/wiki/Los_Angeles_John_Doe_(1921-1951)
(Postmortem Warning, Photo of The Girl’s Face/Head) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jane_Doe_1921_-_1951_(2).jpg
(Graphic Content Warning, Various Graphic Postmortem Photos. This link is to a review of the book Death Scenes): https://anil.aggrawal.org/ij/vol_002_no_002/reviews/pb/page003a.html