u/squarebillcrank

So my GSP is turning one and a half next month and I’m curious on if I should get him neutered. I was told by the breeder to wait until about this time but by doing my own research it seemed like waiting until he was around four would be best. From my understanding it’s better for their joints, skin, testosterone, etc… I’m not totally against waiting until four but it would make boarding him a lot easier if I neutered him a bit early. Just figured I’d come here and see when everybody else neutered their pups, if at all. Thanks!

[deleted]

So I just got off the phone with Arkansas game and fish and they said that in Washington county, the navigable river law is voided. They then gave me the number to the county clerks office and it just beeped and disconnected several times lol. From my understanding the navigable river law is a on case by case basis as per county, but still trying to find that in writing. If anybody has recommendations please let me know. Also found this scrolling last night,

“I'm on a comment tear now, so here goes on this one.
This article mixes up several concepts of state v. Fed law, but does get the general rule right that high water mark to high water mark is not privately owned.
In Arkansas, this is not an "easement" as referred to in the article (re California). Instead, high water mark to high water mark is held in "public trust," just like wildlife and fish, by the state This is not the same as public domain). In Arkansas, State v. Mcilroy established this rule for all recreationally navigable streams in the state. There was some confusion here a few weeks ago, but that case specifically rejected a case by case prescriptive easement approach, as each recreationally navigable stream would have required a litigated case. It is possible for the public to acquire a prescriptive easement in Arkansas in some instances like, for example, access to a put in or swimming hole (consider if a new landowner buys a piece of property with a bridge on it that everyone in the community has swam and put in at for years, the new landowner can't cut off access-a prescriptive easement exists). I read Mcilroy to include access to gravel bars and activities such as wade fishing, but there has been no litigation on those specifics. Montana worked all this out through a combination of cases and legislation that I think Arkansas would be well advised to look at.”https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/water-activities/river-rights-battle-heating-up/?scope=anon&fbclid=IwVERDUASwz91leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeG8ZbPJ7MunekSyAI_MYo6ghz8BGhXgG88ShwnIS4o2wRmh0nfmI7p7SvPBA_aem_0q8ohlF-acEofOH2orL2SQ

So I’m fishing this creek and I’m confused on the ruling on this. From all my research, I should be able to pass this line, but wanted to hear other people’s thoughts