Please comment your name and party below - we will not accept any party, platform, or person associated with an IRL political movement!

I think it's good while we have a captive audience to discuss the realities of watching something be unmade after it was made and the acceptance and peace we can have from that.

The purpose of the sand mandala is not simply the creation of a permanent beauty, but instead just the opposite. The point is the impermanent nature of the work. The beauty is momentary, and we have to learn to enjoy good things as they happen, and accept that bad things will end eventually.

I think many of us have heard the cliche "don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened" and I think we can take solace that we can smile for both things - the transitory nature of single events is not meant to be permanent - we should be happy that it is over and happy that we got to enjoy it while it was there.

Many of the subreddit's users were young, and I think on this metaphor even more aptly, because one thing that is important to realize is just as the subreddit was never permanent, neither is the youth and free time to play on it. Enjoy and experience the variety of life and youth while you can. Do not despair that an activity you enjoyed has ended, enjoy that you did indeed get to be apart of it, and enjoy the reality that you shall experience many more things.

Enjoy the break, whatever it ends up being, and accept that like all things - The Democracy of Reddit, at least as it was a few weeks ago - was always transitory. Like the sand of a mandala being returned to nature to feed back into the many cycles of the world, you can think of this as your creative energies being returned to other things. Make art, make posts, come up with games and ideas and new things while you have this time to reflect and become inspired.

Sua Sponte "describes an act of authority taken without formal prompting by another party" ChiliMeowerCat is not a party to NEP in the way his lawsuit flowed. His argument was *on behalf of* the Executive - but that falls to the executive to perform the ruling of.

This is generally called the "real party in interest" Which chili is not.

The Court cannot simply go on massive political panhandling efforts whenever they receive a court case. The Court may NOT act sua sponte - also entails not infringing on the acts of other branches of government in sections outside of their purview.

Illiterate user A. cannot demand Illiterate Judge B. Strike down internal memos from the president to their commander because they want to. Not having Sua Sponte precludes the right of the Court to interfere without express harm or involvement of a plaintiff.

ChiliGPT can't just sue to change every ruling in history, and Printler can't use lawsuits with narrow scope to go outside the scope and change prior case law.

Stay in your lanes.

The whole point of not giving the Court Sua Sponte was to prevent these massive and inept overreaching acts by people with bare concepts of the rule of law.

ChilliFarmer101 vs. Democracy of Reddit

- This does not clear all powers as unconstitutional, as the court finds the Politburo's primary control over foreign exchange & foreign trade, as established under section of the New Economic Plan, "Mechanisms of the Politburo", clause 4. This is because of the Constitution's Article VII, Clause 7, which states that "Provinces may not have their own foreign policy, excluding trade deals and any special cases approved by the president and legislature." The court interprets this clause as allowing provinces to negotiate their own trade policy, and as such, rule that this clause of the New Economic Plan infringes on the rights of the Provinces & strikes the clauses outlined to be unconstitutional.

"interprets this clause as giving an allowance to the provinces, ergo infringes on the rights of the provinces" illiterate nonsense. You cannot be awarded privileges that restricts your rights - you either have right to something inherently, and therefore the privilege is just a "nice addition" or you didn't have the rights to begin with and the privilege establishes access. Typical Printler garbage.

- The court also finds the New Economic Plan's clause under "Structure of the People's Army", stated here, in The structure, organization, and styling of these forces shall be left up to the Grand Marshall and the commanders to decide with the Grand Marshall having final say. The replacement of the Grand Marshall shall be performed only by the Politburo and must meet the following requirements: unconstitutional, as stated in Article III Clause V, it states that The President may at their convenience and desire assemble for themselves a cabinet and delegate functions to their cabinet. As earlier stated in the New Economic plan that "The PAD shall be organized under one supreme commander of these forces titled The Grand Marshall of The People’s Army," it falls under the President's purview as the chief commander, making the Grand Marshall a cabinet-level position. The first clause in the New Economic Plan contradicts Article III Clause V because it blocks the President from replacing the Grand Marshall, a part of their cabinet. As such, all subclauses under this clause are also struck.

The bill has severance. You can't strike all sub articles because one article contradicts you.

"It falls under the President's purview" - right, which Chilli (Despite routine desires to be) is not the president and cannot express harm. It would fall to the President to contradict this, in which case the President would have the right to say 'this isn't true authority - as my authority supercedes'

Further - chief commander means that they have final say over what happens, not who does it, authority in the military flows through a chain of command and simply being top dog does not define every single part of the command chain.

- The court finds the New Economic Plan's first clause under "Baseline Social Needs and Care" to be unconstitutional. By forcing workers above 65 to retire, it violates Article V Clause I of the constitution, which states "l. All Persons will be free from discrimination on the basis of gender, sex, sexuality, race, ethnicity, religion, social class, or age."

By this incredibly defunct definition of "discrimination" providing pensions to old people but not to 27 years olds would also be discrimination. Typical dipshit level reading comprehension.

- The court also finds New Economic Plan's "Legal Notes & Subsystems" Clause 4 to be unconstitutional. Clause 4, which states "4. NEP shall be passed as a normal bill under normal circumstances, but shall require a 75% national referendum to remove, or may be removed in coordination between Parliament, the Politburo, and the President." is unconstitutional due to Article I Section III Clause 1, which states "Parliament may pass laws via a simple majority of those who have voted within a 48 hour period of the presentation of any list of bills." The Constitution already provides a mechanism through which legal provisions may obtain protection from ordinary legislative amendment, which is constitutional amendment under Article VI, which the New Economic Plan is not listed under, and as such, the New Economic Plan's special protection is unconstitutional.

There is no specific portion of cited text that states passage cannot be different than removal within harpy condor.. Try again Printler.

- The court finds that "Legal Notes & Subsystems", Clause 2 is not unconstitutional under the constitution, but only applies to acts passed prior to the New Economic Plan.

Unreadable word slop.

Requested remedy:

A. Where the fuck is the investigation on Prince's misbehavior u/ViktorChernov that request was sent weeks ago.

B. Formal appeal and removal of changes to NEP.

Title

The End to the Reign of Terror Act

Sponsors: u/theslavicbattlemage

Section I. Purpose and Intent

This act aims to eliminate the general chaos the subreddit experiences by limiting the political viability of underage and illiterate users.

Section II. Definitions

Provide clear definitions of key terms used throughout the bill.

Example:

• “Child" shall refer to anyone who is under the age of 18 years of age.
• “Illiterate" shall refer to anyone who is incapable of scoring higher than a B1 on a literacy examination.

Section III. Provisions

Subsection 1: Age

1. No child may hold office within the DoR at the Federal level^(1) No child under the age of 18 shall be allowed to hold office while also failing to have at least a B2 English Proficiency, but shall not be restricted from local elections for this same reason.
2. No child may be awarded a Bar Certification unless:
   1. They have scored a B2 or better on English competency
   2. They are at least 16 years of age
3. Children may hold positions within the cabinet or general non-elected positions.
4. Children may not ever hold a position as Moderator or have access to Modmail.
5. GameMasters taking census data have an obligation to report non-compliance of age limitations.

Subsection 2: Literacy

1. No individual may hold office with a lower grade than a B1 in English literacy. Literacy exams should be reviewed and graded by officials within the Politburo - OR separately given by the GameMasters - at their discretion.
2. No individual may serve as a lawyer or Justice with worse than a B2 in English literacy.
3. Exams may be selected by the Politburo - or relevant testing institutions under the auspices of the Presidency.

Subsection 3: Lawsuits

1. No individual may file lawsuits, represent clients, or act as Judge, Lawyer, or Legal Counsel without a certification from the Bar or IJC on legal competency. Both the Bar and IJC must furnish the system of testing and proof of certification to the Politburo for all registered practitioners of Law.

Section IV. Enforcement

Enforcement shall fall to a joint action between, GameMasters and the Executive authorities responsible for checking these delicate matters. It is of great importance that ages remain a private matter for each individual, and the sharing of details garnered during testing should be kept confidential unless a breach of the rules is observed.

Section V. Implementation and Oversight

This bill shall take immediate effect upon ratification and signature by the President.

Oversight shall be handled by Moderators, the Politburo, or whomever within the executive the President tasks with oversight.

Section VI. Amendments and Repeal

This act may be amended or struck down by simple majority.

Section VII. Effective Date

This Act shall take effect immediately upon passage by Parliament and approval by the President.

ADDENDUM 1: Changed rule to be "must be literate"

Establishes and funds orphanages.

​

Establishes retirement payments and an agency to oversee them.

​

Establishes nursing homes and care facilities.

​

Establishes a hospital in every major city.

​

Creates social insurance.

​

Creates a budget baseline in the event that the government fails to create a budget (very common).

​

Creates a basic tax code

​

Creates a single organized structure for paying the military.

​

Creates public administrators - which literally every government on the planet has. Which are yes, unelected. The officials at the DMV are also unelected. The officials at your local passport office are unelected. The Federal reserve? Which controls the money supply? Unelected. Unelected officials form the bulk of most administrative functions in every government on Earth.

​

Eliminates Landlording!

​

Eliminates homelessness!

​

​

So I don't know

​

- maybe NEP is evil, or maybe you didnt read it -