Foster City vs. Redwood Shores for a waterfront single-family home?
Foster City vs. Redwood Shores for a waterfront single-family home?
My partner and I are considering buying a waterfront single-family home in either Foster City or Redwood Shores. We plan to have two kids, so schools and long-term family suitability are important to us.
We also really like the idea of being able to kayak, paddleboard, or do other water activities directly from or near the house.
For people who have lived in either area, how would you compare:
* Public schools
* Flood and sea-level-rise risk
* Liquefaction/earthquake risk
* Waterfront home maintenance, including docks/seawalls
* Water activities and lagoon access
* Overall family lifestyle
* Long-term resale/desirability
If you were choosing between the two for a home you planned to keep for 15–20+ years, which would you choose and why?