[Fabrizio Romano] AS Monaco and Barcelona have now completed all formal steps of Ansu Fati deal. €11m to Barça, it’s all sealed.
bsky.app[Sport] Ter Stegen could be headed to Ajax
Ajax are looking for an experienced goalkeeper. One of the positions they need to strengthen is goalkeeper, and Ter Stegen's name has surfaced . According to several local media outlets, the Barcelona goalkeeper is one of the profiles being considered by the Amsterdam club's technical staff. His experience, leadership, and footwork are a perfect fit for Ajax's philosophy and also for Míchel's style, who would be delighted to reunite with the goalkeeper he brought to Girona in January.
[Gianluigi Longari] Total confirmation based on the agreement between Barcelona and Bernardo Silva. Absolute approval from the entire Blaugrana management, no need to offload other players to finalize. Just details to iron out to reach the definitive agreement. Imminent.
bsky.app[Mundo Deportivo] Barça confirm: offer to Atlético for Álvarez - The first proposal to sign the Argentine is 100 million euros and was sent by e-mail to Mateu Alemany despite the red and white club's denials.
>FC Barcelona did indeed send a formal offer to Atlético Madrid, as *Mundo Deportivo* was able to confirm through highly credible sources within the *Azulgrana* club. These sources indicate that the club is approaching the attempt to sign the Argentine player as just another standard transfer operation—and is acting accordingly. Hence, an initial proposal of €100 million for Álvarez was sent via email. The recipient was Mateu Alemany, Atlético Madrid’s top sporting executive. News of the offer was first reported by journalist Fabrizio Romano last Friday, only to be denied by Atlético, which circulated its own version of events to various media outlets, claiming it was "yet another lie" emanating from FC Barcelona. However, the offer did exist, and—in the interest of fairness—this must be acknowledged, particularly since the original report was drowned out by the deluge of posts on X (formerly Twitter) and official statements released by Atlético on Friday. Now, it remains to be seen whether or not the *Rojiblanco* club chooses to respond to it—whichever course of action best suits their interests.
The *Azulgrana* organization has no desire for controversy, nor do they wish to engage in a public war of statements and counter-statements accusing Atlético of lying—a move that would carry the risk of provoking yet another public rebuttal from the Madrid-based club. Instead, Barça aims to handle the situation in a professional and dispassionate manner, recognizing it as merely another routine market scenario—the kind that every club faces every season.
In any case, Barça confirms that a proposal was indeed submitted, given the club's keen interest in Julián. Atlético’s aggressive stance—characterized by references to the "Negreira case," comments regarding the registration of players like Olmo and Pau Víctor, and the unauthorized use of images of Barça players on their official X account—has not gone down well at the *Azulgrana* club. Quite the opposite. Nevertheless, the club has no intention of contributing to any further distraction from the core issue. And the core issue remains this: Julián Álvarez wants to leave the *Rojiblanco* club to join FC Barcelona—a desire he has already conveyed to Atlético through his agent, Fernando Hidalgo. Hidalgo is an agent currently being singled out for criticism by Atlético, yet he is doing nothing more than carrying out the specific instructions given to him by his client. An Hidalgo who met with Barça last Wednesday at the Hotel Torre Melina of his own volition—and who went to great lengths to remain unseen, although *Mundo Deportivo* revealed the encounter the very next day. An agent who has already conveyed to Atlético his client's desire to leave this summer, as the player seeks a more ambitious project and finds Barça's proposal highly appealing.
In short, the real issue for Atlético lies with Julián himself—a fact that has become abundantly clear every time the Argentine striker has cast doubt on his future at the club, despite being under contract until 2030. Álvarez has been asked about Barcelona and a potential departure on no fewer than three occasions: in November, during an interview with *L’Équipe*; in March of this year, after scoring a brace against Tottenham in the Champions League; and in late April, prior to the first leg of the Champions League semi-final against Arsenal. On none of these occasions did he close the door on leaving this summer, nor did he rule out a move to the *Azulgrana* club.
It is, of course, Atlético's prerogative to refuse to sell—invoking both his contract running until 2030 and the much-discussed €500 million release clause. However, the undeniable fact remains that an offer from Barça was indeed submitted, and that this offer was endorsed by the player himself through his representative. At the very least, the *Culés* expect a response that adheres to the standard protocols and professional norms of the football transfer market. Regarding the other grievances raised, sources at the Camp Nou have little to add. Any contact made with Julián was solely to gauge whether he was open to hearing about Barcelona's interest—much in the same way that "Cholo" Simeone repeatedly called him in 2024 while he was still at Manchester City, attempting to persuade him to join Atlético despite his active contract with the English club. As Julián himself subsequently acknowledged, such actions fall entirely within the accepted logic of the football world.
According to the sources consulted, the remaining issues of which Atlético complains can no longer be attributed to the *Azulgrana* club. If an Argentine media outlet reports that Julián is looking for a home in Barcelona, the *Azulgrana* club immediately distances itself from the matter—precisely because it has sought to avoid any noise surrounding Julián in recent months, given the double clash in the Copa del Rey and Champions League against *Los Colchoneros* and the risk of being accused of destabilization. Nor does it constitute an official club directive if journalists happen to ask Enrique Cerezo about the player during a visit to Barcelona. By the same token, Atlético is not presumed to be responsible for attempting to destabilize Chelsea or Wolverhampton simply because press reports surface linking the *Rojiblanco* club to Marc Cucurella or João Gomes. The same applies to the reports stating that Mateu Alemany met with the agent of Marc Bernal, a Barça player. Furthermore, neither Laporta, nor Deco, nor Flick has spoken publicly about Julián Álvarez.
What are your expectations for the 26/27 season?
Given the seemingly big investment in the squad this season, what should be expected for the team to archieve?
In my opinion (as of now):
Supercup: W, a 3 peat is very possible.
Copa Del Rey: W, very possible if we make it to semis, difficult to say before that but it is a title that we can "sacrifice" if needed.
La Liga: W, 3 peat is definitely possible if the refs don't get too involved (they will), but if we are consistent, it should be our #30.
UCL: W, extremely difficult but if the investment is major and big players end up coming like Alvarez and others... we should have that standard. UCL is needed to certify the Flick era/project as a success, and I'm very aware that Flick knows that.
2 trophies should be minimum, with 3 as the goal.
What about y'all?
[Esport3] Bernardo Silva’s signing could be official in a matter of hours. Barça would have closed a deal with him, with Bernardo accepting an ‘economised’ offer to sign for the Catalans.
3cat.catWe're all aware for the need of a killer main striker, but I wanted to discuss the backup striker position as well in the case both Lewandowski and Ferran end up leaving, and wanted to highlight a player I've been following more actively for a month or so, and that's Carlos Espi from Levante.
Here's some stats about him:
- 6'4 feet tall
- 20 years of age
- Spanish
- 8 goals in 20 matches with Levante with 893 minutes played (worth noting that he doesn't take penalties for Levante).
- u21 with the national team
In his Fotmob player trait, he has pretty damn high stats considering the team he plays in and role within the team (98% Goals / 94% Defensive contributions are the standouts).
From what I've seen from watching a couple of games with Levante, he is still improving his overall touch / linkup play. Not bad by any means, but def some room to grow.
He's currently valued at 2.5m, no release clause was made public but an extension was automatically signed till 2028 due to him surpassing a certain number of appearances, rumors say it wouldn't surpass 12m without any negotiations with Levante, meaning it could be even lower.
His case reminds me of Diomande last season with Leganes, a player that due to his context wasn't talked about much but once he made the move to a different league, his market value skyrocketed after being proven at a bigger team.
What do you think? Could he be someone the club should bet on to be a good backup option and eventually take over in the future?