what did due diligence reveal that the seller clearly knew about but never mentioned?
i've been looking into what makes businesses actually transferable vs. what just looks good on paper, and i keep finding the most useful stuff comes from the buyer side rather than sellers or brokers.
Specifically curious about the owner-dependence problem. How often did you get into due diligence and realize the business basically couldn't run without the specific person selling it and what did that actually look like? Key relationships that only existed because of the owner personally, institutional knowledge that was never written down, customers who'd followed them for 20 years and might not stay?
And when you found something like that, did it kill the deal or did you just reprice? curious whether it's actually a dealbreaker in practice or whether buyers just factor it in and move on.
Also wondering about the stuff sellers consistently don't disclose voluntarily. Not outright fraud, just the things they know are problems but figure you'll discover yourself. what shows up most often? If you walked away from a deal, what was the real reason