u/windymoto313

I get that the main idea is 'will it hold up to scrutiny in court' but I'm wondering if there are a more concrete set of rules that define the term in the context of eDiscovery. You see in in every single job listing: 'defensible workflows', 'defensible collections', 'defensible approaches throughout the lifecycle of a matter', 'Demonstrated understanding of defensible eDiscovery practices across the EDRM lifecycle.' I feel like an ACEDS book would have a chapter titled 'The 7 deadly fingers of Defensibility in eDiscovery" They even describe the exam as 'a neutral, legally defensible professional certification examination and program.' Sooooooo what does defensible mean where *you* work? BTW I'm a PM. It would help if you tell your role/title in your response.

Need to replace a Presta valve tube for this Kenda tire: 37-622 (700 x 35C - 28 x 1 5/8 x 1 3/8). Just googling around, I'm getting the impression that is is old(er) notation. What I'm seeing for new stuff is that the tube specs specify a range of tires that the tube will work with, like "700 x 35c RELPACES SIZES: 32mm - 45mm" So I'm just trying to see what's an acceptable tube replacement for my tire. What would the specs be for a tube that would fit my tire ? And what's the acceptable "range"?