genuinely asking because it’s borderline unusable for me right now lol
responses are taking forever, sometimes it just hangs mid-generation, gives errors and a couple chats completely froze. my internet is fine and everything else works normally, so I’m guessing it’s on OpenAI’s side?
feels way slower than usual today.
anyone else getting this??
genuinely asking because it’s borderline unusable for me right now lol
responses are taking forever, sometimes it just hangs mid-generation, gives errors and a couple chats completely froze. my internet is fine and everything else works normally, so I’m guessing it’s on OpenAI’s side?
feels way slower than usual today.
anyone else getting this??
genuinely asking because it’s borderline unusable for me right now lol
responses are taking forever, sometimes it just hangs mid-generation, gives errors and a couple chats completely froze. my internet is fine and everything else works normally, so I’m guessing it’s on OpenAI’s side?
feels way slower than usual today..
anyone else getting this??
So I'm just naturally curious but also extremely conflicted about what liberals are. I see that from a leftist point of view they aren't so great. If you want me to clarify where I got this impression from, it's from Hillary Clinton, who appears to be very very pro-human and everything but has absolutely no problem approving CIA ops for instability in the Middle East (is what I read from her leaked emails and shit), as well as supporting Israel and very very openly being against Mamdani when it came to his criticism of Israel. But It's not just that.
See, I have an interesting nuance I want to offer and this is why I'm making this post because I really need some answers. In Pakistan, liberals are even in a more interesting crossroads. They appear to be good well-meaning people who appear to want to introduce things like open-minded thinking, modern culture (you can even say to a certain extent Western Civilization), forward thinking, all these fancy things. Honestly I don't mind most of them but the point is most of these liberals exist only within the elite circles. You will see children of politicians or children of extremely rich people selling this agenda and most of the time they don't really know the ground realities of the country even if they have lived there. Interestingly sometimes these same people kind of make a very strong U-turn when things come to a discussion about secularism, refusing to let go of things like the Islamic Constitution or letting go of religious thinking. Sometimes these people revert back and try to oppose as good Muslims. Other times they go extremely atheist, which means they kinda love playing in the extremes. which confused me a lot.
Because I thought you're supposed to be non-partisan if you are protesting on humanistic ideals. You are not supposed to side with any religion but you're also not supposed to be extremely hateful of other people's religion. It's about giving everyone a chance, right? At least being a decent human being for yourself and for others.
My question after condensing all this that I have written is: what exactly are liberals and why are they bad or why are they, let's say, less favorable? Hillary Clinton is just one example. I just want to know the general idea because currently I am arguing with some other Pakistanis and for them social democracy is better than socialism. They're not fully sold on the leftist part of politics. They still think liberal politics will be better for Pakistan, blah blah blah, stuff like that.
I really need to put the foot down or put the hammer down and tell them why exactly is liberalism political and ideological poison for Pakistan. Why do we need actual leftist thinking, actual socialist thinking and no more of that old BS that people have tried to implement?
As for the "old BS that people have tried to implement", i have an example example for all comrades here. If any of you are aware of Pakistan's history, there was this dictator called Pervez Musharraf. That guy tried to be all secular but he wasn't really secular. He gave the idea of what we called enlightened moderation, which appeared nice at the outset but it was nothing more than a facade because he still gave power and favours to religious parties, even to religious extremists in certain shape or form. The only secularism or the only benefits and fruits of secularism we saw were for the elites. If you weren't, let's say, rich enough or powerful enough, be it a boy or a girl, you couldn't enjoy the same secular society that he and his fellow elites did.
I really need to know
this is a very serious post and I really just want some kind of guidance and some kind of elaboration because liberalism extremely confuses me.
P.S: again, i used voice to text software to write this post - pardon any grammatical errors and feel free to ask for any clarifications!
Seriously. I press Enter to start a new line, and the app just sends the message like it's texting my ex. Every single time. I'm trying to write a response or a prompt, and boom! it's gone. Who designed this?
On iOS. Standard keyboard. No option to remap Enter to new line instead of send. Driving me insane.
Is there a hidden setting I'm missing? A secret gesture? A prayer? Because right now, this app is unusable for anything longer than one sentence.
Tell me there's a fix. Please.
I’m seeing a very frustrating issue with ChatGPT Projects, and I’m trying to figure out if this is a known bug or just something about my setup.
The pattern is:
So it feels like the chat gets "stuck" on the previous topic.
It is not simply forgetting context. It is almost the opposite: it over-anchors on stale context from the previous exchange and ignores the new prompt.
I’ve mostly noticed this inside Projects, not normal standalone chats. It has happened with GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5. It seems more likely when the project has many files, long chats, and several related but different technical topics.
Example structure:
This is especially painful in technical work because it can send you down the wrong path and waste time. I often have to reply with something like:
> "No, that is not what I asked. I changed topic."
Has anyone else seen this in ChatGPT Projects?
My questions:
I’m also planning to report this to OpenAI Support, but I wanted to see if other heavy Project users are seeing the same behavior.
For now, the best term I can think of is "Project context bleed" or "stale-topic anchoring inside Projects."
I’m seeing a very frustrating issue with ChatGPT Projects, and I’m trying to figure out if this is a known bug or just something about my setup.
The pattern is:
So it feels like the chat gets "stuck" on the previous topic.
It is not simply forgetting context. It is almost the opposite: it over-anchors on stale context from the previous exchange and ignores the new prompt.
I’ve mostly noticed this inside Projects, not normal standalone chats. It has happened with GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5. It seems more likely when the project has many files, long chats, and several related but different technical topics.
Example structure:
This is especially painful in technical work because it can send you down the wrong path and waste time. I often have to reply with something like:
> "No, that is not what I asked. I changed topic."
Has anyone else seen this in ChatGPT Projects?
My questions:
I’m also planning to report this to OpenAI Support, but I wanted to see if other heavy Project users are seeing the same behavior.
For now, the best term I can think of is "Project context bleed" or "stale-topic anchoring inside Projects."
I’m seeing a very frustrating issue with ChatGPT Projects, and I’m trying to figure out if this is a known bug or just something about my setup.
The pattern is:
So it feels like the chat gets "stuck" on the previous topic.
It is not simply forgetting context. It is almost the opposite: it over-anchors on stale context from the previous exchange and ignores the new prompt.
I’ve mostly noticed this inside Projects, not normal standalone chats. It has happened with GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5. It seems more likely when the project has many files, long chats, and several related but different technical topics.
Example structure:
This is especially painful in technical work because it can send you down the wrong path and waste time. I often have to reply with something like:
> "No, that is not what I asked. I changed topic."
Has anyone else seen this in ChatGPT Projects?
My questions:
I’m also planning to report this to OpenAI Support, but I wanted to see if other heavy Project users are seeing the same behavior.
For now, the best term I can think of is "Project context bleed" or "stale-topic anchoring inside Projects."
also, why are crossposts disabled in this sub?!
i wanted to share some stuff but reddit says crossposts aren't allowed... why?!