r/50501Arizona

An estimated 25k Mesa residents have lost SNAP since last July.
▲ 248 r/50501Arizona+3 crossposts

An estimated 25k Mesa residents have lost SNAP since last July.

I live in Mesa and write a policy newsletter. This is my own analysis. Sources at the bottom.

H.R. 1 (better known as 'The Big Beautiful Bill') changed SNAP eligibility and pushed part of the program's cost onto states. Arizona has lost roughly 437,000 recipients since July 2025, the biggest drop of any state in the US. DES reports caseload by county every month, but there's no official figure for Mesa or for any Arizona city. So I estimated one for all 397 places in the state by splitting each county's reported caseload using Census SNAP household shares. These are estimates, but they are based on real county-level and state-level data.

https://preview.redd.it/b8cix9h2d1kh1.png?width=1072&format=png&auto=webp&s=c9ec28991b5bad2889d8db22b074e006b66784ca

The first figure is the map. Mesa is one of the larger blue circles in Maricopa County. An estimated 25,000 Mesa residents lost food assistance between July 2025 and June 2026, which is 4.9% of the city's population. About 9.9% of Mesa residents participated in the SNAP program last July and 4.9% this June. About 1 in 10 people here, down to about 1 in 20.

The second figure ranks places by how many people lost benefits. Mesa is third in the state behind Phoenix at 114,637 and Tucson at 49,936, ahead of Glendale, Chandler, and Yuma. Each bar splits adults and children. Roughly 11,000 of Mesa's are children. Statewide the child figure is over 200,000.

https://preview.redd.it/x9pbnxcdd1kh1.png?width=1220&format=png&auto=webp&s=7584aa12732f1931586722030e47639c3953afed

The third figure shows the twenty Arizona communities where SNAP reached at least a third of residents last July. Mesa is not on it, since more rural Arizona communities are the places that are more dependent on SNAP as a percentage of total population. Only one Maricopa County place is, and that is Guadalupe which went from 41% to 20%.

Mesa's estimated loss is $58.4 million a year in benefits, again third in the state. That is $114 per Mesa resident in grocery spending that was happening here and is not anymore.

https://preview.redd.it/a0sy17vhd1kh1.png?width=1220&format=png&auto=webp&s=9816ebce713af63db1673cc3e19e69450a69933e

United Food Bank's director of agency network said this spring that the warehouse is at capacity and distribution is up 10 to 12% every month. How does Mesa feel about the SNAP cuts? Know any of the 437,000 people in Arizona or the 25,000 in Mesa who have been impacted?

Method and the full table for all 397 Arizona cities, towns, and communities: Arizona's SNAP Collapse in 397 Cities, Towns, and Communities

reddit.com
u/Beautiful_Aerie6775 — 2 days ago
▲ 54 r/50501Arizona+2 crossposts

Axe Axon

Axon is operating ALPRs in our cities just like Flock. Tempe is currently testing Axon's cameras as an alternative to Flock's, and we need to make sure all ALPRs are not welcome.

Join us at Axon's headquarters in Scottsdale to watch them just like they watch us. Bring binoculars, telescopes, cameras, etc.

u/eastvalleyunite — 4 days ago
▲ 195 r/50501Arizona+3 crossposts

Tonight We Are Packing City Council Chambers In Opposition To ALPRs (Non-Partisan Issue)

TLDR: Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) are mass surveillance technologies that violate our Fourth Amendment right to privacy. We are packing the City Council Chambers for tonight’s meeting to demand that Chandler’s Flock cameras (which are no longer being used by the city) are physically covered up, and that an ordinance be passed prohibiting the city from using ALPRs. Wear red to signify your opposition to ALPRs.

Today, August 13, 6pm

Chandler City Council Chambers (88 E Chicago St)

More information: https://eastvalleyunite.org/flock/

As a progressive advocacy organization we often don’t post in general forums such as this one, but we have seen strong non-partisan support for efforts against not just Flock, but all ALPRs, so we’re sharing this here. 

First, Chandler is no longer using the 40 Flock cameras posted around the city. However, they have not been taken down yet, and as far as we are aware, can still be accessed by Flock and other agencies. We need the cameras physically covered up immediately. There have been instances from Evanston, Illinois, to Troy, New York, to other cities, where Flock has kept operating cameras after a contract has terminated, simply not taking them down, or even after they are taken down, putting them back up. 

Second, we need an ordinance stopping the city from continuing this mass surveillance system under the name of another company, like Axon. ALPRs capture information on every single vehicle that passes by. This includes not only a car’s license plate, but date, time, location, and increasingly, make, model, bumper stickers, dents, and any other identifiable characteristics that can be picked up by the AI systems embedded in this surveillance technology. This type of dragnet surveillance is what violates our constitutional rights. The ACLU argues that using ALPR systems gives the government “unprecedented powers of surveillance that upset traditional expectations of privacy in violation of the Fourth Amendment”. This is an issue that applies to all ALPRs, not just from Flock. This includes Axon, Motorola, Genetec, Leonardo, and any other ALPR company. 

We have been working with the ACLU of Arizona to draft an ordinance to ban ALPRs. It would prohibit the City of Chandler from installing or operating any ALPR system, or accessing ALPR data from other agencies or private entities. To get this ordinance passed though, we need to continue the momentum we had against Flock to push the city council to introduce and pass it. The ordinance won’t be formally introduced by a councilmember tonight, but we’re packing the room to pressure them to do so soon. To send a strong visual signal, we are encouraging people to wear red to signify their opposition to ALPRs. Because we don’t have an agenda item, if you plan to speak, it will technically be under “unscheduled public appearances” when you fill out the speaker card. We will have copies of the ordinance available at the council meeting tonight if you would like to see the language. You can also reach out to us at info@eastvalleyunite.org.

People from across the political spectrum support our efforts. From democrats, to republicans, to socialists, to libertarians, the vast majority of people can see that ALPRs are unconstitutional warrantless mass surveillance. Let’s continue the fight to keep Flock and all ALPRs out of Chandler for good!

u/eastvalleyunite — 7 days ago
▲ 88 r/50501Arizona+3 crossposts

Why is Proposition 320 a Trick?

From a post on fb ...by Jimmy Arwood, an advocate for schools ... (thanks for the great explainer!)

TL;DR: All the propositions on the Arizona November are tricks -- except for Prop. 212 (Protect Education/voucher reform). Vote NO on all but Prop. 212.

Action Item: Share this information with your community groups and on your own socials. Prop. 320 will mean closing a lot of neighborhood schools that our communities rely on ...after districts will be financially unable to keep them open.

Why is Proposition 320 a Trick?

It has to do with wording.

Today, AZ school districts spend 68% of the dollars they receive on the classroom. This includes teacher pay, math and literacy coaches, special education professionals etc.

They spend 12% on maintaining facilities, 5% on transporting students, 5% on preparing and serving meals. School districts spend the final 10% on administration.

Not only is the spending on administration lower than states like Texas and Florida, Arizona spends the least on administration in the country.

So if Arizona spends less than any other state in the country on administration, and spends nearly 7 in every 10 dollars on the classroom, why should it be so hard to spend 60% on direct instruction as Prop 320 requires?

Wording. Direct instruction vs. classroom spending.

Prop 320 states that AZ’s Auditor General is to define direct instruction. However, the auditor general currently defines classroom spending and direct instruction DIFFERENTLY- by excluding many pieces that are considered classroom spending.

So what does the auditor general exclude that are considered classroom spending?

Special Education professionals? Auditor General excludes this from direct instruction.

Counselors and nurses? Auditor General excludes this from direct instruction.

Librarians, teacher training, technology for the classroom? Yeah those are all excluded too.

Math and Literacy Coaches that are there to help students perform better? You guessed it - excluded.

But lots of things are excluded that are necessary for schools too that aren’t considered classroom spending:

Transporting students to school, or school sports and maintaining sports venues? Also excluded.

Even just feeding kids or repairing a broken A/C? That is excluded.

Even worse yet -

School security, and school safety? These are excluded.

Prop 320 wants to make it seem like 60% of direct instruction should be simple and easy for schools to meet.

The reality?

It’s downright dangerous for kids.

While the state average for classroom spending is 68%, the state average for direct instruction is 52%.

This means that districts would have to cut close to 20% of the ENTIRE rest of their budget in order to meet the mandate of Prop 320.

And if schools don’t meet it?

The fund that helps pay teachers called the classroom site fund?

Yeah so that gets slashed 25% every year, and by year 4 of non-compliance, it would be zeroed out.

Vote no on Prop 320.

Oh and if you don’t believe me? Here’s a screenshot where you can see it for yourself on the Arizona Auditor General’s website.

I’m happy to answer any questions.

https://preview.redd.it/f3736k0qs8jh1.png?width=2430&format=png&auto=webp&s=abf57ea7927a8096c2eb6c78075e4032c27ea69a

reddit.com
u/Beautiful_Aerie6775 — 7 days ago
▲ 252 r/50501Arizona+3 crossposts

After Flock Win, Chandler Residents To Pack August 13 Council Meeting For End Of All ALPRs

Now that Flock is gone, local residents want to make sure that another ALPR company, such as Axon, can’t take Flock’s place. “We don’t want the police to just continue this mass surveillance system under the name of another company,” said Taylortaft, “which is why we’re pushing for an ordinance to prohibit the city from using ALPRs in any way.” He says that could include stopping the city from contracting with a company for the purpose of using ALPRs, both fixed, like traditional Flock Falcon cameras, and mobile, such as those mounted to police vehicles, in addition to prohibiting accessing ALPR data from ALPRs on private property, such as those located at a Home Depot or Lowe’s location, or those used by HOA’s.

eastvalleyunite.org
u/eastvalleyunite — 8 days ago
▲ 37 r/50501Arizona+1 crossposts

Missouri Voters Reject GOP Measures To Replace Income Tax With Sales Tax & Make Voter Initiatives More Difficult To Get On Ballot

This is what that slimy traitor Biggs wants to do in AZ. Don’t be fooled.

upolitics.com
u/luckymountain — 7 days ago
▲ 56 r/50501Arizona+4 crossposts

Sign up for the Wall Watch: Document construction, environmental damage, and surveillance infrastructure in your community

The Border Chronicle is proud to announce the launch of Wall Watch, a border-wide, community-powered mapping project.

The Trump administration is quickly moving to finish walling off the nearly 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border. What most Americans don’t realize is that what’s being built is not just a 30-foot wall but a “wall system.” This means two layers of a 30-foot-high wall along with 150-foot-wide enforcement roads, surveillance towers, stadium lights, and cameras. In Texas, this includes a more than 500-mile chain of buoys on the Rio Grande—each buoy weighing a ton—that will serve as a secondary wall.

This taxpayer megaproject will cost more than the Panama Canal, or the Hoover Dam, to build. And it will continue costing Americans billions to maintain for generations. With more than $46 billion in taxpayer money to spend in the next three years, a handful of private contractors are dynamiting mountains, pumping aquifers dry, closing public roads, and building walls through communities and environmentally sensitive areas, with little or no input from border residents, wildlife and environmental experts, or tribal nations.

The Department of Homeland Security has waived all federal laws that would require community input and impact studies.

We built the web-based Wall Watch app so that border residents can document construction, environmental damage, and surveillance infrastructure in their communities, allowing us to better understand what is happening on the ground in the absence of any meaningful information from the federal government. Our intention with Wall Watch is to create—for the first time—an interactive border-wide map for the public with reliable data that is continually updated.

Residents from across the border region can document and upload reports to the Wall Watch map. An example of a community report from Eagle Pass, Texas.

Eagle Pass, Texas, resident Amerika Garcia Grewal, an early tester of Wall Watch’s community reports, called it “seamless for regular folks to document, verify, and expose border construction. I was using it on a laptop and on a phone, and it was easy to use, easy to upload, and easy to document.”

Garcia Grewal added, “For those of us who live along the Rio Grande, we have a basic right to know what’s happening in our own backyards, and what’s going into the water that we depend on. Wall Watch helps bring to light a process that’s been completely hidden in the dark. Neither the federal government nor the State of Texas has given us accurate or timely answers. Administrations come and go, but we were here before them, and we’re going to be here after them. Wall Watch and The Border Chronicle are ensuring the public, not political agendas, control the record of what’s happening to our land and our homes.”

This was echoed by another early community tester, Myles Traphagen, a GIS data specialist and science writer at the Tucson, Arizona, environmental nonprofit Cuenca los Ojos. Traphagen said, “With border wall construction projects occurring along nearly 2,000 miles in mostly remote parts of four states, it’s difficult to comprehend the extent and magnitude of it all. Wall Watch is a much-needed tool that concerned citizens and elected officials can use to see the excessive waste of resources and wanton destruction of our public lands.”

How to Use the Wall Watch App

The Wall Watch app is simple to use. Just go to https://wallwatch.theborderchronicle.com/. There, you can view different layers of existing and current border wall construction, as well as other border infrastructure, including surveillance infrastructure. You can submit a report on wall construction, surveying, buoy barrier staging or installation, etc., in your community with geocoordinates, a written description, and photographs to be uploaded to the interactive map.

The Border Chronicle plans to maintain this map for years to come, updating it with useful data as we receive it. The web-based app was built by Matt Crocker, founder of Rioplex Technology in South Texas, and Dugan Meyer, a Tucson-based geographer who serves as the Wall Watch administrator and The Border Chronicle’s resident data and GIS specialist. Dugan will receive the community reports, vet them, and then add the approved reports to the map. The Wall Watch project director is (me) Melissa del Bosque, a Border Chronicle cofounder and its executive director. Additional information about the project, including our privacy policy, methodology, and data sources, can be found on the Wall Watch website.

Steal Our Data, Please!

The public is free to use Wall Watch data. We ask only that you cite Wall Watch and The Border Chronicle in your work. For assistance with downloading data or questions, contact Dugan Meyer or Melissa del Bosque at wallwatch@theborderchronicle.com.

We want to thank the many researchers and organizations whose data has made Wall Watch possible. You can read the full list of acknowledgments here, under “Data Sources by Map Layer.” We’ve taken that data, added our own, and will also add the community report data as it comes in.

We Need Your Support

The Border Chronicle was founded in 2021 by me and Todd Miller. We are independent journalists who have reported on the U.S.-Mexico border for the last two decades. Fun fact: I wrote my first border wall investigation in 2008 for The Texas ObserverThe Border Chronicle relies on paid subscribers and grant support to exist. As the only independent border-wide publication in the country, The Border Chronicle is uniquely positioned for a project like Wall Watch, which no other outlet or organization would likely commit to.

So if you feel that this project is valuable and useful, please support our work as a paid subscriber or with a donation. We would like to keep The Border Chronicle and Wall Watch running for many years to come, but we will need your help!

u/Beautiful_Aerie6775 — 9 days ago
▲ 41 r/50501Arizona+2 crossposts

Socialism ... and Arizona Companies. and an Action item - asking our Congressmen some hard questions.

Just a headsup - our Trump regime has bought huge stakes in some major companies with Arizona ties. Government ownership of private corporations -- isn't that the key component of socialism? Please call out our congressfolk on this.

Some action items:

💥 Call out our GOP reps on social media about why they are voting for our Administration to buy up chunks of corporations. Why are they not standing up to our administration on this issue? And ask them: Doesn't this make you a socialist?

David Schweikert (District 1), Eli Crane (District 2), Andy Biggs (District 5) **running for AZ governor**, Juan Ciscomani (District 6), Abraham Hamadeh (District 8), and Paul Gosar (District 9)

💥Reach out to our US senators about opposing an upcoming defense spending bill that OKs Pentagon purchases of equity stakes.

Background .... over the last few months, our regime has purchased huge chunks in tech and military contractors.

Several of the companies in the government's equity portfolio have major operational ties, manufacturing hubs, or strategic investments in Arizona

  • Intel (Chandler, AZ): [Primary AZ Impact] Intel is one of Arizona's largest private employers. The federal equity deal is tied to CHIPS Act funding meant to finance Intel’s multi-billion-dollar expansion of its Ocotillo mega-site campus in Chandler, Arizona.
  • GlobalFoundries (Phoenix Metro): GlobalFoundries maintains operations and engineering design footprints in Arizona, benefiting from regional semiconductor cluster investments across the state.
  • PsiQuantum (Tempe / Phoenix): PsiQuantum has partnered with Arizona universities and state innovation hubs to deploy advanced quantum computing infrastructure and research partnerships in the Phoenix metropolitan area.

And ... it looks like our Department of War (defense?) is poised to start acquiring huge stakes in companies as well ... according to the latest version of the  National Defense Authorization Act. Some of these companies have already received juicy loans from the Pentagon (and at least one of them has a large equity stake owned by the Trump family.) The NDAA is now stuck in the Senate after getting passed by the House.

For more info:

https://www.cato.org/blog/government-ownership-stakes-companies-becoming-routine-under-trump

https://www.cato.org/blog/senate-ndaa-would-give-pentagon-equity-portfolio

https://www.propublica.org/article/donald-trump-jr-vulcan-deal-white-house

reddit.com
u/Beautiful_Aerie6775 — 13 days ago
▲ 115 r/50501Arizona+2 crossposts

We got Flock out of Chandler, and we still need you to show up on August 13!

We got Flock out of Chandler. We still need everyone to show up on August 13! Now that Flock is out of our city, we need to ensure no ALPR company can take their place. Not Axon, not anyone. Join us to demand an ordinance blocking the city from using ANY ALPRs to prevent them from continuing this mass surveillance system through another company.

u/eastvalleyunite — 13 days ago
▲ 19 r/50501Arizona+1 crossposts

Partners Movie Screening 8/11/26

The union Starbucks Workers United is hosting a movie screening of Partners that covers the beginning of their movement in Buffalo. Local Phoenix SBWU union Baristas will be there to share their experiences and discuss the film after the screening. Please, if able to, 🙏 share far and wide they put this together on short notice to gain support for upcoming direct actions.

u/Weary-Inspector-6971 — 11 days ago