r/AlienBodies

A few of them appear to have gold implants.

​

​Desmontando otra narrativa sensacionalista: Análisis de "Alien Archivist" y el caso Killmer

​

​Hola a todos.

​Últimamente he visto circular este enlace de Substack ([alienarchivist.substack.com/p/killmer](https://alienarchivist.substack.com/p/killmer)) y creo que es fundamental hacer un control de calidad y desenmascarar el patrón que sigue este tipo de publicaciones antes de que se venda como "evidencia" o "revelación exclusiva".

​Aquí detallo los puntos débiles y las banderas rojas (red flags) de este texto:

​1. Falta de fuentes primarias y verificables

​El artículo recurre a la clásica táctica del storytelling conspirativo: nombres de supuestos testigos, agencias de inteligencia o archivos "clasificados" de los que curiosamente no existe un solo registro oficial, documento desclasificado mediante FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) ni rastro académico/periodístico independiente.

​2. Formato Substack y monetización del sensacionalismo

​Substack es una plataforma excelente para blogs independientes, pero carece de revisión por pares (peer-review) o control editorial. Muchos creadores de contenido crean narrativas ficticias o exageran historias del fenómeno UAP/extraterrestre para construir una audiencia cautiva, ganar suscriptores de pago o generar tráfico a través de teorías de conspiración.

​3. Estructura narrativa cliché (El patrón del fraude)

​El héroe/informante incomprendido: Presentan la historia de "Killmer" bajo el tropo del científico, militar o investigador que descubrió la "verdad" y fue silenciado o ignorado por el establishment.

​Datos técnicos imprecisos: Se utilizan pseudotérminos científicos o jerga militar vaga para dar una falsa sensación de rigurosidad, sin aportar ecuaciones, análisis espectrográficos ni metodologías replicables.

​Efecto "La prueba definitiva está por llegar": Prometen revelaciones o continuación de los datos, pero nunca entregan evidencia dura (imágenes en alta resolución, muestras físicas analizadas por laboratorios independientes, etc.).

​4. Incoherencias históricas y de contexto

​Al contrastar la cronología planteada en el texto con registros históricos o eventos conocidos del fenómeno UAP, la narrativa se cae por su propio peso o recicla mitos urbanos ya desmentidos en los años 80 y 90, adaptándolos con nombres nuevos para una audiencia moderna.

​Conclusión

​Debemos aprender a separar la investigación seria del fenómeno de los blogs que lucran con la credulidad. Si un post de Substack no ofrece documentos cotejables, cadenas de custodia claras para sus afirmaciones o respaldo de investigadores reconocidos, no es más que ficción especulativa disfrazada de investigación.

A YouTube blogger ProtoCivilization (language Rus, location Latam) says he bought this head from the same person who found tridactyls. He says, the 'head' doesn't have a body to it.

He has streamed cleaning process, and will continue on Saturday. Here he shows the inside: https://www.youtube.com/live/5pfMM9TQKzo?t=4524&is=xpPBXz5o7piQfJDi (starting 1:15:25)

Here is some close up cleaning with the brush: https://www.youtube.com/live/7OBTnHTS7OQ?t=4249&is=YxMubo8CArlv7b1U

He does not insist that it's an alien or something, but is trying to find clear evidence of tampering, given that it allegedly comes from the same source as tridactyls. So far, he says he hasn't found any, but is ready to break it open to demonstrate if he has clear signs that it's some cat's spine wrapped into chicken skin.

I assume we have members here who can clearly explain if it's some unknown reptile species, a dry fish on a stick or papier mache.

He has CT scans, Xrays and so on, and is ready to send it to doctors, you can contact him in Telegram or email, contacts are in the video description. Not sure if I am allowed to publish them here. Edit: Says he hasn't yet published them because he has just got them, these streams were today and yesterday.

THE UNIVERSITY AND THE U.S. SCIENTIST WHO REQUESTED ANONYMITY

Let us return to the investigation into the Nazca beings.

As part of our collaboration agreement, in which we regularly shared progress, challenges, and also setbacks, Dr. Zúñiga told me about an important DNA and genetics specialist who was a researcher and professor at one of the most important universities in the United States and who was interested in working with us.

I contacted him, and we had two days of a friendly but tense interview before he decided to participate in the investigation. The questions began, the doubts, the how, the why.

He asked me whether we had the results of the DNA studies carried out in Canada. He would respect them more if we made them public in one of the most important genetics databases in the world, belonging to the United States (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Boldly, I told him he could count on it, without knowing the enormous commitment I was making or how complicated what I had promised would be. He also confessed to me that his Anthropology department was hesitant to participate because a professor there was friends with a woman from Peru’s Ministry of Culture who had discredited the case.

The first thing I did was go speak with Jaime Maussan to find out whether he had the hard drive containing the information in his possession and whether he would provide it to me for this task. He said to me: “Do you know how much information there is in bytes?” I replied: “I have no idea, Jaime.” “There’s a lot, a tremendous amount! It’s gigabytes,” he answered.

This study cost more than $50,000 USD and was carried out thanks to GAIA in Canada. Once I had it in hand, I went to Dr. Ocelotl, one of Mexico’s most important geneticists, and gave him the American professor’s message. He told me: “Of course I know that extremely important database, and I know how to upload it, but I must tell you that it is complicated and time consuming.” I told him it was very important to do it, and he kindly agreed and began the upload. Without wanting to pressure him, I cautiously asked how long it would take to upload. He replied that perhaps it would take days.

The next morning, he called me and told me that there was no species nomenclature that resembled the specimens and that he would upload it as Homo sapiens. Although from the nomenclature we would know that these were the mummies, there was no other option.

I notified the American doctor and, to tell the truth, I found him very skeptical about this undertaking; in fact, I felt that he thought I was lying to him.

The computers had been working for more than 48 hours, and we still had not uploaded a single sample. When he told me that only 12% remained, I felt great joy. That joy disappeared the following day when he gave me the bad news: “The system aborted the transfer; we have to start over.” And so another three days passed, until he told me: “Finally, the first specimen has been successfully uploaded.”

I immediately spoke with the doctor, telling him that one specimen had already been uploaded and that I was sending him the links. He asked me to call him back in 30 minutes because he wanted to verify it. I called him again, and in a joyful tone he told me: “Now I believe you, Mr. Achirica. Please upload the rest as soon as possible.” I returned to Dr. Ocelotl, and after two and a half weeks, everything had been uploaded.

In the United States, the work began, and each day the results became more promising. However, the hourly cost of the SUPERCOMPUTER was very high; the anonymous doctor even invested his own resources, and as of the closing date of this publication, we are searching for funding or partners, particularly specialists, who can help us continue moving forward with him.

Any qualified denialist or detractor can begin investigating and realize that we walk hand in hand with the Science of Truth.

Despite the compelling results, the attacks have been enormous. For that reason, I asked Dr. Piotti for advice regarding so many people who oppose the research. He wisely replied: “If those who speak without knowledge do not have the academic credentials necessary for the analysis, it is best not to waste your time with them; they are not worth it. When a high-level professor comes along, we will gladly speak with them and enjoy discussing this discovery.”

It's in his book called Expediente Abierto.

Link: https://tridactyls.org/unica-update