I sincerely believe this is the best video of an NHI ever captured by human beings. The famous video of the two young Russians that has been circulating online for over 15 years — and has never been debunked. The whole story about it being assembled from pieces of chicken and modeling clay is grotesque… not at this level of detail for a ‘hoax.’
In honor of the 🐐
I think in one of the in-color clips (Bob's skin was yellow-ish or tan? ) Might make another Bob tanned instead of silver 😂
😳😱👽🇧🇷 MORE FROM THE DELETED REDDIT FILES (OPERATION PRATO / COLARES, PA)
"I have an insanely interesting video that I received from a group of ufologists on Telegram. You can see an alien hybrid, fetus, or something else, I don't know. At the end of the video there is a description of the container. Perhaps South American colleagues can briefly translate it. A smuggled video of the storage of a kept or surviving alien."
I Just came upon the above post on X
I Google translated it so not sure it will be 100% correct as I do not speak Portuguese.
What do you guys think? It looks pretty legit to me.
More info on Operação Prato can be found googling around, but here is a start:
This is an actual thorough paper. The technique to how they did this low temperature cure is unknown to us. https://www.academia.edu/167025997/Prehistoric_artifacts_of_Mesoamerica_anthropological_evidence_of_ET_paleocontact
Easier Download for the lazy - https://smallpdf.com/file#s=ab6eb9f6-8c49-4102-8224-1815183fd2e7
Conclusion
The multi-analytical investigation of the Aztlan collection, an assemblage of over 10,000 specimens from the southern highlands of Jalisco, Mexico, presents a significant challenge to traditionally established anthropological and archaeological timelines. The convergence of multi-modal data provides a robust scientific foundation for the classification of these artifacts as sophisticated, anthropogenic geopolymer composites of antiquity. High-resolution SEM analysis reveals a hierarchical microstructure consisting of a disordered aluminosilicate gel matrix interspersed with nano-fibrillar polymeric chains and relic kaolinite platelets—diagnostic features of a chemically engineered geopolymerization process rather than natural lithification.
The stoichiometric variance observed via EDS, specifically a Poly(sialate) framework with an atomic Si/Al ratio near 1.00, validates the anthropogenic engineering of a low-temperature geopolymer from aluminosilicate precursors. Crucially, the detected secular disequilibrium in the Uranium-238 decay series, evidenced by the significant depletion of 214Pb and 214Bi relative to 226Ra, confirms that the material underwent unique chemical processing involving isotopic fractionation. This unique characteristic of the artifacts is entirely inconsistent with natural geological specimens or traditionally fired ceramics.
The microstructural integration of organic carbon within this inorganic framework is corroborated by excitation-dependent photoluminescence, shifting from green to yellow under variable UV wavelengths (365nm to 395nm). This phenomenon is characteristic of encapsulated Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs) (Baker & Baker, 2010), suggesting a sophisticated manufacturing process where organic resins were carbonized in-situ within the geopolymerizing matrix. Furthermore, the consistency of AMS radiocarbon dating (~8,570 years BP) across both internal geopolymeric cores and external resinous adhesives establishes a unified mid-Holocene chronological horizon. These findings necessitate a paradigm shift in Mesoamerican archaeometry, demonstrating that a Pre-Ceramic population possessed an advanced mastery of material science and molecular-level chemical manipulation. The Aztlan collection provides a vast empirical dataset evidencing theories of ancient high technology and extraterrestrial influence.
Beyond chemical synthesis, the presence of linguistically structured inscriptions with morphological affinities to Isthmian script suggests this geopolymer technology served as a foundational medium for prehistoric epigraphy, predating Olmec-centric models by several millennia. These engravings frequently illustrate themes of genetic hybridization and extraterrestrial contact, providing a physical record that correlates with the paleocontact hypothesis popularized by von Däniken (1968). Unlike previous speculative interpretations, this study applies a lens of direct material science to provide empirical substantiation. The complexity of these depictions—including astronomical events, UFO craft, and embryonic hybrid beings—demands interdisciplinary inquiry (Donini, A., & Hrico, T., 2025).
By contextualizing these finds within the framework of Exogenesis, we acknowledge the possibility of a prehistoric cultural legacy characterized by genetic exchange with non-human intelligences occurring in Mesoamerica. The iconographic themes of genomic intervention parallel the directed panspermia hypothesis of Crick and Orgel (1973) and the research of Fenton (2020) regarding anomalies in the human genome, such as the fusion of Chromosome 2. Furthermore, modern genetic discoveries of hybridization via nonparental haplotype substitutions on Chromosome 3 provide a potential biological correlate to the ancient hybridization events depicted in the Aztlan iconography (Myakishev-Rempel, 2025). signatures of Genomic SETI provides a dual-evidence framework for investigating prehistoric exogenesis demonstrated in the Aztlan collection. While mainstream archaeology remains skeptical due to a lack of traditional context, the material data remains an empirical outlier that requires further scientific explanation. The creators of these artifacts likely engineered the durability of geopolymer ceramics specifically to ensure that the record of ET paleocontact would survive across vast historical timescales as a cultural heritage.
Ultimately, the evaluation of the Aztlan collection is not merely a study of ancient ceramics, but an anthropological investigation into the genesis of our species. Future research must prioritize blinded replication of AMS 14C results and utilize advanced characterization techniques such as TEM, EBSD, XRD, and FTIR to further characterize the sophisticated and complex materials present within the collection. Only through robust, interdisciplinary research can the Aztlan collection be formally integrated into the global archaeological record as evidence of a genuine prehistoric intersection between humanity and extraterrestrial intelligence.
***EDIT***
I am adding two videos to the post because there seems to be a lot of questions. I suggest the first video, it is slower paced and focuses more on the geopolymer aspect.
[Video] Trevor Hawke - Evidence of Alien Contact in 8,500-Year-Old Artifacts from Mexico, May 9 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1OSz0bxEwk
[Video] Acd for Squares - Scientist Reveals Artifacts Proving Our Alien Origin | E93 Trevor Hawke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsuyupgJtTc&t=11s
I’ve been looking into these "mummified aliens" shown to the Mexican Congress. Was there ever an official confirmation, or was it proven to be a hoax? I don't remember much noise about it at the time, or maybe I just wasn't around during the peak of the discussion. What’s the final verdict on this?
​
Most people online keep talking about Roswell.
But honestly?
One of the most unsettling cases may be the Rendlesham Forest incident in the UK.
What makes this case different is not “alien stories.”
It’s the amount of military involvement and official documentation attached to it.
In December 1980, multiple U.S. Air Force personnel stationed near RAF Bentwaters reported strange lights inside Rendlesham Forest.
Some witnesses described:
a triangular craft,
unusual symbols,
bright lights moving through the trees,
and even radiation readings taken at the site.
Deputy base commander Charles Halt later recorded audio in real time while investigating the phenomenon himself.
That audio still exists.
And this is where the debate becomes interesting.
Skeptics argue the lights may have been:
lighthouse beams,
stars,
misidentifications,
or exaggerated memories developed over time.
But supporters of the case point out:
multiple military witnesses,
official memorandums,
recorded audio,
radiation measurements,
and inconsistencies in missing government files.
Personally, I don’t think Rendlesham proves extraterrestrial life.
But I also don’t think the “it was just a lighthouse” explanation fully explains why trained military personnel reacted the way they did for years afterward.
And maybe that’s why this case never disappears from public discussion.
Not because it gives clear answers.
But because even decades later, it still feels unresolved.
What do you think actually happened in Rendlesham Forest?