r/BitcoinKnots

Ann. regarding Bitcoin / BPedo - LukeDashJr. But BTC since 2009 does store any data incl illegal, and bip110 also can't stop it.

Ann. regarding Bitcoin / BPedo - LukeDashJr. But BTC since 2009 does store any data incl illegal, and bip110 also can't stop it.

u/metalzip — 7 days ago

Question: any indication of community support

There might be various ways to create an coin alternative to "regular" Bitcoin, such as switching PoW algo, merge-mining,...

But I gather that luke-jr says (or, was saying?) that there is a majority support, consensus, among the users of Bitcoin (of non-bip110 and bip110 groups combined) for bip110.

I wonder how luke-jr came to that conclusion in the past? And, now where miners have spoken (2 mined blocks on bip110 side, below 1% of blocks) is that still his view - and why?

  1. miners signalling: by marking that bit (bit 4?) in blocks before the fork-day - it was already around 2% or less; and after fork-day, actual PoW power mining the split chain was similar or lower

  2. amount of users weighted by total buying power (e.g. number of owned Bitcoins) - I think we can judge by looking at prominent and long-term Bitcoin regulars and it was pretty clear that bip110 is the vast minority

  3. amount of fully validating nodes (optionally: with any Bitcoins in their wallets) - same as above point 2, seemed low judging by discussions among general Bitcoin groups?

  4. amount of people overall (who are using Bitcoin) - same as point 2, seemed low

I do not understand why project was not stopped, after for long time of optional-signalling it was clear the support is not there, and while there was no general consensus among Bitcoiners (by various metrics) for that change. Why was it so?

reddit.com
u/metalzip — 9 days ago

Announcement regarding the future of r/BitcoinKnots

As the founder of this community, I wanted to share a personal update and clarify my stance on the recent developments surrounding BIP-110 and the direction of the project.

Historically, my support for Bitcoin Knots was based on its approach to enforcing stricter node policies, not fundamentally altering consensus rules. That policy-focused approach was the core vision of Knots prior to BIP-110. Now that BIP-110 has failed to gain traction, Luke Dashjr appears to be moving toward a distinct forkcoin, a path I personally do not agree with or support.

Because of this shift in direction, I will be stepping back from my active role here. I will no longer be routinely posting or moderating the subreddit, though I may check in from time to time.

This community remains open for everyone. You are all completely free to continue discussing BIP-110, potential forks, or any other related topics here as you see fit. However, given the latest course of action, I can no longer actively guide or manage the group.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed to the discussions here over the years.

reddit.com
u/blockdyor_andrea — 10 days ago
▲ 25 r/BitcoinKnots+1 crossposts

20,000 Knots Nodes

BIP-110 crashed and burned. But look on the bright side - we now have >20,000 Knots node runners or 15-20% of the network. Last year it was like what, 2%? And my feeling going in and coming out of this debacle is the vast majority are not going anywhere.

Hold the line and let’s keep Core in check and keep Bitcoin money. It’s a dark day, but dust it off. There’s plenty of work to do.

reddit.com
u/BitcoinDove — 12 days ago

DISK SPACE JUMPED AFTER REINDEXING THE FULL BLOCKCHAIN

Before the BIP-110 trilemma today, I went ahead and reindexed my entire blockchain. I am running Knots 29.3.knots20260508 - which is the latest version as of this posting. I am on Ubuntu, with a separate drive and my disc space jumped from 780GB to 895GB, My question is if there are any redundant or unnecessary files that can be deleted to recover more space? A detailed explanation of the folder structure for bitcoin nodes would be appreciated.

u/H8ckt1v1st — 12 days ago

Block 961,634 Mined via OCEAN's DATUM; BIP-110 Chain Fails Behind Work Lead—Knots Needs to Return to Filter Policies

Simple Mining (@simpleminingio) has mined block 961,634 using OCEAN’s DATUM protocol.

This block extended the Bitcoin main chain without signaling support for BIP-110 consensus rules. With the non-signaling main chain now more than 7 blocks ahead in total proof-of-work, the BIP-110 attempt is effectively a failed chain.

While members of the OCEAN team personally favor BIP-110, their DATUM protocol granted full agency back to individual miners, enabling their customers to construct templates and choose their own signaling rules. Giving miners choice rather than enforcing pool-wide mandates is a massive step forward for pool decentralization and deserves serious recognition.

Given that BIP-110 lacks the hash rate consensus to survive, future releases of Bitcoin Knots must move past this proposal. Development should focus on delivering updated versions without BIP-110 consensus changes, retaining Knots' core strength—robust, user-configurable mempool and policy filters—rather than introducing contentious consensus rule shifts.

u/blockdyor_andrea — 12 days ago