Jobs
After graduating with my master in IO WORK is finding a job hard ?? Because I hear a lot of people say finding a job with a I/opsychology degree is hard. I live in Texas Houston to be specific and I just want to know why’s I’m getting into too
After graduating with my master in IO WORK is finding a job hard ?? Because I hear a lot of people say finding a job with a I/opsychology degree is hard. I live in Texas Houston to be specific and I just want to know why’s I’m getting into too
Seriously asking.
The validity evidence is about as solid as it gets in applied psych. Consistent questions, behavioural anchors, standardised scoring. Schmidt and Hunter basically settled this decades ago. Adverse impact is better than most alternatives. It scales fine.
And yet most companies I've ever encountered just let hiring managers ask whatever comes to mind and then argue about vibes in the debrief.
I've gone back and forth on why this keeps happening. Is it that nobody trains hiring managers on any of this? Is it that building a proper competency framework feels like a big project and the role needs filling this week? Or do people just genuinely trust their gut more than a rubric, even when all the evidence says they shouldn't?
My honest guess is it's not really a knowledge gap anymore. Most TA leaders know the research. It's more that nobody's figured out how to make it easy enough that a busy hiring manager actually does it under pressure.
Anyway. Has anyone here actually cracked this in practice or are we still having the same conversation we were 20 years ago?
Hi Everyone,
Some have reached out to me asking for examples of the kind of IO research that I find so concerning. There are, of course, many candidate papers but I thought I'd offer one that I just came across today. It's an older paper (published in 2010) but has been very widely cited with well over 2,000 citations according to google scholar. For those interested they can take a look at the paper, comment on what they see, and I will return in a day or two to offer my thoughts.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
An open access version of the paper is found here:
https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=psychfacpub
Hello everyone,
I am currently planning on obtaining my MS in IO Psychology, and I am in the planning stages of refining my career path/goal. I have been exploring 2 options: Consultant and Executive Coaching. I'm still a bit unclear on which one more aligns with what I want to achieve, which ultimately is entrepreneurship, and having the capabilities to establish my own contracts, schedule, and employment freedom. I know it will be a journey, but I want to hear from those who have followed the path of obtaining the degree and what a work week is like in the career fields. I have several additional questions below:
Please feel free to elaborate and share any stories or scenarios that you have that even made you question whether or not it was right for you. I am also open to hearing from those who may have taken the unconventional route to get into the career.
Also, if you want to share more info with me directly, let me know! Please keep all responses respectful and genuine!
Hi all!
I'm looking for some book suggestions (preferably not textbooks). I'm starting my PhD in I/O psych next semester but my undergrad psych dept did not have any I/Os so I'm feeling a bit underprepared.
I'm mainly interested in task/ job analysis, technology and personality at work. Doing a simple search revealed an overwhelming number of books so I'm reaching out to see what the community suggests.
Thank you so much for your help!!