r/LAClippers

▲ 2.3k r/LAClippers+1 crossposts

[Amin] On NBA denial of ESPN article: It probably did contain significant inaccuracies. Based on our reporting (Pablo Torre Finds Out) I found it hard to believe. I thought, this sounds like the Clippers. We've been reporting since September, the NBA has never come out with a statement like that

streamable.com
u/-Kerby — 6 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 13.2k r/LAClippers+9 crossposts

[Holmes and Charania] The NBA has found no evidence showing LA Clippers owner Steve Ballmer funneled money through team sponsors to pay Kawhi Leonard in order to circumvent the salary cap, sources tell ESPN.

Source: https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/49639157/nba-la-clippers-aspiration-investigation-steve-ballmer-kawhi-leonard

The NBA has found no evidence showing LA Clippers owner Steve Ballmer funneled money through team sponsors to pay Kawhi Leonard in order to circumvent the salary cap, according to three people with knowledge of discussions between the two sides in recent days.

Instead, the NBA is focused on whether the team's introduction of Leonard to team sponsors constitutes a violation of the league's rules prohibiting salary cap circumvention, two of the sources said. The league is examining whether the Clippers are guilty of "failure to supervise" employees, though it's unclear what specific rule the team would have violated or what the penalties would be, two of the sources said.

Two sources with direct knowledge of the situation said Leonard has maintained to the NBPA, league and Wachtell Lipton that he had no involvement in salary cap circumvention, and so far conversations around potential consequences have centered on him paying restitution for potential improper benefits from the Clippers, such as travel and lodging, for his representative and uncle Dennis Robertson.

If the case goes to arbitration, the arbitrator could compel document production, witness testimony and order discovery. After a hearing, the arbitrator's ruling would be subject to an appeals panel made up of three people jointly appointed by the NBA and NBPA. The appeal panel decision is binding. Only after that process could Silver be authorized to issue any potential punishment.

u/Competitive_Wear_408 — 2 days ago
▲ 3.0k r/LAClippers+1 crossposts

[Amick] An ESPN spokesman sent this statement to The Athletic: “We stand by our reporting, which included numerous attempts by ESPN to get comment from the NBA.”

An ESPN spokesman sent this statement to @TheAthletic: “We stand by our reporting, which included numerous attempts by ESPN to get comment from the NBA.”

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/author/sam-amick/

u/Odd-Direction9452 — 2 days ago

With the signing of Bradley Beal, is Mathurin gone?

According to Spotrac, we have 15 contracts plus 3 two-ways. We don't have any room. If we get Watson, players will go out in a trade. I don't see any room for Mathurin.

reddit.com
u/Constant-Bridge3690 — 1 day ago
▲ 3.1k r/LAClippers+1 crossposts

[Murray] The NBA has released a statement as well this morning (regarding ESPN story on Kawhi Leonard and Clippers)

bsky.app
u/Austin63867 — 2 days ago

Why do people believe Pablo but not Wachtell?

I've seen some Clippers fans still assume the Clippers are going to "get away" with cap circumvention.

Wachtell has spent 11 months talking to people Pablo doesn't have access to. Including Joe Sanberg himself. They investigated deals that Pablo hasn't reported on. They have no podcast to promote. They have no incentive to discard details that don't fit their narrative.

People will say "Pablo won a Pulitzer!" but that's just an appeal to outside authority. I can do that too: Wachtell is one of the most prestigious law firms in the world. They have been around longer than Pablo has been alive.

If Wachtell had found evidence, would people question the investigation? Or is it only because they didn't come to the result that matched their under-informed opinion? (We're all under-informed compared to the people that did the investigation.)

reddit.com
u/OtherwiseAddled — 2 days ago

Clippers Talk Exposes Episode 13 Hoax

Ausland is only scratching the surface. The false narrative of episode 13 allows Torre to present the Clippers employee as his second source. The first source, the Intuit Dome contractor, claimed there was a secret cap circumvention deal between Leonard and Daktronics. The second source said they knew about the deal with Daktronics, and Torre made it seem like that source was confirming the secret deal.

Except it wasn’t a secret, as we learned from the emails in episode 14. Without the false narrative, Torre couldn’t use the second source to confirm the first source’s account.

When you look at both episodes together and remove the false narrative, there’s only one person claiming cap circumvention: the Intuit Dome contractor. One source, pure hearsay, and he reached out to Torre after the first episode aired.

A false narrative covering up a false lead.

youtube.com
u/drewmanshow — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/LAClippers+1 crossposts

Ty Lawson: "So does Pablo Torre get any fine , backlash, sued or fired for Trying to ruin people’s reputation/ life or Pablo can just say oops my bad and sweep it under the rug 🧐🤔🧐🤔 smh"

Ty Lawson going in on Pablo. He was recently arrested around a month ago for shoplifting some alcohol.

Source

u/JoeBiden2020FTW — 2 days ago

The funny thing about all of this is that we had ZERO cap benefits even if the allegations were true. Kawhi was signed to a max contract every year lol

reddit.com
u/cenafan44 — 2 days ago

Is anyone else creeped out by him and his fans? It’s interesting how mad they all are. They should be relieved there was no cap circumvention.

There was no cap circumcision

u/InevitableAd2436 — 2 days ago