r/MJAllegations

This has been bugging me for the past few days. I understand that this is some unknown persons claims, but I was wondering if there is any way this actually could've taken place and been unknown.

Growing up my mom never played Michael Jackson in our house and I never understood why until I was older. Her best friend's stepson spent time around him as a child and the family says he was sexually abused. A nonprofit connected to their family had reached out asking if he would contribute a song to a charity album supporting music programs for kids, and he agreed. They were blown away a global celebrity would notice them. That's actually how grooming often works. It doesn't start with harm. It starts with trust. He built trust not only with the child but also with the parents so they felt safe allowing access. The family pursued legal action and the case was resolved and closed through a settlement. People always ask why families settle, but going up against a celebrity isn't just a legal battle, it's public opinion, fans, media, and a person people feel emotionally connected to. Our brains form familiarity with celebrities because we grow up hearing their music and seeing them everywhere, so it feels like we know them. That familiarity can make people defend the celebrity before listening to the people who say they were hurt. Other men have also shared similar alleged experiences, including Wade Robson and James Safechuck. I'm not telling you how to feel bout the music. I'm asking you to understand why survivors are often dismissed and why families sometimes stay quiet. Abuse by powerful people often looks like kindness first. Please listen before immediately protecting.

Could he really have privately settled and have it not been discovered through investigation? I am not familiar with laws and everything around settlements, so I didn't know if this was a possibility. Also, wouldn't there be/is their record of him contributing a song to a charity album? It isn't here but she says this took place at Neverland which leaves a relatively small window of time, somewhere between 1988-1992/3.

i’m obsessed with michael rn and i love him so much, but maybe you can put my unanswered questions at rest. i feel like the people that were around him when he was alive are so fake and keep tarnishing his image with so much ease. my questions would be: did he give alcohol to minors? i’ve read somewhere about aaron carter (who kept defending him) that michael offered him alcohol and drugs when he was 15. also, corey feldman (who kept defending him in the past) came with the statement in the 2000s that michael showed him pornography when he was a teen. it keeps confusing me when i hear someone who is allegedly on michael’s side telling these stories. what do you think about this? were they trying to attract press like all of them? are they credible? who the f was a real friend to michael?

To start this off, I've always thought Michael was innocent for many reasons, but I've spent time reading the r/ LeavingNeverlandHBO, and I'm now feeling confused. I've always believed he was fully innocent, but am now feeling conflicted after reading through it and seeing others' opinions on the documentary, which I've always seen as a lie/money-grab

I'm curious about the case and wonder if anyone else could tell me the main reasons why they support him and what they think proves his innocence/most clearly disproves claims that he's a "pdf" -- I just want to feel more educated on the topic and sure of my opinion

This video debunks a majority of the lies against Michael jackson, When the video got to the medias coverage of the 2005 case it made me so angry many people dont even realize that the stuff they are saying comes from the misinformation the media propagated about the case and how it was unfolding the medias clear bias towards the prosecution reminded me of the menendez case but way worse and the effects of the medias lies are still evident today people are constantly using arguments that aren't true arguments that the media propagated. But the video covers way more than just the trial and the medias bias like the racist origins of wacko jacko. it's a really good watch but I reccomend watching it in segments cause it is a lot of information to digest and if you don't like the Ai voice they uploaded a real voiceover aswell.

Not that I believe it of course, its just that ive seen some of the sick suggestions said by guilters and I want to debunk them in future conversation.

Why does Lauren Weis claim that Jordan's description matched the photos they took? A few others on. the side of the prosecution have also claimed in recent years that it matched, and Carl Douglas referred to it as the "300lb gorilla in the room". Why didn't that result in an arrest if it matched? Additionally, why wasn't it used then in the trial? Also, were the photos used as evidence during the 1994 gran jury hearings?

https://preview.redd.it/rcxu8jyomj1h1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=10a93ef7271132a72e5629b733c3e94769a411e5

Does anyone have more information on what this document is and if it is true? I recently saw a post of someone using this as proof he had paid off other families and I had never seen it before.

Serious question, if these "so-called" accusations against Michael Jackson are true, doesnt part of the blame belong on the parents? They were fully aware of the accusations against MJ in 1993 and continued to keep him around their own children when it is their obligation to not endanger their kids right? So why don't the family sue their parents for negligence or child endangerment? Also, if they wrote books defending MJ, did countless interviews defending MJ and under oath at his criminal trial claimed he never did anything inappropriate, why do they not face perjury charges today since now they claim those statements in a court of law were false?

¿A alguien más le sucede esto? A veces me angustio mucho intentando encontrar respuesta para todo.

Creo en la inocencia de MJ, pero me angustia no poder hallar respuestas para ciertas cosas como el caso de Jane Doe, los recibos de supuestos pagos, los cabos sueltos, Terry George... sé que hay una ligera explicación para cada uno de estos puntos, pero algunos son muy confusos o imposibles de verificar. Y confieso que he tenido momentos de duda en los que he dicho "¿y si fuera cierto?", porque soy humana, y dudar no es malo.

Sigo creyendo en la inocencia de MJ pero realmente tengo envidia de los fans de otros artistas que no tienen que lidiar con todas estas cosas.

Disculpen este post. No tengo con quién descargarme por este sentimiento.

Hey guys I know yall will be more informed on this topic.. and I can’t find much good info online elsewhere. But can someone give me context about the picture of babies both in his bedroom and the couple of hotel examples I found.

Was that ever brought up with him? Or in one of the cases? Only things I’ve found on both sides of the Michael discourse is “yea not sure about that, it’s just strange”

Can someone fully explain the Cascio family situation to me? I have seen so many differing accounts floating around. For example, I saw someone say that the estate approached the Cascios in 2020. Why would they approach them and offer to give them money? I also read somewhere that the Cascios only agreed to meet in swimsuits so they couldn't be taped, is this true?