r/ParkerGetAJob

Conversation about types of people in the political discouse with Destiny.

Conversation about types of people in the political discouse with Destiny.

Link: https://youtu.be/2OG8aGYEqaQ?si=Pf0NGtSx-MxLJ0Ba

This is a conversation Destiny had on how to label different types/levels of people and their attitude/level of awareness of the kind of movement they are supporting.

I am not a Destiny fan.But I think this conversation makes a lot of sense. Destiny has been a streamer for over a decade.He is really knowledgable on how a movement spreads.How to combat your haters.How to use your Fandom to spread your vision of the world.

I think creators should not become audience captured and only say things they think their audience want to hear.If Dean genuinely cares about the political discourse then he will be carefull with his words so that they cant be used by haters/opponents/Trump supporters why cutting a clip in a bad faith manner.If his fanbase is harrasing people he should put very strict red lines on what people on the chat cant do(not in a non chalatant/joking manner but seriously).Maybe he should ban people who send death threats and fake rape accusations to the people he is debating with.

If he is constantly body shaming right wing men then his audience will think it is acceptable behaviour.If Dean is being misogynistic or racist to people if they are Trump supporters then his fanbase will think it is okay to be misogynistic or racist to people as long as they are on the right or not progressive enough.

u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 18 hours ago

Parker please post your debate with Jesusandwhatnot on your channel.

Parker should post the debate on his channel(You Tube and Tiktok both) so everyone can see the reaction of his audience on the debate.I think the debate should be posted as soon as possible so the narrative of Jesusandwhatnot's audience does not dominate the opinion on how the debate went.His fans are "Trad Catholics" and they will try very hard to defend him.As you are debating about their faith.

Parker should watch his debate with other atheists and get an idea on the types of arguments he has used with other Atheists.He mostly debates protestants.He is not used to debating Athiest all that much.But he uses a lot Saint Aquinas' arguments.Parker should write his opening statements and provide positive arguments in favour of Atheism.Noah might also talk about "scientifically proven" miracles as he did in his debate with another Athiest.

Parkergetajob please be prepared for the debate as he has a big Trad Catholic or Trad Christian audience.He doesn't believe in gay marriage.He thinks gay people should be celibate for the rest of their lives.He hates progressive protestant churches.He converted to Catholism because it has objective morality,dogma of the church and church fathers have reconciled a lot of contradictions in the Bible.

Parker you need to study some important things that Catholics believe in.Please represent the Athiest and Agnostic side well on the Debate.And please post the debate on your channel as soon as possible.Dont make the mistake that Dean made by not posting separately the debate between him and Noah as a video.His audience was able to completely dominate the opinion on how the Debate went.

All the best🫡.May the best man win.

u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 2 days ago

Dean please upload a video on You Tube debunking the allegations.

Dean please post short and long form videos on You Tube debunking the false allegations.It will help your You Tube audience to debunk the allegation better .Ask Parker to post a video debunking the allegation.Ask all your friends to cover the topic dubunking the allegations as soon as possible.

Please stay safe Dean.

reddit.com
u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 2 days ago

Dean should upload a video debunking the allegations.

I think making a false rape accusation is one the worst thing somebody can do.I want Dean to take it very seriously especially because his job depends on his reputation.He should upload a video summarizing the entire situation and debunk it thoroughly.Try to make it viral so that even the maga people who dont know the full story have to confront the evidence of how fake the allegations are.The statements made by Emily are super important.Reasons why a pro life debate guy might want to sabotage him??

Most people don't watch his 4 hour live stream.Maybe he should also post short form content from the streams when he is addressing the allegations.I think once people see the evidence most people would believe him.The video needs to be detailed and well done.Maybe even add some clips from the streams.

Dean please make a official scripted video addressing the situation.I understand you are not doing well mentally.But I think it is the best way to clear your name.Your audience who watches you daily already believes you.The video is for people who only know you through some viral clips.

Dean you deserve all the love in the world.Nobody deserves what you went through.I wish you find peace and happiness 😊.

reddit.com
u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 4 days ago
▲ 44 r/ParkerGetAJob+1 crossposts

This is such a good read. Please consider taking the time to read it.

 credit: Christian Oritz via FB

Oye, mira.

White people. Come here please. You always say “Well no one taught us about these things so where do I go to learn?” Save this post. Share it. I’m going to offer you a gift that I don’t do often. So, listen up.

I’m a Decolonial Social Scientist who studies the world before, during, and after European colonization. My work is about connecting the dots so people can see how those systems were built, how they spread, and how they still show up in society today.

I want 🫵🏽YOU🫵🏽 to share this so your friends and family can learn something today. I’m not in the business of convincing people of things they’re not ready to hear or accept. That’s a fool’s game. I’m here to plant seeds. History is complicated, but the receipts are there. What I’m about to say can be traced through historical documents, laws, policies, institutions, and the systems colonizers built.

Colonizers didn’t just take land. They colonized bodies, minds, culture, family structures, sexuality, labor, religion, education, and law. They created racial categories and built systems around them. They also institutionalized patriarchy, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, and other forms of control that helped conquest survive long after the original invasion.

Today’s lesson?

All white people are racist, but not all white people are bigots.

To understand that, you first have to understand that race isn’t biology. There’s no white gene, Black gene, or biological line dividing humanity into the racial categories we use today. Race was created by people. It was used to classify human beings, organize power, justify conquest and enslavement, control land and labor, and decide who got rights, wealth, protection, citizenship, and opportunity.

Nobody is born biologically white in the political meaning of whiteness, and nobody is born biologically racist. We’re born into a world where racial categories and racial hierarchy already exist. We inherit them. And, often times, we are conditioned to act on them.

Whiteness isn’t written into DNA. It’s a social and political position created by a racial system. Over time, different European ethnic groups were absorbed into the category of white and given access to rights and protections that were denied to Black, Indigenous, and other colonized peoples. The fact that the boundaries of whiteness have changed throughout history tells you exactly what race is: a political classification, not a biological truth. Don’t believe me? This is why so many of you say “Well my great grandfather was Italian or Irish and experienced racism when they came here!” And you’re correct. But you don’t ask why don’t Italians or Irish face the same wretched racism they did back then. They were assimilated into whiteness by laws to expand the hierarchy of “whiteness.”

So when I say all white people are racist, I’m not saying every white person is evil, hates Black people, or was born with racism in their blood. That would make racism biological, and it isn’t.

Racism is something we inherit through systems.

We’re born into, and conditioned by laws, schools, neighborhoods, economies, workplaces, media, policing, property systems, and cultural norms that were shaped by racial hierarchy before any of us got here. White people inherit a position in that system that was built to advantage whiteness. Black, Brown, Indigenous, Asian, queer, disabled, people of the global majority inherit different forms of exclusion, exploitation, dispossession, surveillance, and control created by that same Western Eurocentric system.

That’s why a white person can genuinely love Black people and still be racist. They can have Black friends, marry a Black person, raise Black children, hate racial slurs, and despise racial violence. None of that automatically removes them from the system they inherited.

Racism is about how power gets organized through race. It shapes who has historically controlled land, wealth, housing, education, employment, political authority, policing, citizenship, media, and institutions. It created advantages for people classified as white while creating barriers for people classified outside of whiteness.

Saying “I didn’t create it” doesn’t make someone separate from it. None of us alive today invented the racial categories we were handed. We inherited the laws, institutions, wealth patterns, neighborhoods, stereotypes, conditioning, and unequal distribution of power that came with them.

The real question is what you do once you understand that.

Do you call yourself one of the good white people and stop there, or do you confront the system that created whiteness and the advantages attached to it? Being kind to Black people doesn’t abolish racial hierarchy. Loving Black people doesn’t redistribute wealth or power. Having Black friends doesn’t undo generations of dispossession.

Race was constructed. Racism was constructed. Whiteness was constructed. And because human beings built these systems, human beings can dismantle them. We just can’t dismantle racism while pretending it’s only about whether somebody has hate in their heart.

So what would sacrificing whiteness actually look like?

It would mean refusing the benefits, behaviors, protections, and concentrations of power that whiteness offers when you have the ability to interrupt them. And that has to become material. Accountability should focus on concrete behaviors and institutional routines that reproduce racial hierarchy and on redistributing power.

Imagine a white executive who realizes every person with real decision-making authority in their organization is white. Sacrificing whiteness isn’t posting about racism. It’s changing who actually holds authority, including when that means they no longer control every decision themselves.

Imagine someone inherits substantial wealth produced through generations of property ownership in a society where Black families were systematically blocked from the same wealth-building opportunities. Sacrificing whiteness means asking what repair and redistribution require of that inheritance, rather than treating everything legally inherited as morally disconnected from history.

For a landlord, developer, university, foundation, or corporation, it could mean giving up some control over land, capital, governance, hiring, procurement, admissions, or investment decisions and transferring meaningful authority and resources to communities historically dispossessed by those systems.

For an ordinary worker racialized as white without enormous wealth, the scale is different. Nobody needs to impoverish themselves as some sort of racial penance. That would turn structural transformation into individual self-punishment.

They can refuse whiteness where it operates around them: refusing the racial networking advantage that gets someone hired through “who you know,” challenging discriminatory decisions even when silence would benefit their career, supporting policies that materially redistribute opportunity, refusing to become the automatically presumed authority in interracial spaces, organizing against unequal workplace practices, and putting actual time, money, relationships, and political power behind structural change.

And there’s another dimension people rarely discuss: social protection.

Whiteness often provides the ability to remain silent without that silence being interpreted as political. So sacrificing whiteness can mean spending some of that protection. Speaking when speaking threatens your promotion. Challenging your family when silence would preserve harmony. Refusing to let a Black colleague absorb retaliation alone. Becoming the person who puts their name on the complaint when everyone knows the Black employee will be punished more severely for making it.

That’s sacrifice because something is actually at stake. How will you break the cycle?

#racism #progressives #DSA #whitepeople #race #racism #criticalracetheory #decoloniality #antiracism #activist #oyemira #zacatecho

reddit.com
u/Foreign_Librarian193 — 9 days ago

What is different between Adam Mockler & Luke Beasley to Parker & Dean

I'm unsure if all 4 of these had collaborated or met IRL in some Gen Z liberal group to counter-counterattack Gen Z far-right extremism (like your Nick Fuentes, Kai what's his name, Tyler Russell, etc)

reddit.com
u/El_Dorado_Tx — 9 days ago

Does Anyone Know This Coolguy11 (Allegedly Undergrad) Debater?

I recently came across these videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWCkqc81rSI&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbKyxhM1cfk&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_lgv9iTlK0

After watching them, I'm trying to understand something about Coolguy11 that I feel like I'm missing.

In the first recording, Dean Withers was trying to have a political discussion with Coolguy, but Coolguy seemed much more interested in joking around and ragebaiting. The discussion ended up becoming largely semantic. Dean made two claims concerning whether MAGA was the best political theory, and Coolguy shifted the discussion toward whether those claims were actually identical.

I do think Coolguy had a legitimate philosophical point here. There is a difference between:

  • Identity: “MAGA is the best political theory” means the same thing as “Trump is the best president.”
  • Entailment: Saying “MAGA is the best political theory” commits you to saying “Trump is the best president.”

However, I also got the impression that Coolguy was deliberately being provocative and wasn't engaging in good faith. At the end of the recording, he even seemed to treat the interaction primarily as a way of gaining followers.

What confuses me is the later change in how Dean talks about him.

In the second recording, during Dean's debate with jesus.and.whatnot, the discussion became a chaotic argument about abortion, with a lot of interruptions and cross-talk. At one point, Coolguy11 joined the stream and attempted to identify what he believed was a mistake in JAW's argument. This eventually became part of the broader dispute over whether Dean needed outside assistance, AI scripts, etc.

Then, in the third recording, Dean appears to speak extremely highly of Coolguy. At around 1:12, he calls him “the best debater that's ever existed.” Obviously, that could be hyperbole, but Dean seems to praise his debating ability consistently throughout these interactions.

That's what I'm trying to understand lol!

The first recording and the later recordings were apparently only separated by a few months, yet Dean's attitude seems to have changed from treating Coolguy as an idiot/troll to treating him as an exceptionally capable debater.

So what exactly is Coolguy11 good at?

Is there some particular philosophical or debating skill that I'm not recognizing? Does anyone have some of his debates? I'm curious since Dean doesn't really act like this over anyone (other than maybe ProphetDivinityy)..

Or is there something else about his debating style that makes him unusually difficult to debate?

I'm aware that he's a relatively young philosophy undergraduate, so I'm not expecting him to have some enormous academic record. What I'm interested in is what specifically makes experienced debaters like Dean rate him so highly.

If anyone here is familiar with Coolguy's other debates, philosophical writing, arguments, or discussions, I'd especially appreciate being pointed toward them. Are there particular debates, papers, posts, or arguments where his ability is especially apparent? I'd rather look at examples of his actual work than just hear that he's a good or bad debater.

I asked here on the Parker reddit because he is relevant to what I'm saying and I assume people in this community may have more familiarity with the philosophical ideas, literature, and debate techniques that these individuals engage with. From an outside perspective, a lot of his appearances seem focused on technicalities, semantics, and optics rather than straightforward good-faith discussion, so I'm wondering whether there's a substantive ability underneath that style that I'm not seeing.

u/Trick-Structure1432 — 8 days ago

Dean and Eli

Does anybody know what happened between Dean and Eli? I saw Eli doing a live about Dean and Parker and I thought they used to be friends. It made me realize Eli hasn’t been on their lives in a while.

reddit.com
u/Advanced-Guidance-27 — 9 days ago

Dean doesn’t have a stutter.

I will probably get hate for this but I think Dean is lying about having a stutter. Everyone stumbles on their words from time to time and I think he just says he has a stutter so it’s less embarrassing when he does it in front of thousands of people. 🤷‍♀️ Doesn’t seem genuine to me tbh.

reddit.com
u/No-View4684 — 11 days ago

Women are getting reactionary.

Not all women are feminist and not all feminist are well versed in what the feminist position is on a topic.Due to the rise of the mansophere,incels and the alt right,women have started hating misogynist men and use the word men as a synonym for misogynist men sometimes.

Feminism doesn't believe in body shaming anybody[why would you make fun of someone for their height when it is something for the most part out of their control?].Feminist don't believe that men who have a girlfriend are more valuable than men who do not.Feminist use the word incel as a synonym for a misogynist.As the incel forums are extremely misogynistic.Feminist never use the word single as an insult.Feminist care about the loneliness epidemic.Feminist just don't like it when men make the loneliness crisis a not getting laid crisis and blame women for the problem.Women actually want to be friends with men if they are classmates or share a common hobby.Feminist want to encourage men to have good friendships with other men.

Feminism doesn't hate men.It hates the system of patriachy.Feminist know that we cannot just blame a systematic problem on individual teenage boys.Feminist are critical of the patriachy and dont hate men.Feminist believe that socialisation plays a very important role in how men and women behave. Feminist also dont want women with internalized misogyny to uphold the system of patriachy either.Patriachy truly only benefits the men at the very top.Patriachy says women are too weak to fight wars.So we must only draft men on the basis of their gender alone.Feminism says abolish the draft.It says if abolishing the draft is not possible then draft both men and women.Give roles to people on the basis of their capability.Modern militaries require various roles like on sight hospitals,chefs and strategist.Feminist say that ideally there should be no gendered expectation that men have to pay on the first date.Today men on average earn more and socialisation leads to this expectation being placed on men.Feminist women are more likely to believe in spilting the bill compared to conservative women and men.

We need to give both men and women paid maternity and paternity leave for nine months which is compulsory to take after the couple decides to have a kid.It will help manage the increase in the wage gap in women after 30.As it will give a woman time to take care of herself and heal.The father will have the opportunity to spend time with his kids and help the mom in her healing journey.It will also account for the loss in promotion ability and experience time faced by women.Then it will make having kids more attractive and fair to women who desire to have kids.Rules for not firing parents immediately by brutal capatalist are needed.We need to give constructin workers and childcare workers better wages as they are necessary for society and not properly compensated in society.We want men to join the fight for emancipation of people from the patriachy because it is the ethical thing to do and not only if it personally benefits them in some way.Just like we want white people and all people for that matter to join the fight against white supremacy and towards the flourishment of human beings.

Feminist sometimes ignore male sexual violence victims and male objectification.I know it is an issue that affects women more due to the historical and current oppression women face.But we must try our very best to help all victims and we are fighting against all exploitation.We also need to talk about how men are raped in prisons.A lot of crime is due to poverty.The prison system unfairly punishes people instead of solving the underlying condition which leads to crime in the first place.

Btw I don't want people to attack me by calling me an angry incel man.I am a feminist and a woman.

Liberal feminism/choice feminism/white feminism which average 18 year old woman knows about often misses important nuances and social media promotes provocative content. Feminism needs to be as intersectional as possible.We need to care about working class men,black men,trans men,disable men,young unemployed men,trans women,cis women,black women and people suffering in third world countries due to the aftermath of colonization and imperialism etc.

Instead of saying men oppressed and are oppressing women.We should say patriarchy oppressed and is oppressing women particularly but it also opresses men in different ways.As the patriachy believes in prescribed and strict gender roles which it claims is either grounded in religion,natural hierarchy necessary for a stable society or the innate biology [it says women are too weak and thus we need to control women to "protect" them.]

reddit.com
u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 10 days ago

How some women use the term "men".

Women use the word men as a synonym for misogynist men.When women make bad generalized statements about men they are most of the time are talking about Trump supporters,incels and misogynists.

Women are not talking about feminist and democratic men.They are not talking about their male friends or favorite men on the internet.

Bad man=Trump supporter=doesn't care about my rights=rape apologist=wife beater=misogynist.

Women in the 2010s used to believe that men are cool [non chalant]because they play video games,love anime,dont care about looks and grades.Women had a lot of internalized misogyny.They wanted to be the girl who was one the guys,wanted to spilt the bill in half,wanted to play sports with men,hated chivalry (it treated women differently)and wanted to prove to the world that girls and boys are exactly the same by becoming as much boyish[cool] as possible.Women thought barbies and makeup are the most cringe and fake shit ever.It is associated with third wave feminism which is very sex positive and pro hook up culture.

Fourth wave feminism focuse more on women embracing theirs feminity[some women now think that all men think like myron ganes and so it is better to be single and have female friends.Women should not get married as they will have to do more unpaid labour at home and go through pregnancy and child birth.A child will lead to more increase in the wage gape and there is a possibility of sexual abuse.]

The things girls thought were cool are now associated with misogyny due to the rise of the manosphere and dating advice podcasts.Now women associate gym bros,crpyto bros with the right.Now women sometimes think all young men are just Andrew tate and Andrew wilson fanboys .Now feminist have even started hating men talking about the draft which feminist believe should be abolished as it is mostly brought up by misogynist men to dunk on feminism.Many men are talking about repealing the 19 th Amendment.These men not realising that the draft being only for men is the result of patriarchal standards for men and a conservative position.

Some conservative women have a very bioessetinalist view of men and think "boys will be boys".So weird jokes are fine because it is their nature and so not surprising at all.

reddit.com
u/Horror_Nectarine_327 — 12 days ago