r/RoastMyIdea

Netsight is a network scanner and security toolkit I built solo in Swift 6 / SwiftUI, targeting iOS 26. It does live LAN scanning, device fingerprinting (OUI/DNS/HTTP), a force-directed topology map, on-device AI analysis via Apple Foundation Models, and CVE lookups against the NVD database.

Happy to answer anything about the architecture or the security tooling.

Download it here: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/netsight-wifi-tools/id6775736000

Started two years ago with the idea, built something else, then came back to this:

https://facilist.org/

Take a picture of something that needs explaining, immediately record audio while telling about the item. List is created automatically with text transcription. List can be privately shared and items checked off.

I've gotten feedback from family and friends but I want some real feedback from people who don't know me. I find the tool very useful but I don't have a need to use it everyday.

Any feedback, negative or positive is appreciated.

Yes, I certainly used AI to help make it. I'm not a software engineer, but I work with a bunch of them everyday.

Hey everyone! I've been working on this for a while and finally launched it today, so excited (and a little nervous) to share it here.

It's called Mull — a free Chrome extension that sits on 40+ shopping and travel sites. When you're about to check out and click add to cart, a popup appears, gently pauses you and connects the purchase to a financial goal you're saving toward. You get three options: skip it and save the money toward your goal, "mull it over" (get a reminder in 24 hours), or just go ahead and buy — no guilt, no lockout, totally your call.

You can track multiple goals at once, star one as your current "Focus," build up a little savings pool from the purchases you skip, and if you want to go deeper, there's an optional budget layer that shows you a guilt-free spending number (income − needs − what you're putting toward goals).

I know "free browser extension" can set off scam alarms, so I want to be upfront: Mull runs 100% on your device. No server, no account, no login — your goals and spending never leave your browser, because there's nowhere for them to go. It only reads the product name and price on the checkout page so it can show you the reminder, and that's it. It's on the official Chrome Web Store, not a sideloaded file, so it's passed Google's review.

No affiliate links and no monetization right now — I'm just trying to build something useful before I ever think about revenue. And if it's not for you, uninstalling takes two seconds.2

Site: trymull.com ·
We also launched on Product Hunt: https://www.producthunt.com/products/mull-think-before-you-buy?utm_source=other&utm_medium=social

This is good. I’d make it slightly cleaner and less “feature list”-heavy:
Title: I built a tool that turns meeting transcripts into data architecture diagrams
Built a tool called MeetingSketch: https://meetingsketch.com
It takes a meeting transcript and turns the technical discussion into usable outputs like data architecture diagrams, meeting insights, project notes, action items, and next steps.
I built it because a lot of architecture and system design context gets discussed verbally in meetings, but someone still has to manually turn that conversation into diagrams and documentation afterward.
Right now, I’m testing it with people who sit in technical or customer meetings and need to document what was discussed.

Would love to hear some feedback!

’ve been exploring a digital trust problem: sometimes an email, SMS, WhatsApp message, recruiter message, or payment request looks completely legitimate, but you still don’t know whether to trust it.

I built a very early MVP with Lovable to test the concept:

https://verify.trustairesearch.com/

I’d really appreciate feedback from fellow vibe coders on:

• Is the flow immediately understandable?
• Would you actually use this when a message feels suspicious?
• What feels unnecessary or confusing?
• What would make the result more credible?
• What would you build differently?

This is still an experiment, so please don’t submit passwords, OTPs, banking credentials, SSNs, or other sensitive information.

Feel free to roast the UX, product idea, or implementation — useful criticism is exactly what I’m looking for.

I built The Boardroom. You paste in a piece of work, five critics argue about it, and you give you honest feedback. First answer is free, no signup. $29 once for 100 after that.

This isn't for AI super users. But I've shared it with about 20 people, and no one has even tried it. One person shared good feedback, one of them was that he isn't the demo for this.

Not one person ran a answer. My friends were too nice to tell me why, which is the exact thing the product claims to fix, so it is funny in a way.

I rebuilt the page yesterday. The paste box used to sit almost two screens down on a phone. It is on the first screen now, and there are one-tap prompts, because I finally worked out that nobody tapping a link in a text message is holding a pitch deck in their clipboard.

Let me get the obvious one out of the way, since this sub has a rule about it. Yes there is AI under this, and yes you could paste your work into a free chatbot and tell it to be harsh. My argument is that one voice agreeing with you is worth less than five that disagree with each other, and that the prompts are 15 years of knowing where work actually dies. That may be a distinction only I care about. Tell me if it is.

What I want roasted, in order:

1. The page. Does it make you want to try it, or close the tab?

2. The answer I just gave. Is "five voices that argue" worth anything, or is it a feature nobody asked for?

https://gettheboardroom.com

If the honest answer is that this should not exist, say that. I have a date at the end of the October where I decide whether to keep going.

Hey everyone,

I recently launched a voice-first web app called Ravecho, and I’m currently working on improving it. It’s still in active development, so I’d love to get some real feedback from people who try it out.

The idea behind Ravecho is a little different from standard text-based chat apps. Instead of typing back and forth, it’s built around real-time spoken voice interactions with historical figures, literary characters, historical events and primary sources. I’ve also built features like an Dinner Party (where you can put up to 5 historical figures at one table to converse with each other and you)

The goal is to make historical engagement and interaction feel like a natural conversation rather than just reading static text.

If you have a few minutes, check it out here: https://ravecho.com/

I’d really appreciate it if you could tell me what you think, what you like, what you don’t like (especially around voice latency or audio quality), and share any ideas that would improve the app. I haven't had a lot of feedback yet so would love to get some.

Thanks!