Change my mind: American towns have figured out waterfronts way more than Europeans.
I recently traveled from Marseille, France to Genova, Italy by car.
For all of the amazing design features and history of European towns and villages (and I think they are by and large superior to American ), basically none of them have serious waterfront infrastructure.
When I'm talking about waterfront structures I'm not just referring to fancy mixed used districts and walkways (Vancouver has great examples, but so does Barcelona).
What I mean is the way in which your average little town or village gives you
- actual access to the sea
- proper walkways, railings, toilets, etc.
- actual beaches, nature reserves, harbors
Especially in Italy I noticed that most of the towns and cities do not really interface with the Mediterranean Sea at all. In 90% of cases the town just sort of stops. Many of them will have railway infrastructure or decrepit industrial Estates right next to the shoreline. This is completely strange to me, since European towns usually are renowned for good urbanism.
I have also noticed this is true for mostly Mediterranean cities in Europe. Which makes even less sense to me, since you cannot really use the sea as much in the west of France or north of Spain, the Basque country etc. For some reason those regions have neat little harbors, walkways, beaches.
If you compare this to the United States, there are obviously crimes against urban design when it comes to waterfronts. Basically the entire Lake Michigan Shoreline is just one big industrial wasteland.
But if you look at any random coastal town that has some history, say along the tidewater region, Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia... even the smallest of towns will have some sort of amenity, public bathrooms, anything that makes the shoreline actually usable.
I'm really interested in everybody's opinion on this.