i want to know whats the name of the transition he used on this edit i mean like the warp one and is it easy to make on ae?

I'm using: after effects

I've TRIED: ae and capcut

I need help with: name of transition for ae edit

I', not really sure how to explain it, but you can see there's like an echo effect on the band and it looks trippy with colours etc. I know the background is green screen, which I plan on doing. Is there a way to achieve this look in after effects?

Hey first of all im a complete beginner in this field .I recently got an iPhone 17 and i took and edited some videos but the real problem is uploading them in whatsapp or instagram reduces the quality significantly but ive seen people upload videos that are compressed to “3mp”size but still has top notch quality. I would like to know how its done. The masters in this field do bless me with your knowledge

I share with you tutorial on how to create Apple style map animation :)

I have a situation where I am restoring analogue video that was transferred to Laserdisc poorly so there is field blending. I have tried every deinterlacing trick in the book with AVS and VS and I am having no luck. It's stubborn and cooked in there real bad.

I've been trying to find anything online but trying to Google this sort of thing gives me a old forum posts dating back 20 years where nobody solved the problem or websites trying to sell me AI upscalers that will absolutely not fix the problem.

Am I chasing a solution that does not currently exist or are search engines really that bad now?

If anyone can point me to a solution that'd be great. Even if it's some cost prohibitive solution like DRS Nova or something. I am going crazy not knowing if there is a definitive fix for this or not and how realistly in reach it might be.

Anyone who can shed insight on this would be great.

EDIT

I did a detailed analysis of the video to figure out exactly what's going on here. Here are the specifics:

The defect is field-domain temporal blending, not simple progressive-frame ghosting. The source is 29.97i/59.94-field NTSC with an underlying film/3:2 cadence, but individual fields contain weighted contributions from neighboring temporal states.

Analysis of separated fields shows that the blend coefficient is not fixed. Examples fit approximately:

70% current field + 30% adjacent temporal field
80% current + 20% adjacent
60% current + 40% adjacent

and there are occasional cases where the contaminating temporal state becomes dominant.

The two field parities can also have different blend strengths, so a woven frame may effectively contain something like:

Field A: 85% state X + 15% state Y
Field B: 65% state X + 35% state Y

rather than a uniform 50% Frame A + 50% Frame B blend.

The contamination appears to be primarily between temporally adjacent same-parity fields, which means the defect exists within the original field sequence before IVTC. Some fields remain essentially clean while others are strongly blended.

There is still a recognizable repeating NTSC film cadence underneath the damage, roughly consistent with a 10-field 3:2 cycle, but the temporal blending varies independently enough that normal TFM/TDecimate, sRestore, conventional deblend filters, etc. cannot reliably reconstruct the original fields.

Hard cuts are especially diagnostic: in some cases a single field immediately around the cut contains imagery from both completely different shots. The cross-shot contamination is brief — generally around one field, occasionally two — rather than behaving like a multi-frame dissolve.

So the defect is best described as something like:

clean 59.94-field sequence
       ↓
field-dependent temporal filtering / averaging
       ↓
some clean fields
some previous/current blends
some current/next blends
different coefficients by field/parity
occasional cross-shot contaminated fields

The main technical question is what historical video process would produce variable asymmetric temporal averaging at the individual-field level while retaining the underlying 3:2 cadence — e.g. frame synchronizer, standards/rate converter, temporal noise reduction, DVE, field-rate conversion, or some combination thereof.

Ahoy. I created a movie with my alpha6000 and 7ii. I edited everything in Davinci (free), and wondered, how every youtuber recommended another gamma setting, project setting, output profile, input profile etc. . I really dont understand these sonyLog2 to 709 options and every LUT for Sony was so horribly overtuned, I left it all away. Can someone break this profile and format stuff down for my 2 grandma cams? Thank you in advance.

first post on here :D

so question for digital editors who've never touched analog, what's stopping you?

I see a lot of people trying to emulate analog effects digitally with plugins and preset packs. For things like film i totally get it, given the cost and development time. But the VHS stuff i guess kinda confuses me. to my understanding can't you just buy a VHS player on eBay for $20, hook up a capture card, and actually just record your footage to tape?

You can also get CRT style effects by aiming your phone camera at a used TV from like facebook marketplace or something. granted that might cost more, but if its your whole aesthetic and you do it often, why not just use the real thing? wouldn't it look way more authentic?

genuinely curious!

Hey all,

Video editing newbie here. I did a shoot the other day with my IPhone 15 Pro Max, and DJI Osmo Pocket 3. All footage from both cameras was shot at 4k 60fps, standard dynamic range.

25 minutes IPhone footage 9 GB
30 minutes Pocket 3 footage 22.5 GB

I’m wondering why there is such a massive difference in file sizes here. If you factor in the 5 minutes extra in DJI footage it’s still like 2x the file size of the iPhone footage.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks all,

Hi there,

I got my footage from old mini dv tapes transferred and now have clips in DaVinci Resolve. When I try the Vocal Channel effect as well as Noise Reduction, they don't seem to do anything. I wonder if it is because the audio is not on a separate track after being transferred. Does anyone know how I could reduce background noise with these circumstances?

Thanks for any tips!

Meredith

lately, I’ve found myself in a situation that’s really bothering me: I need to choose between selling my gaming PC (which isn't great for editing) and buying a MacBook M1 Pro for my work. I work at an agency dealing with heavy 4K video files, and the editing process really lags on my PC. I know I need the Mac, but I’m going to miss being able to play games in my free time. Have any of you been through something similar? Could you help me see this as a positive move rather than a negative one?

​

I am trying to be well organized because of complexity of my story. So I edited each scene independently in different timeline now I have over 60 scenes. Now I want to move to my master timeline. My original plan was to put in and out in each timeline and drag them to master so premiere only uses that and if I want to go back to the scene and make changes it would be easy. But premiere doesn't do that and puts the entire sequence there. So I decided to copy clips themselves, but how can I make sure I don't lose track of the sequence it came from so if I want to add or make some changes it would be easier? Thank you all in advance